In this paper, the multi-criteria decision making in which criteria are assumed to be dependent with each other is investigated. Choquet integral is employed to aggregate the criteria evaluations of alternatives to reflect the interactions of the criteria. Objective and subjective information are integrated to derive the interactions of the criteria. The objective information of alternatives is expressed by decision matrix, whereas the subjective information is expressed by utilities or interval preference relations. Models are given to minimize the objective and subjective information. The proposed method can be considered as an extension of the existing methods, and can obtain smaller deviations and better overall evaluations of alternatives.
AnandalingamG. and OlssonC.E., A multi-stage multi-attribute decision model for project selection, European Journal of Operational Research43 (1989), 271–283.
2.
AngilellaS., CorrenteS., GrecoS. and SlowińskiR., MUSA-INT: Multicriteria customer satisfaction analysis with interacting criteria, Omega42 (2014), 189–200.
3.
ChoquetG., Theory of capacities, Annales de l’Institut Fourier54 (1953), 131–295.
4.
CorrenteS., GrecoS. and SlowińskiR., Multi-criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE, Omega41 (2013), 820–846.
5.
EumY.S., ParkK.S. and KimS.H., Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and value, Computers & Operations Research28 (2001), 397–409.
6.
FujimotoK., KojadinovicI. and MarichalJ.L., Axiomatic characterizations of probabilistic and cardinal-probabilistic interaction indices, Games and Economic Behavior55 (2006), 72–99.
7.
GrabischM., K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems92 (1997), 167–189.
8.
GrabischM., KojadinovicI. and MeyerP., A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory, European Journal of Operational Research186 (2008), 766–785.
9.
GrabischM. and LabreucheC., A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid, 4or: A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research6 (2008), 1–44.
10.
GrabischM., MarichalJ.L., MesiarR. and PapE., Aggregation functions (Vol. 127). Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
11.
HarsanyiJ.C., Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, Journal of Political Economy63 (1955), 309–321.
12.
HwangC.L. and YoonK., Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
13.
KeeneyR.L. and KirkwoodC.W., Group decision making using cardinal social welfare functions, Management Science22 (1975), 430–437.
14.
MaJ., FanZ.P. and HuangL.H., A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights, European Journal of Operational Research112 (1999), 397–404.
15.
MaJ., FanZ.P., JiangY.P. and MaoJ.Y., An optimization approach to multiperson decision making based on different formats of preference information, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics36 (2006), 876–889.
16.
ParkK.S., Mathematical programming models for characterizing dominance and potential optimality when multicriteria alternative values and weights are simultaneously incomplete, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics34 (2004), 601–614.
17.
SaatyT.L. and VargasL.G., Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research32 (1987), 107–117.
18.
SugenoM., Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications, Ph.D. Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, 1974.
19.
SchubertJ., On ρ in a decision-theoretic apparatus of Dempster-Shafer theory, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning13 (1995), 185–200.
20.
WangY.M. and ParkanC., Multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives: Ranking and weighting, Fuzzy Sets and Systems153 (2005), 331–346.
21.
WeberM., Decision making with incomplete information, European Journal of Operational Research28 (1987), 44–57.
22.
WuJ.Z., ZhangQ., DuQ. and DongZ., Compromise principle based methods of identifying capacities in the framework of multicriteria decision analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems246 (2014), 91–106.
23.
WuJ.Z. and ZhangQ., 2-order additive fuzzy measure identification method based on diamond pairwise comparison and maximum entropy principle, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making9 (2010), 435–453.
24.
XuZ.S., On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making3 (2003), 217–225.
25.
XuZ.S., Multiple-attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics37 (2007), 1500–1511.
26.
XuZ.S. and ChenJ., MAGDM linear-programming models with distinct uncertain preference Structures, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, an, Cybernetics38 (2008a), 1356–1370.
27.
XuZ.S. and ChenJ., Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research184 (2008b), 266–280.
