Group decision making (GDM) problems consist of finding the most acceptable solution based on a group of experts’ preferences. Sometimes, the experts experience difficulty expressing their preferences using crisp values or making comparisons between each pair of alternatives. Meanwhile, because of their different backgrounds or knowledge concerning a specific problem, the opinions of different experts may carry different weights along the decision process. Thus, a new consensus model is proposed to solve these problems. First, experts are required to express their opinions using fuzzy linguistic preference relations, and then, a new method is proposed for classifying the experts into three different importance levels according to these opinions. Then, consistency measures and proximity measures are used to guide the decision-making process. A new feedback mechanism that generates advice for experts according to their different levels is proposed. The importance degrees of experts are taken into consideration throughout the process, which is one of the main novelties of this model. Finally, a numerical example is conducted to illustrate the utilization and compared results are also presented to check the feasibility of the proposed model.
CabrerizoF.J., Herrera-ViedmaE. and PedryczW., A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts, European Journal of Operational Research230(3) (2013), 624–633.
2.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments, Fuzzy Sets and Systems78(1) (1996), 73–87.
3.
ZhangX., A method for group decision making with multigranularity linguistic information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 2955–2962.
4.
GarciJ.T., Del MoralM., MartínezM. and Herrera-ViedmaE., A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations, Expert Systems with Applications39(11) (2012), 10022–10030.
5.
WangJ.Q., PengJ.J., ZhangH.Y., LiuT. and ChenX.H., An uncertain linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making method based on a cloud model, Group Decision and Negotiation24(1) (2015), 171–192.
6.
Herrera-ViedmaE., ChiclanaF., HerreraF. and AlonsoS., Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics37(1) (2007), 176–189.
7.
WangZ.J. and LiK.W., A multi-step goal programming approach for group decision making with incomplete interval additive reciprocal comparison matrices, European Journal of Operational Research242(3) (2015), 890–900.
8.
AlonsoS., Herrera-ViedmaE., ChiclanaF. and HerreraF., A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences, Information Sciences180 (2010), 4477–4495.
9.
KacprzykJ. and FedrizziM., Soft consensus measures for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences, Control and Cybernetics15(3-4) (1986), 309–323.
10.
CabrerizoF.J., MorenoJ.M., PérezI.J. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: Advantages and drawbacks, Soft Computing14(5) (2010), 451–463.
11.
CabrerizoF.J., PérezI.J., Herrera-ViedmaE., Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information, Knowledge-Based Systems23(2) (2010), 169–181.
12.
Ben-AriehD., EastonT. and EvansB., Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans39(1) (2009), 210–217.
13.
YagerR.R., Weighted maximum entropy OWA aggregation with applications to decision making under risk, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans39(3) (2009), 555–564.
14.
HuangY.S., ChangW.C., LiW.H. and LinZ.L., Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making, European Journal of Operational Research229(2) (2013), 462–469.
15.
PérezI.J., CabrerizoF.J., AlonsoS. and Herrera-ViedmaE., A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems44(4) (2014), 494–498.
16.
ChiclanaF., Herrera-ViedmaE., AlonsoS. and HerreraF., Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: A characterization of multiplicative transitivity, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems17(1) (2009), 14–23.
17.
LiX.H. and ChenX.H., Multi-criteria group decision making based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information, Applied Soft Computing30 (2015), 454–461.
18.
CabrerizoF.J., UreñaR., PedryczW. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity, Fuzzy sets and Systems255 (2014), 115–127.
19.
Herrera-ViedmaE., CabrerizoF.J., KacprzykJ. and PedryczW., A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment, Information Fusion17 (2014), 4–13.
20.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8(3) (1965), 338–353.
21.
WangT.C. and ChenY.H., Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP, Information Sciences178(19) (2008), 3755–3765.
22.
HsuT.H. and LinL.Z., Using fuzzy preference method for group package tour based on the risk perception, and Negotiation, Group Decision23(2) (2014), 299–323.
23.
LiaoH.C. and XuZ.S., Automatic procedures for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(5) (2014), 2341–2353.
24.
AlonsoS., ChiclanaF., HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE., Alcalá-FdezJ. and PorcelC., A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values, International Journal of Intelligent Systems23(2) (2008), 155–175.
25.
XuY.J., LiK.W. and WangH.M., Incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications, Computers & Industrial Engineering67 (2014), 93–103.
26.
Herrera-ViedmaE., AlonsoS., ChiclanaF. and HerreraF., A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems15(5) (2007), 863–877.
27.
MataF., MartínezL. and Herrera-ViedmaE., An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems17(2) (2009), 279–290.
28.
ChenZ.P. and YangW., A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Applied Mathematical Modelling35(9) (2011), 4424–4437.
29.
QiX.W., LiangC.Y. and ZhangJ.L., Generalized cross-entropy based group decision making with unknown expert and attribute weights under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Computers & Industrial Engineering79 (2015), 52–64.
30.
LiX.H. and ChenX.H., Extension of the TOPSIS method based on prospect theory and trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for group decision making, and Systems Engineering, Journal of Systems Science23(2) (2014), 231–247.
31.
XuZ.S. and CaiX.Q., Deriving weights from interval multiplicative preference relations in group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation23(4) (2014), 695–713.
32.
LiuF., ZhangW.G. and WangZ.X., A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making, European Journal of Operational Research218(3) (2012), 747–754.
33.
DongY.C., ZhangG.Q., HongW.C. and XuY.F., Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method, Decision Support Systems49(3) (2010), 281–289.
34.
BernasconiM., ChoiratC. and SeriR., Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence, European Journal of Operational Research232(3) (2014), 584–592.
35.
AhnB.S., A priori identification of preferred alternatives of OWA operators by relational analysis of arguments, Information Sciences180(23) (2010), 4572–4581.
36.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research120(1) (2000), 144–161.
37.
FanZ.P. and ZhangY., A goal programming approach to group decision-making with three formats of incomplete preference relations, Soft Computing14(10) (2010), 1083–1090.
38.
CabrerizoF.J., HeradioR., PérezI.J. and Herrera-ViedmaE., A selection process based on additive consistency to deal with incomplete fuzzy linguistic information, Journal of Universal Computer Science16(1) (2010), 62–81.
39.
RezaeiJ. and OrttR., Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP, European Journal of Operational Research225(1) (2013), 75–84.
