Abstract
Introduction: There is minimal information in the literature concerning the intramachine reliability of the new Isokinetic dynamometer Con-Trex MJ, and the intermachine reproducibility of this instrument with the Cybex Norm isokinetic dynamometer.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide some insight with regard to the reproducibility of Con-Trex MJ in measuring the knee muscle performance in flexion and extension (concentric) and to compare the variability of measurement between Con-Trex and Cybex Norm.
Methods: 35 (70 legs) male subjects with no previous history of any knee pathology volunteered for the study. Intramachine reproducibility was evaluated by assessing 30 legs twice on the Con-Trex MJ, within 2 to 7 days, at angular velocities of 60°, 180° and 300°/sec. Intermachine reproducibility was evaluated by assessing 40 legs randomly on the Con-Trex MJ and Cybex Norm within 2 to 7 days at 60° and 180°/sec. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to determine the reproducibility of repeated measurements at $p< 0.01$. Results: Intra: The variability of measurements of Con-Trex for Peak Torque, was 5.19–5.68% for extension and 4.84–7.33% for flexion depending on the angular velocity. This is acceptable for clinical and research studies. Inter: Between the two Isokinetic devices there was a greater CV for Peak Torque ranging 7.28–9.17% for extension and 8.54–15.84% for flexion.
Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, comparisons of results between the two devices may not be valid. The results for knee flexion and extension measurements at 60° and 180°/sec recorded with Con-Trex were consistently greater than the values recorded with the Cybex Norm.