This study aims to determine the effect of augmented reality-based mobile software on students’ academic achievement in the technical drawing lesson. Quantitative method was used in the study. In order to determine the effect of augmented reality-based mobile software developed on the students’ academic achievement, a static group pre-test-posttest experimental design was used. The study group consists of 84 engineering students. Thirty-seven of the students participating in the study are female and 47 are male. Academic achievement test was used in the study. -test was used in data analysis. In the results of study it was concluded that the use of augmented reality technology in technical drawing lessons increased students’ academic achievement.
AbdüsselamM.S., and SevencanO. (2014). Fizik öğretiminde artırılmış gerçeklik ortamlarının kullanımlarına ilişkin öğretmen ve ör̆enci görüşleri: 11.sınıf manyetizma konusu örneği. Pegem Eğrtim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 4(1), 59-74.
2.
Akkuşİ. (2016). Bilgisayar destekli teknik resim dersinde artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının makine mühendisliği öğrencilerinin akademik başarısına ve uzamsal yeteneklerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
3.
ArslanM. (2017). Modüler Öğretim Sistemli Uygulama Yapraklı Teknik Resim. İstanbul: Arslan Yayıncılık.
4.
AzumaR.T. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
BaiZ.BlackwellF., and CoulourisG. (2013). Through the looking glass: Pretend play for children with autism. In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 49-58.
6.
BalakM.V., and KısaM. (2016). Artırılmış gerçeklik teknolojisinin teknik resim eğitimi üzerindeki etkilerinin araştırılması. Harran Üniversitesi Mühendislik Dergisi, (2), 17-26.
7.
BüyüköztürkŞ. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
8.
CaiH. (2013). Using augmented reality as motivators for youth enviromental education: An American Harts’s tongue fern conservation project. State University of New York.
9.
CaiS.WangX., and ChianF.K. (2014). A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, (37), 31-40.
10.
ConteroM., and LópezD.P. (2013). Delivering educational multimedia contents through an augmented reality application: A case study on its ımpact on knowledge acquisition and retention. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 19-28.
11.
ChengK.H., and TsaiC.C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449-462.
12.
DağlıG., and ÖznacarB. (2012). Problems faced by information technology teachers in schools at high school level and solutions to such problems. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 2(4), 13-20.
13.
DelelloJ.A. (2014). Insights from pre-service teachers using science-based augmented reality. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(4), 295-311.
14.
DoğanA. (2016). Meslek Lisesi teknik resim dersinde fotoğraf destekli öğretimin etkililiği. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
15.
FigueiredoM.SousaL.CardosoP.RodriguesJ.GonçalvesC., and AlvesR. (2014). Learning technical drawing with augmented reality and holograms. Recent Advances in Educational Technologies and Methodologies, 11-20.
16.
GutierrezJ.M.SaorínJ.L.ConteroM., and RayaM.L. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91.
17.
HsiaoK., and RashvandH. (2011). Integrating body language movements in augmented reality learning environment. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 1(1), 1-10.
18.
KaenchanP. (2018). Examining thai students’ experiences of augmented reality technology in a university language education classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, United States.
19.
KaleciD.Demircioglu DemirelT., and Akkuşİ. (2016). Örnek bir artırılmış gerçeklik uygulaması tasarımı. XVIII. Akademik Bilişim Kongresi, Aydın.
20.
KatsioloudisP.J., and JonesM.V. (2018). A comparative analysis of holographic, 3d-printed, and computer-generated models: Implications for engineering technology students’ spatial visualization ability. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 36-53.
21.
KaufmannH. (2003). Collaborative augmented reality in education. Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems, Vienna University of Technology.
22.
KerawallaL.LuckinR.SelijefotS., and WoolardA. (2006). Making it real: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(4), 163-174.
23.
MEGEP. (2007). Geometrik Çizimler. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
24.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018). Türkiye’de Mesleki ve Teknik Eğitimin Görünümü. Eğitim Analiz ve Değerlendirme Raporları Serisi No: 1, Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
25.
ÖznacarB., and DericioğluD. (2017). The role of school administrators in the use of technology. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 2, 13(1), 253-268.
26.
Perez-LopezD., and ConteroM. (2013). Delivering educational multimedia contents through an augmented reality application: A case study on its impact on knowledge acquisition and retention. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET.
27.
RambliD.R.A.MatchaW., and SulaimanS. (2013). Fun learning with AR alphabet book for preschool children. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 211-219.
28.
SırakayaM. (2016). Artırılmış gerçekliğin uygulamalı eğitimde kullanımı: Anakart montajı. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 17(3).
29.
SinghalS.BaggaS.GoyalP., and SaxenaV. (2012). Augmented chemistry: Interactive education system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 49(15), 1-5.
30.
TengC.-H.ChenJ.-Y., and ChenZ.-H. (2018). Impact of augmented reality on programming language learning: Efficiency and perception. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(2), 254-271.
31.
TomiA.B., and RambliD.R.A. (2013). An interactive mobile augmented reality magical playbook: Learning number with the thirsty crow. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 123-130.
32.
WangH.-C.ChangC.-Y., and LiT.-Y. (2007). The comparative efficacy of 2D-versus 3D-based media design for influencing spatial visualization skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1943-1957.
33.
WangX. (2012). Augmented reality: A new way of augmented learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652.
34.
WojciechowskiR., and CellaryW. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570-585.
35.
WuH.K.LeeS.W.ChangH.Y., and LiangJ.C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, (62), 41-49.
36.
YenJ.-C.TsaiC.-H., and WuM. (2013). Augmented reality in the higher education: Students’ science concept learning and academic achievement in astronomy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 165-173.
37.
YıldırımA., and ÇarıkçıO. (2017). Mesleki eğitimin gelecek vizyonu; İnsan kaynakları planlaması açısından bir bürokratik model denemesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29(4), 397-413.
38.
YılmazR.M., and GöktaşY. (2018). Using augmented reality technology in education. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(2), 510-537.
39.
YuenS.C.Y.YaoyuneyongG., and JohnsonE. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development Exchange, 4(1), 119-140.
