Territorial decision problems have a spatial complex nature which is also multidimensional, interdisciplinary, poorly defined and requiring the definition of several criteria with dissimilar importance. These types of problem involve many decision makers (individuals and institutions), with conflicting interests, preferences and points of view. In the current study, our contribution focuses on the design and development of a multicriteria spatial group decision support system to conduct the spatial localization process in Territory Planning: the problem that involves finding a surface that best meets certain criteria from a set of variants (the location of infrastructure: shopping center, hospital, school, …). The suggested system SIGMAS allows taking into account both the spatial dimension as well as specific and divergent interests of different decision makers to reach an acceptable agreement. In this context, the proposed SGDSS is based on the coupling of two representations of reality: Multi Agent Systems (MAS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). We endow the MAS with a negotiation protocol based on mediation, featuring a coordinator agent responsible for the smooth conduct of negotiation and a set of participant agents representing different decision makers impacted by the decision in TP. This protocol exploits, also, multicriteria analysis methods namely ELECTRE III and ELECTRE TRI.
DiasJ.A., FigueiraJ.R. and RoyB., A multiple criteria sorting method where each category is characterized by several reference actions: The electreTri-nC method, European Journal of Operational Research217(3) (2012), 567-579.
2.
AmgoudL., DimopoulousY. and MoraitisP., A general framework for argumentation-based negotiation, 4 International Conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, (2008).
3.
MenaS.B., Une solution informatisée à l'analyse de sensibilité d'Electre III, Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ5(1) (2001), 31-35.
4.
BensaidA., BarkiM., TalbiO., BenhanifiaK. and MendasA., L'analyse multicritère comme outil d'aide à la décision pour la localisation spatiale des zones à forte pression anthropique: le cas du département de Naama en Algérie, Journal Télédétection, 7(1) (2007), 359-371.
5.
BoulemiaC., Henry etG.PecqueurO., Eléments de proposition à la mise en place d'une base de données urbaines dans une collectivité locale in: Actes of the Congress AUGC, Lyon, (2000). %
6.
7.
CailletR., Analyse multicritère: Etude et comparaison des méthodes existantes en vue d'une application en analyse de cycle de vie, Scientific series, CIRANO, University of Montreal, (2003).
8.
Chaib-draaB., Interaction between agents in routine, familiar and unfamiliar situations, International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems5(1) (1996), 1-25.
9.
DavisR. and SmithR., Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving, Journal of Artificial Intelligence20(1) (1983), 63-109.
10.
EhrgottM., FigueiraJ.R. and GrecoS., Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis, International Series in Operations Research and Management, Springer Edition, (2010).
11.
FerberJ., Les systèmes multi-agents, vers une intelligence collective, Inter Editions, 1995.
12.
FerberJ. and GutknechtO., A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems, Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS98) (1998).
13.
FigueiraJ.R., MousseauV. and RoyB., Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, International Series in Operations Research and Management, Springer Edition, (2005).
14.
FranchesquinN., Modélisation et simulation multi-agents d'écosystèmes anthropisés: Une application à la gestion hydraulique en grande camargue, PHD Thesis, University of Aix-Marseille III, (2001).
15.
HamdadouD., Un Modèle d'Aide à la Décision en aménagement du territoire, une approche multicritère et une approche de négociation, PHD Thesis, University of Oran, (2008).
16.
HamdadouD., Labed etK.BeldjilaliB., Proposal for a decision-making process in regional planning: GIS, multicriterion approach, choquet's integral and genetic algorithms, in: Actes of ERIMA'07, European Research on Innovation Management Alliance, Biarritz, France, (2007), 51-59.
17.
HamadoucheM.A., KhaladiM., KhaldiA., FekkirY., AnteurD. and DrissM., SIG, télédétection et analyse multicritères: Vers un outil de gestion et de préservation de la biodiversité du parc national de l'Ahaggar (Algérie), in: Actes of the Sixth Session of the International Conference Geotunis (2011).
18.
Hemaissia-JeanninM., Négociation combinée et multicritères d'agents coopératifs, PHD Thesis, University of Paris, (2008).
19.
Project RNTS (National Network for Health Technologies: HEROS) Period: 2004. Project under the responsibility of Caroline Morel-Wascat. http://evalabuniv-lille2.fr/fr/realisations/outilsde-travail-collectif/prise-de-decision-collective.html.
20.
JenningsN.R., FaratinP., LomuscioA., ParsonsS., SierraC. and WooldridgeM., Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges, International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation10(2) (2001), 199-215.
21.
JoerinF., Décider sur le territoire: proposition d'une approche par utilisation de SIG et de méthodes d'analyse multicritère, PHD Thesis, University of Lausanne, (1997).
22.
KhalilW., GoonetillesseA., KokotA. and CarrollS., Use of chemometrics methods and multicriteria decision-making for site selection for sustainable on-site sewage effluent disposal, Journal of Analytica Chimica Acta, Elsevier506(1) (2004), 41-56.
23.
KrausS. and WilkenfeldJ., Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments, artificial intelligence, in: Actes of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1991).
24.
ManginE., Concertation et vote électronique, étude bibliographique, 2002.
25.
MaystreL.Y., PictetJ. and SimosJ., Méthodes multicritères electre, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, Suisse, 1994.
26.
MorgeM. and BeauneP., Conception multi-agents d'un système d'aide à la décision collective, in: Actes of JFSMA'03 (2003), 359-363.
27.
MottierV., Un composant logiciel pour les systèmes informatisés de gestion des réseaux d'assainissements, PHD Thesis, Federal Polytechnic School of Lausanne, Suisse, (1999).
28.
Ok1K., OkanT. and YilmazE., A comparative study on activity selection with multicriteria decision-making techniques in ecotourism planning, Scientific Research and Essays Journal6(6) (2011), 1417-1427.
29.
RoyB., BouyssouD., Jacquet-LagrezeE., PernyP., SlowinskiR. and VanderpootenD., Ph. Vincke, aiding decisions with multiple criteria, Essays in Honor of Bernard Roy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, (2002).
30.
RoyB., Aide multicritère à la décision: Méthodes et cas, Economica, Paris, 1993.
31.
RuffezP., Etude de la négociation dans le cadre d'un Jeu de rôle sur le Sylvopastoralisme, Formation report, IARFA, 2003.
32.
SaatyL., DahanL. and HirschG., Décider face à la complexité: Une approche analytique multicritère d'aide à la décision, Business and Economics (1984).
33.
BuchananJ., SheppardP. and VanderpootenD., Project ranking using ELECTRE III, research report 99-01, University of Waikato, Department of Management Systems, New-Zealand, 1999.
34.
SmoliarS. and SpragueR., Communication and understanding for decision support, in: Actes of the international Conference IFIP TC8/WG8.3, Irlande, (2002), 107-119.
35.
TaylorA.D., Mathematics and politics: Strategy, voting, power, and proof, Springer-Verlag, 1995.
36.
EndrissU., Monotonic concession protocols for multilateral negotiation, Notes of cours, University of Amsterdam, 2006.
37.
VerronsM.H., Une forme de négociation entre entités virtuelles, in: Actes of the international Conference MajecSTIC'04 (2004).
38.
WooldridgeM., An introduction to multiagent systems, Course notes, University of Liverpool, UK, 2002.
