Bellman, R.E. (1965). On the application of dynamic programming to the determination of optimal play in chess and checkers. PNAS, 53(2), 244–247. doi:10.1073/pnas.53.2.244.
2.
Chéron, A. (1969). Lehr und Handbuch Der Endspiele. Vol. 1, 315-329(esp. p. 323) and Vol. 3, pp. 285-297. Siegfried Engelhardt Verlag. ASIN B0021WO8L2.
3.
de Man, R., Guo, B. & Fiekas, N. (2018). Query interface to the sub-8-man DTZ50″ EGTs.
4.
Donner, J.H. (2006). The King, esp. pp. 319-327. The English translation of De Koning (1987). New in Chess.
5.
Dvoretsky (2003). Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual, Russell Enterprises. 4th edition (2014).
6.
Haworth, G.McC. (2020). http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/86555/. This article with supporting pgn file covering the 25 cited positions.
7.
Komissarchik, E.A. & Futer, A.L. (1974). Об анализе ферзевого энщшпиля при помощи ЭВМ. (Ob Analize Ferzevogo Endshpilya pri Pomoshchi EVM. Analysis of a queen endgame using an IBM computer.). Проблемю кибернетики (Problemy Kybernetiki), 29, pp. 211-220. Republished in English by Posthoff and Herschberg as ‘Computer Analysis of a Queen Endgame’, ICCA Journal, 9(4), 189–198 (1986).
8.
Mūller, K. & Haworth, G. (2013). Rook versus Bishop. ICGA Journal, 36(4), 195–202. doi:10.3233/ICG-2013-36402.
9.
Mūller, K. & Konoval, Y. (2016). ‘URE’: Understanding Rook Endgames. Gambit.
10.
Mūller, K. & Konoval, Y. (2018). ‘UME’: Understanding Minor Piece Endgames. Russell.
11.
Mūller, K. & Konoval, Y. (2019). Understanding Rook vs Minor Piece Endgames. Russell.
12.
Nunn, J. (1994). Secrets of Pawnless Endings. Batsford.
13.
Nunn, J. (2002). Secrets of Pawnless Endings. (Second, expanded edition). Gambit.
Ströhlein, T. (1970). Untersuchungen über kombinatorische Spiele. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Munich.
16.
Thompson, K. (1986). Retrograde analysis of certain endgames. ICCA Journal, 9(3), 131–139.
17.
Timman, J. (2011). The Art of the Endgame. esp. Ch. 2, Rook versus Bishop. New in Chess.5. (Note: Figure 6’s exercises, solutions and comments: E1.02: Not 86. Ne3+? as played but 86. Nh2+!! Kg3 87. Nf1+!! =. E2.01: 1. Kf5! (not 1. Rf7? Kg8!! 2. Ke6 Bg5=) Kg8 2. Ra4! Be1 3. Kg6! Kf8 4. Rf4+! Ke7 5. Re4+! 1-0.E3.01: 80...Nh2? lost (81. Kf4 Kf7 82. Re2 Nf1 83. Rf2 ...) but 80...Kf7! 81. Ra8 Ne5 82. Ra7+ Nfd7 draws.E4.01: 82. Kf6!? and Black, in deadly zugzwang, resigned. 82...Rd8 83. a7 Kc7 84. a8Q; 82...Kc7 83. a7.E6.01: 53. Nd6+! Kb8 54. c7+, and Black resigned in view of 54...Rxc7 55. Rd8+! Rc8 56. Rxc8#.)
18.
van den Herik, J., Herschberg, R. & Nakad, N. (1987). A Six-Men-Endgame Database: KRP(a2)KbBP(a3). ICCA Journal, 10(4), 163–180. See also ICCA Journal, 11(2–3) 82–91.
19.
van der Heijden, H.M.J.F. (2015). http://www.hhdbv.nl/. HHdbV, Endgame Study Database V.
