Stalemating the opponent in chess has given rise to various opinions as to the nature of that result and the reward it should properly receive. Here, following Lasker and Reti, we propose that ‘stalemate’ is a secondary goal, superior to a draw by agreement or rule – but inferior to mate. We report the work of ‘Aloril’ who has created endgame tables holding both ‘DTM’ depth to mate and ‘DTS’ depth to stalemate data, and who should be regarded as the prime author of this paper. Further, we look at the classification of ‘Chess Stalemate Studies’ in the context of a ‘Lasker Chess’ which recognises the stalemate goal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronian, L. & Grigoryan, M. (2017). https://tinyurl.com/icgaj064, especially 15′06″ in. Levon Aronian interviewed by Meri Grigoryan. Chessbase.
2.
Beasley, J. (2019). Private correspondence.
3.
Beasley, J. & Whitworth, T. (1996). Endgame Magic, Batsford. 2nd ed., Dover (2017).
4.
Bleicher, E. (2019). http://www.k4it.de/index.php?topic=egtb&lang=en. Nalimov sub-7-man EGTs.
5.
Bungart, M. (2013). Endspielanalyse für Lasker–Schach. M.Sc. thesis. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena.
6.
Chessbase (2018). Chessbase 2019: a database of over 7.6 million games.
7.
de Lucena, L.R. (~1497). Repetición de Amores y Arte de Ajedrez con 101 Juegos de Partido.
8.
de Man, R., Fiekas, N. & Guo, B. (2018). https://tinyurl.com/icga007. Fiekas’ interface to ‘Syzygy formatted’ de Man sub-7-man and Guo 7-man DTZ50″ EGTs.
Müller, K. & Haworth, G.McC. (2019). http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/86343/. Stalemate and ‘DTS’ Depth to Stalemate Endgame Tables. This note plus core and supplementary data, pgn files and statistics.
