Industry 4.0 leads to a strong digitalization of industrial processes, but also a significant increase in communication and cooperation between the machines that make it up. This is the case with autonomous industrial vehicles (AIVs) and other cooperative mobile robots which are multiplying in factories, often in the form of fleets of vehicles, and whose intelligence and autonomy are increasing. While the autonomy of autonomous vehicles has been well characterized in the field of road and road transport, this is not the case for the autonomous vehicles used in industry. The establishment and deployment of AIV fleets raises several challenges, all of which depend on the actual level of autonomy of the AIVs: acceptance by employees, vehicle location, traffic fluidity, collision detection, or vehicle perception of changing environments. Thus, simulation serves to account for the constraints and requirements formulated by the manufacturers and future users of AIVs. In this paper, after having proposed a broad state of the art on the problems to be solved in order to simulate AIVs before proceeding to experiments in real conditions, we present a method to estimate positions of AIVs moving in a closed industrial environment, the extension of a collision detection algorithm to deal with the obstacle avoidance issue, and the development of an agent-based simulation platform for simulating these two methods and algorithms. The resulting/final/subsequent simulation will allow us to experiment in real conditions.
LasiHFettkePKemperHGFeldTHoffmannM. Industry 4.0. Business & information systems engineering. 2014; 6(4): 239–242.
2.
PereiraACRomeroF. A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing. 2017; 13: 1206–1214.
3.
WisemanY. Autonomous vehicles. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fifth Edition, IGI Global, 2021, pp. 1–11.
4.
AndreassonHBouguerraACirilloMDimitrovDNDriankovD, et al. Autonomous Transport Vehicles: Where We Are and What Is Missing. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2015; 22(1): 64–75.
5.
TsolakisNBechtsisDSraiJS. Intelligent autonomous vehicles in digital supply chains: From conceptualisation, to simulation modelling, to real-world operations. Business Process Management Journal. 2019; 25(3): 414–437.
6.
KhayyamHJavadiBJaliliMJazarRN. Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things for Autonomous Vehicles. In: Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 39–68.
7.
PeresRSJiaXLeeJSunKColomboAW, et al. Industrial artificial intelligence in industry 4.0-systematic review, challenges and outlook. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 220121–220139.
8.
Medrano-BerumenCİlhan AkbaşM. Validation of decision-making in artificial intelligence-based autonomous vehicles. Journal of Information and Telecommunication. 2021; 5(1): 83–103.
9.
BostelmanRMessinaE. Towards development of an automated guided vehicle intelligence level performance standard. In Autonomous Industrial Vehicles: From the Laboratory to the Factory Floor, ed. BostelmanR. and MessinaE. (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International 2016), 2016, pp. 1–22.
10.
De RyckMVersteyheMDebrouwereF. Automated guided vehicle systems, state-of-the-art control algorithms and techniques. J. of Manufacturing Systems. 2020; 54: 152–173.
11.
NdaoADjoko-KouamMFougèresA-J. Matrix Beaconing for the Location of Autonomous Industrial Vehicles on a Simulation Platform. Int. Conf. on Advances in Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence, ASPAI’2021, Porto, Portugal, 2021, pp. 80–86.
12.
GrossetJFougèresA-JDjoko-KouamMCouturierCBonninJ-M. Simulation of a collision and obstacle avoidance algorithm for cooperative industrial autonomous vehicles. 2nd IFSA Conf. on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0, ARCI’2022, Andorra la Vella, Andorra, 2022, pp. 88–91.
13.
BahnesNKecharBHaffafH. Cooperation Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles to enhance container terminal operations. J. of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems. 2016; 3(1): 22–29.
14.
ChenYArdila-GomezAFrameG. Achieving energy savings by intelligent transportation systems investments in the context of smart cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2017; 54: 381–396.
15.
EsmaeilianBBehdadSWangB. The evolution and future of manufacturing: a review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2016; 39: 79–100.
16.
MonostoriLValckenaersPDolguiAPanettoHBrdysMCsájiBC. Cooperative control in production and logistics. IFAC Proceeding Volumes. 2014; 19: 4246–65.
17.
BlesingCLuenschDKorthB. Concept of a multi-agent based decentralized production system for the automotive industry. Lecture notes in computer science, 2018, pp. 19–30.
18.
FantiMPManginiAMPedroncelliGUkovichW. A decentralized control strategy for the coordination of AGV systems. Control Eng Pract. 2018; 70: 86–97.
19.
DraganjacIMiklicDKovacicZVasiljevicGBogdanS. Decentralized control of multi-AGV systems in autonomous warehousing applications. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2016; 13(4): 1433–1447.
20.
XieJLiuCC. Multi-agent systems and their applications. Journal Int Council Electr Eng. 2017; 7(1): 188–197.
21.
MeissnerHIlsenRAurichJC. Analysis of control architectures in the context of Industry 4.0. Proc CIRP. 2017; 62: pp. 165–9.
22.
De RyckMVersteyheMShariatmadarK. Resource management in decentralized industrial automated guided vehicle systems. J Manuf Syst. 2020; 54: 204–214.
23.
JiaXMengMQ. A survey and analysis of task allocation algorithms in multi-robot systems. IEEE Int. Conf. on obotics and biomimetics, ROBIO 2013, 2013, pp. 2280–2305.
24.
MosteoARMontanoL. A survey of multi-robot task allocation. Instituto de Investigacin en Ingenierła de Aragn, Tech. Rep, 2010, pp. 1–27.
25.
GerkeyBPMataricMJ. A formal analysis and taxonomy of task allocation in multi-robot systems. Int J Robot Res. 2004; 23(7): 939–954.
26.
KhamisAHusseinAElmogyA. Multi-robot task allocation: a review of the state-of-the-art. Coop Robots Sensor Netw. 2015; 2: 31–51.
27.
CawoodGJGorlachIA. Navigation and locomotion of a low-cost Automated Guided Cart. Proc. of the pattern recognition association of South Africa and robotics and mechatronics international conference, PRASA-RobMech 2015, 2015, pp. 83–8.
28.
BarberaHMQuinoneroJPCIzquierdoMAZSkarmetaAG. i-Fork: a flexible AGV system using topological and grid maps. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, 2003, pp. 2147–52.
29.
LuSXuCZhongRYWangL. A RFID-enabled positioning system in automated guided vehicle for smart factories. J Manuf Syst. 2017; 44: 179–190.
30.
FeledyCLuttenbergerS. A state of the art map of the AGVS technology and a guideline for how and where to use it. Tech. rep. Lund: U. of Lund; 2017.
31.
YoonSWParkSBKimJS. Kalman filter sensor fusion for Mecanum wheeled automated guided vehicle localization. J Sensors. 2015; pp. 1–8.
32.
KunchevVJainLIvancevicVFinnA. Path planning and obstacle avoidance for autonomous mobile robots: a review. 10th Int. Conf. on Knowledge-based & Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, 2006, pp. 537–44.
33.
KimDHHaiNTJoeWY. A guide to selecting path planning algorithm for automated guided vehicle (AGV). Lect Notes Electr Eng. 2018; 465: 587–96.
34.
KarurKSharmaNDharmattiCSiegelJE. A Survey of Path Planning Algorithms for Mobile Robots. Vehicles. 2021; 3: 448–468.
35.
CardarelliEDiganiVSabattiniLSecchiCFantuzziC. Cooperative cloud robotics architecture for the coordination of multi-AGV systems in industrial warehouses. Mechatronics. 2017; 45: 1–13.
36.
NascimentoAMVismariLFMolinaCBSTCugnascaPSCamargoJB, et al. A systematic literature review about the impact of artificial intelligence on autonomous vehicle safety. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2019; 21(12): 4928–4946.
37.
SrivastavaSCChoudharyAK. Development of an intelligent agent-based AGV controller for a flexible manufacturing system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2008; 36: 780–797.
38.
JoseKPratiharDK. Task allocation and collision-free path planning of centralized multi-robots system for industrial plant inspection using heuristic methods. Robot Autonom Syst. 2016; 80: 34–42.
39.
DiganiVCaramaschiFSabattiniLSecchiCFantuzziC. Obstacle avoidance for industrial AGVs. Proc. IEEE 10th int. conf. on intelligent computer communication and processing (ICCP 2014), 2014, pp. 227–32.
40.
WinklerASuchýJ. Dynamic collision avoidance of industrial cooperating robots using virtual force fields. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2012; 45: 265–70.
41.
JägerMNebelB. Decentralized collision avoidance, deadlock detection, and deadlock resolution for multiple mobile robots. Proceedings IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium. 2001; 3: 1213–1219.
42.
MarinoDFagioliniAPallottinoL. Distributed collision-free protocol for AGVs in industrial environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1101.2270, 2011.
43.
DemesureGDefoortMBekrarATrentesauxDDjemaiM. Decentralized motion planning and scheduling of AGVs in an FMS. IEEE Trans Industrial Informatics. 2018; 14(4): 1744–1752.
44.
IFAVis.,Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems, Eur J Oper Res. 2006; 170(3): 677–709.
45.
KabirQSSuzukiY. Comparative analysis of different routing heuristics for the battery management of automated guided vehicles. Int J Prod Res. 2018; 57(2): 624–641.
46.
DanielASubburathinamKMuthuBRajkumarNPandianS. Procuring Cooperative Intelligence in Autonomous Vehicles for Object Detection through Data Fusion Approach. IET Intel. Transport Syst. 2020; 14(11): 1410–1417.
47.
QuXvan AremB. Introduction, Special Issue: Computational modelling of connected and automated transport systems. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2021; 36(7): 819–819.
48.
ZhengXHuangHWangJZhaoXXuQ. Behavioral decision-making model of the intelligent vehicle based on driving risk assessment. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2021; 36(7): 820–837.
49.
WangZZhaoXXuZLiXQuX. Modeling and field experiments on autonomous vehicle lane changing with surrounding human-driven vehicles. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2021; 36(7): 877–889.
50.
LiQLiXHuangZHalkiasJMcHaleGJamesR. Simulation of mixed traffic with cooperative lane changes. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2021.
51.
WangYHouSWangX. Reinforcement learning-based bird-view automated vehicle control to avoid crossing traffic. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2021; 36(7): 890–901.
52.
ZhangXRobsonEWallerST. An integrated transport and economic equilibrium model for autonomous transportation systems considering parking behavior. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2021; 36(7): 902–921.
53.
CaoDWuJWuJKulcsárBQuX. A platoon regulation algorithm to improve the traffic performance of highway work zones. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2021; 36(7): 941–956.
54.
PendletonSDAndersenHDuXShenXMeghjaniM, et al. Perception, planning, control, and coordination for autonomous vehicles. Machines. 2017; 5(1): 6.
55.
ZhuHYuenKVMihaylovaLLeungH. Overview of environment perception for intelligent vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2017; 18(8): 2584–2601.
56.
RosiqueFNavarroPJFernándezCPadillaA. A systematic review of perception system and simulators for autonomous vehicles research. Sensors. 2019; 19(3): 648.
57.
LiuSGruverWAKotakDB. Holonic Coordination and Control of an Automated Guided Vehicle System. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2002; 9(3): 235–250.
58.
ArenaFPauG. An overview of vehicular communications. Future Internet. 2019; 11(2): 27.
59.
AbualhoulMYShagdarONashashibiF. Visible Light inter-vehicle Communication for platooning of autonomous vehicles. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2016, pp. 508–513.
60.
GrembekOKurzhanskiyAMeduryAVaraiyaPYuM. Making intersections safer with I2V communication. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2019; 102: 396–410.
61.
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic set of Applications; Part 2: Specification of Cooperative Awareness Basic Service, ETSI EN 302 637-2 V1.3.2, 2014.
62.
LyaminNVinelAJonssonMBellaltaB. Cooperative awareness in VANETs: On ETSI EN 302 637–2 performance. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2017; 67(1): 17–28.
63.
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic set of Applications; Part 3: Specification of Decentralized Environmental Notification Basic Service, ETSI EN 302 637-3 V1.2.1, 2014.
64.
SantaJPereniguez-GarciaFMoragónASkarmetaA. Experimental evaluation of CAM and DENM messaging services in vehicular communications. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2014; 46: 98–120.
65.
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic set of Applications; Analysis of the Collective Perception Service, Release 2, ETSI TR 103 562 V2.1.1, 2019.
66.
ACorrea, et al. On the Impact of V2X-based Maneuver Coordination on the Traffic. IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC2021-Spring), 2021, pp. 1–5.
67.
SalichsMAArmingolJMMorenoLEDe La EscaleraA. Localization System for Mobile Robots in Indoor Environments. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 1999; 6(4): 303–318.
68.
CoxIJ. Blanche: Position estimation for an autonomous root vehicle. In: Autonomous robot vehicles, Springer, NY, 1990, pp. 221–228.
69.
AynauCBernay-AngelettiCAufrereRLequievreLDebainC, et al. Real-time multisensor vehicle localization: A geographical information system. based approach. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2017; 24(3): 65–74.
70.
HasanHSHusseinMSaadSMDzahirMAM. An overview of local positioning system: Technologies, techniques and applications. International Journal of Engineering & Technology. 2018; 7(3.25): 1–5.
71.
Rios-TorresJMalikopoulosA. A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2016; 18(5): 1066–1077.
72.
MarianiSCabriGZambonelliF. Coordination of autonomous vehicles: taxonomy and survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 2021; 54(1): 1–33.
73.
GlorioNMarianiSCabriGZambonelliF. An Adaptive Approach for the Coordination of Autonomous Vehicles at Intersections. In: IEEE 30th Int. Conf. on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), Bayonne, France, 2021, pp. 1–6.
74.
BostelmanRHongTMadhavanR. Obstacle Detection Using a Time-of-Flight Range Camera for Automated Guided Vehicle Safety and Navigation. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2005; 12(3): 237–249.
75.
HaddadinADe LucaAAlbu-SchäfferA. Robot collisions: A survey on detection, isolation, and identification. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2017; 33(6): 1292–1312.
76.
DuRChenSLiYHaPYJDongJAnastasopoulosPCLabiS. A cooperative crash avoidance framework for autonomous vehicle under collision-imminent situations in mixed traffic stream. In: IEEE Int. Intelligent Transportation Systems Conf. (ITSC), 2021, pp. 1997–2002.
77.
WinklerASuchýJ. Vision based collision avoidance of industrial robots. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2011; 44(1): 9452–9457.
78.
WinklerASuchýJ. Intuitive collision avoidance of robots using charge generated virtual force fields. In: Advances in Robotics Research, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 77–87.
79.
KhatibO. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 1986; 5(1): 90–98.
80.
BosscherPHedmanD. Real-time collision avoidance algorithm for robotic manipulators. Industrial Robot: An International Journal. 2011.
81.
BistaSRWardBCorkeP. Image-based indoor topological navigation with collision avoidance for resource-constrained mobile robots. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2021; 102(3): 1–24.
82.
VerginisCKDimarogonasDV. Adaptive robot navigation with collision avoidance subject to 2nd-order uncertain dynamics. Automatica. 2021; 123: 109303.
83.
HafnerMCunninghamDCaminitiLDel VecchioD. Cooperative collision avoidance at intersections: Algorithms and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2013; 14(3): 1162–1175.
84.
DresnerKStoneP. A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2008; 31: 591–656.
85.
LamouikIYahyaouyASabriMA. Smart multi-agent traffic coordinator for autonomous vehicles at intersections. IEEE Int. Conf. on Adv. Technologies for Signal and Image Processing, 2017, pp. 1–6.
86.
NamaziELiJLuC. Intelligent intersection management systems considering autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access. 2019; 7: 91946–91965.
87.
HuXZeiglerBP. A Simulation-based Virtual Environment to Study Cooperative Robotic Systems. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2005; 12(4): 353–367.
88.
BuehlerMIagnemmaKSinghS (Eds.). The DARPA urban challenge: autonomous vehicles in city traffic, Springer, vol. 56, 2009.
89.
EkrenBYHeraguS. Simulation based performance analysis of an autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2011; 19(7): 1640–1650.
90.
BouniniFGingrasDLapointeVGruyerD. Real-time simulator of collaborative autonomous vehicles. Int. Conf. on Adv. in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 2014, pp. 723–729.
91.
KadeDWallmyrMHolsteinTLindellRÜreyHÖzcanO. Low-Cost Mixed Reality Simulator for Industrial Vehicle Environment. Int. Conf. on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 597–608.
92.
O’KellyMSinhaANamkoongHTedrakeRDuchiJC. Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31. arXiv:1811.00145, 2018.
93.
HuangWWangKLuYZhuF. Autonomous vehicles testing methods review. IEEE 19th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2016, pp. 163–168.
94.
HentoutAAouacheMMaoudjAAkliI. Human-robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017. Advanced Robotics. 2019; 33(15–16): 764–799.
95.
DąbrowskaAGielRWerbińska-WojciechowskaS. Human safety in autonomous transport systems–review and case study. Journal of KONBiN. 2021; 51(1): 57–71.
96.
LasotaPAFongTShahJA. A survey of methods for safe human-robot interaction. Foundations and Trends in Robotics. 2017; 5(4): 261–349.
97.
HalmeRJLanzMKämäräinenJPietersRLatokartanoJHietanenA. Review of vision-based safety systems for human-robot collaboration. Procedia CIRP. 2018; 72: 111–116.
SjobergKAndresPBuburuzanT, et al. Cooperative intelligent transport systems in Europe: Current deployment status and outlook. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine. 2017; 12(2): 89–97.
101.
HernándezCBermejo-AlonsoJSanzR. A Self-adaptation Framework Based on Functional Knowledge for Augmented Autonomy in Robots. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2018; 25(2): 157–172.
102.
MartíITomásVRGarcíaLAMartínezJJ. A Multi-agent System for Managing Adverse Weather Situations on the Road Network. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2010; 17(2): 145–155.
103.
SedanoJChiraCVillarJRAmbelEM. An Intelligent Route Management System for Electric Vehicle Charging. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2013; 20(4): 321–333.
104.
JingPHuHZhanFChenYShiY. Agent-based simulation of autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 79089–79103.
105.
KouNMPengCYanXYangZLiuHZhouKAnonymousAXuY. Multi-agent path planning with non-constant velocity motion. In: Proc. of the 18th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2019, pp. 2069–2071.
106.
MaHKoenigS. Optimal target assignment and path finding for teams of agents. In: Int. Conf. On Autonomous Agents and Multi Agents Systems (AAMAS), 2016, pp. 1144–1152.
107.
SternRSturtevantNRFelnerAKoenigSMaHWalkerTTAnonymousABoyarskiE. Multi-agent pathfinding: Definitions, variants, and benchmarks. In 12th A. Symp. on Combinatorial Search. 2019, pp. 151–159.
108.
van AartC. Organizational Principles for Multiagent Architectures. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 2005.
109.
GleizesM-P. Self-adaptative Complex Systems. In: CossentinoM. et al. (Eds). EUMAS 2011, LNAI 7541, 2012, pp. 114–128.
110.
De LemosRGieseHMüllerHAShawMAnderssonJ, et al. Software engineering for self-adaptive systems: A second research roadmap. In: Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 1–32.
111.
NahmYEIshikawaH. A hybrid multiagent system architecture for enterprise integration using computer networks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2005; 21(3): 217–234.
112.
FougèresA-J. A Modelling Approach Based on Fuzzy Agent. International Journal of Computer Science Issues. 2013; 9(6): 19–28.
113.
Fougères A-J.OstrosiE. Fuzzy agent-based approach for consensual design synthesis in product configuration. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2013; 20(3): 259–274.
114.
RaoufiMRobinson FayeA. Fuzzy agent-based modeling of construction crew motivation and performance. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2018; 32(5): 04018035.
115.
YildizBÇagdasG. Fuzzy logic in agent-based modeling of user movement in urban space: Definition and application to a case study of a square. Building and Environment. 2020; 169: 106597.
116.
HongTSNakhaeiniaDKarasfiB. Application of Fuzzy Logic in Mobile Robot Navigation, In: Fuzzy Logic: Controls, Concepts, Theories and Applications, Edited by Elmer P. Dadios, United Kingdom: IntechOpen, 2012.
117.
PradhanSKParhiDRPandaAK. Fuzzy logic techniques for navigation of several mobile robots. Applied Soft Computing. 2009; 9(1): 290–304.
118.
ZhaoRLeeDHLiTTLeeHK. Autnomous navigation of a mobile robot in unknown environment based on fuzzy inference. In Int. Automatic Control Conf, 2015, pp. 19–24.
119.
YerubandiVReddyYMKumarMV. Navigation system for an autonomous robot using fuzzy logic. Int. J. of Scientific and Research Publications. 2015; 5(2): 5–8.
120.
OmraneHMasmoudiMSMasmoudiM. Fuzzy logic based control for autonomous mobile robot navigation. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016.
121.
YudhaHMDewiTHasanaNRismaPOktariniYKartiniS. Performance comparison of fuzzy logic and neural network design for mobile robot navigation. Int. Conf. on Electrical Eng. and Comp. Sc., 2019, pp. 79–84.
122.
LiXChoiB-J. Design of Obstacle Avoidance System for Mobile Robot using Fuzzy Logic Systems. International Journal of Smart Home. 2013; 7(3): 321–328.
123.
MeylaniAHandayaniASCarlosRSHusniNLNurmainiSYaniI. Different Types of Fuzzy Logic in Obstacles Avoidance of Mobile Robot. Int. Conf. on Electrical. Eng. and Computer Sc., 2018, pp. 93–100.
124.
FaisalMHedjarRAl SulaimanMAl-MutibK. Fuzzy logic navigation and obstacle avoidance by a mobile robot in an unknown dynamic environment. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 2013; vol: 10.
125.
ShitsukaneACheriuyotWOtienoCMgalaM. A survey on obstacles avoidance mobile robot in static unknown environment. Int J Comput. 2018; 28(1): 160–173.
126.
PatleBKPandeyAParhiDRKJagadeeshA. A review: On path planning strategies for navigation of mobile robot. Defence Technology. 2019; 15(4): 582–606.
127.
NasrinaharAChuahJH. Intelligent motion planning of a mobile robot with dynamic obstacle avoidance. Journal on Vehicle Routing Algorithms. 2018; 1(2): 89–104.
128.
AlakhrasMOussalahMHusseinM. A survey of fuzzy logic in wireless localization. EURASIP J. on Wireless Communications and Networking. 2020; 1: 1–45.
129.
LeeMFRNugrohoA. Intelligent Energy Management System for Mobile Robot. Sustainability. 2022; 14(16): 10056.
130.
PandeyAPandeySParhiDR. Mobile robot navigation and obstacle avoidance techniques: A review. Int Rob Auto J. 2017; 2(3): 00022.
131.
WeissG. Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, 1999.
LeitãoP. Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: A state-of-the-art survey. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2009; 22: 979–991.
134.
Vogel-HeuserBLeeJLeitãoP. Agents enabling cyber-physical production systems. Automatisierungstechnik. 2015; 63(8): 777–789.
135.
WangXWongTNWangG. Service-oriented architecture for ontologies supporting multi-agent system negotiations in virtual enterprise. J. Intell. Manuf. 2010; 23(4): 1331–1349.
136.
Ghasem-AghaeeNÖrenTI. Towards Fuzzy Agents with Dynamic Personality for Human Behavior Simulation. Proceedings of SCSC 2003, Montreal, Canada, 2003, pp. 3–10.
137.
OstrosiEFougèresA-JFerneyM. Fuzzy Agents for Product Configuration in Collaborative and Distributed Design Process. Applied Soft Computing. 2012; 8(12): 2091–2105.
138.
BrunYSerugendoGDMGacekCGieseHKienleHLitoiuM, et al. Engineering self-adaptive systems through feedback loops. In Software Engineering for Self-adaptive Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 48–70.
139.
GrossetJFougèresA-JDjoko-KouamMBonninJ-M. Collective obstacle avoidance strategy–an agent-based simulation approach. Int. Conf. on Adv. in Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence (ASPAI’2022), Corfu, Greece, October 19–21, 2022.
140.
BechtsisDTsolakisNVlachosDSraiJS. Intelligent autonomous vehicles in digital supply chains: a framework for integrating innovations towards sustainable value networks. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 181: 60–71.
141.
MacalCM. Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation. 2016; 10(2): 144–156.
142.
DemirKADövenGSezenB. Industry 5.0 and human-robot co-working. Procedia Computer Science. 2019; 158: 688–695.
143.
ShiHZhouYWangXFuSGongSRanB. A deep reinforcement learning-based distributed connected automated vehicle control under communication failure. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2022; 37(15).
