This paper provides a novel method to design a Rainfall Forecasting System based on Neural Networks and a long-term data registry. The System proposed is based on the observations of expert meteorologists after 40 years of research developing local forecast methodologies to predict rainfall events in the Meteorological Observatory of Valladolid, Spain. The Geostrophic Wind, a theoretical value resulting of the balance between the Pressure Gradient Force and the Coriolis Force, is the key parameter which feeds the aforementioned System. The paper focuses on the Geostrophic Wind calculation. We propose a novel method to estimate its direction and magnitude on a local scale, by processing a set of pressure and temperature observations surrounding a central location. This study continues previous research, providing complementary criteria for numerical weather prediction systems based on time-series forecasting and neural networks.
World Meteorological Organization. Guidelines on Ensemble Prediction Systems and Forecasting. 2012; 32.
2.
LorenzEN. Section Of Planetary Sciences: The Predictability of Hydrodynamic Flow. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1963; Feb; 25(4) Series II: 409-432. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1963.tb01464.x.
3.
LorenzEN. Predictability – a problem partly solved. In: Predictability of Weather and Climate. PalmerTHagedornR, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006; 40-58. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511617652.004.
4.
LynchP. The emergence of numerical weather prediction: Richardson’s dream. Cambridge University Press. 2006; 290.
5.
RodríguezMA. Predicción meteorológica y caos en espacio-tiempo. Rev Esp Física. 2008; 22(1): 66-69.
6.
HuMJC. Application of the adaline system to weather forecasting. [PhD Thesis]. Stanford University: Department of Electrical Engineering; 1964.
7.
DubeyAD. Artificial neural network models for rainfall Prediction in pondicherry. Int J Comput Appl. 2015; 120(3): 30-35. doi: 10.5120/212103910.
8.
LittleJD. Weather forecasting expert system study: Final report to John F. Kennedy space center, national aeronautics and space administration. NASA. 1985; 165.
9.
CollopyFAdyaMArmstrongJS. Expert systems for forecasting. In: Armstrong JS, editor. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Boston, MA: Springer US. 2001; 285-300. doi: 10.1007/9780-306-47630-3_14.
10.
AdeliHMakKY. Architecture of a coupled expert system for optimum design of plate girder bridges. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 1988; 1(4): 277-285. doi: 10.1016/09521976(88)90046-2.
11.
BrecklingJ. The analysis of directional time series: Applications to wind speed and direction. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1989; 238.
12.
AhmedAKhalidM. Multi-step ahead wind forecasting using nonlinear autoregressive neural networks. In: Littlewood J, Howlett RJ, editors. Sustainability in Energy and Buildings2017; Proceedings of the Ninth KES International Conference. Chania, Greece; 2017. 192-204. doi: 10.1016/j.e.
13.
Ghosh-DastidarSAdeliH. Wavelet-clustering-neural network model for freeway incident detection. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng. 2003 Jun; 18(5): 325-338. doi: ([0-9]+)10.11.
14.
DoucoureBAgbossouKCardenasA. Time series prediction using artificial wavelet neural network and multi-resolution analysis: Application to wind speed data. Renew Energy. 2016; 92(C): 202-211. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.003.
15.
JiangXAdeliH. Dynamic wavelet neural Network for nonlinear identification of highrise buildings. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng. 2005; 20(5): 316-330. doi: 10.1111.
16.
Buendia-BuendiaFSTarquis AlfonsoAMBuendiaGAndinaD. Feature extraction via multiresolution MODWT analysis in a rainfall forecast system. In: Proceedings of the 12th; World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics: WMSCI 2008. Orlando, Florida, EEUU; 2008. 69-73.
17.
Buendia-BuendiaFSBuendía MoyaGAndinaD. Combining multiscale filtering and neural networks for local rainfall forecast. In: International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial ComputationFerrándezJMÁlvarez-SánchezJRde la PazFToledo MoreoJAdeliH, editors. IWINAC 2017; Proceedings; June 19-23, 2017, Corunna, Spain. Coruna, Spain: Springer; 2017. 481-490. doi: 10.1007/9783-319-59773-7_49.
SangsterWE. a Method of Representing the Horizontal Pressure Force Without Reduction of Station Pressures To Sea Level. JMeteorol. 1960 Abril; 17(2): 166-176. doi: 10.117.
20.
SangsterWE. An improved technique for computing the horizontal pressure-gradient force at the earth’s surface. Mon Weather Rev.1987 Jul; 115(7): 1358-1369. doi: 10.1175/15.
21.
MohrM. Problems with the mean sea level pressure field over the western united states. Mon Weather Rev. 2004 Aug; 132(8): 1952-1965. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132.
22.
RhodesRCWallcraftAJThompsonJD. Navy corrected geostrophic wind set for the gulf of mexico. Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity; 1985; 103.
23.
AddisonPS. The illustrated wavelet transform handbook: introductory theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and finance. CRC Press; 2002; 446.
24.
MallatSG. A wavelet tour of signal processing. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 1999. 637.
25.
PercivalDBWaldenAT. Wavelet methods for time series analysis. Cambridge University Press; 2000; 620.
26.
World Meteorological Organization. Compendium of meteorology – for use by class I and II Meteorological Personnel: Volume I, part 1 – Dynamic meteorology. WMO; 1973; 442. (WMO).
27.
WatsonGMHallidayJAPalutikofJPHoltTBarthelmieRJCoelinghJP, et al. Predicting Offshore Wind Energy Resources (Power). The European Commision; 2001; 22.
28.
ZhuXBowmanKPGentonMG. Incorporating geostrophic wind information for improved space – time short-term wind speed forecasting. Ann Appl Stat. 2014; Sep; 8(3): 1782-1799. doi: 10.1214/14AOAS756.
29.
OkumusIDinlerA. Current status of wind energy forecasting and a hybrid method for hourly predictions. Energy Convers Manag. 2016; Sep; 123: 362-371. doi: 10.1016/j..
30.
JungJBroadwaterRP. Current status and future advances for wind speed and power forecasting. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014; Mar; 31: 762-777. doi: 10.1016/J..
31.
World Meteorological Organization. Pressure Reduction Formula meeting minutes; 2012. 32.
32.
World Meteorological Organization. Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation. Vol. WMO-No. 8; 2010. 716.
33.
NewsomRKBrewerWAWilczakJMWolfeDEOncleySPLundquistJK. Validating precision estimates in horizontal wind measurements from a Doppler LIDAR. Atmospheric Meas Tech. 2017 Mar 30; 10(3): 1229-1240. doi: 10.5194/amt10-1229-2017.
34.
ZastrauDSchlaakMBrunsTElsnerRHerzogO. Differences in wind forecast accuracy in the german north and baltic seas. Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2014 Dec; 5(6): 575-580. doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2014.V5.549.
35.
NOAA/NDBC. Handbook of Automated Data Quality Control Checks and Procedures; 2009; 78.
36.
HoltonJR. An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology, Volume 88. 3rd; ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 1992. 511.
