The 2020 pandemic yielded significant changes to work – most notable was the shift from centralized to remote work. As employers called for the return to traditional office settings, workers resumed daily commutes to/from the workplace, resurrecting stressors like work overload, time constraints, and commuting strain.
OBJECTIVE:
We investigate (1) how commute strain affects employees’ work frustration, burnout, and satisfaction, and (2) how supportive supervisors and work climates may attenuate its negative implications.
METHODS:
Using a snowball sample of 403 workplace commuters obtained through various social media, we examined worker perceptions of commute strain, frustration, burnout, and dissatisfaction. We tested mediation and moderation hypotheses using OLS path modeling via the SPSS PROCESS macro.
RESULTS:
Results indicate that commute strain adversely affects work frustration, burnout, and job satisfaction. The negative frustration/satisfaction and burnout/satisfaction relationships were moderated by supervisor support and work climate, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
As more workers resume the daily commute, employers must be sensitive to the added strain associated with commuting and working while commuting as well as the serious downstream consequences of these strains. Fortunately, employers can moderate the severity of these consequences through supportive supervisors and work climates.
PoudelN, SingletonPA. Analyzing simple work time and commute time tradeoffs for insights into components of the value of travel time savings. Travel Behav Soc. 2022;28:330–7.
JachimowiczJM, CunninghamJL, StaatsBR, GinoF, MengesJI. Between home and work: Commuting as an opportunity for role transitions. Org Sci. 2021;32(1):64–85.
8.
CarlsonDS, KacmarKM. Work– family conflict in the organization: Do life role values make a difference?J Management. 2000 Oct;26(5):1031–54.
9.
TrenberthL, DeweP. The importance of leisure as a means of coping with work related stress: An exploratory study. Couns Psychol Q. 2002;15(1):59–72.
10.
EvansGW, WenerRE, PhillipsD. The morning rush hour: Predictability and commuter stress. Environment and Behav. 2002;34(4):521–30.
11.
LorenzO. Does commuting matter to subjective well-being?J Transp Geogr. 2018;66:180–99.
12.
JainJ, LyonsG. The gift of travel time. J Transp Geogr. 2008;16(2):81–9.
13.
MeijmanTF, MulderG. Psychological aspects of workload. In A handbook of work and organizational psychology, Psychology Press, 2013, pp. 15–44.
14.
GeurtsSA, SonnentagS. Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scand J Work Environ Health (2006)482–92.
15.
LyonsG, ChatterjeeK. A human perspective on the daily commute: Costs, benefits and trade-offs. Transport Reviews. 2008;28(2):181–98.
16.
NovacoRW, StokolsD, MilanesiL. Objective and subjectivedimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuting stress. University of California Transportation Center. [internet]. 1990 [cited 2022 Sept 6]. Available from https://escholarshiorg/content/qt5jq8164z/qt5jq8164z.pdf.
17.
NovacoRW, GonzalezOI. Commuting and well-being. Technology and Well-Being. 2009;3:174–4.
18.
GreenhausJH, BeutellNJ. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Management Rev. 1985;10(1):76–88.
19.
AshforthBE, KreinerGE, FugateM. All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad Management Rev. 2000;25(3):472–91.
20.
KreinerGE. Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. J Organ Behav: Int J Industrial, Occupational and Org Psychol Behav. 2006;27(4):485–507.
21.
Künn-NelenA. Does commuting affect health?Health Econ. 2016;25(8):984–1004.
22.
LazarusRS. Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. Springer publishing company; 2006.
.
23.
ErnstKossek E, OzekiC. Work– family conflict, policies, and the job– life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior– human resources research. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(2):139.
24.
BakkerAB, DemeroutiE. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J Managerial Psychol. 2007.
25.
LyonBL. Stress, coping, and health. Handbook of stress, coping and health: Implications for nursing research, theory, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 2–21.
26.
NovacoRW, KliewerW, BroquetA. Home environment consequences of commute travel impedance. 1991Am J of Community Psych. 19;881–909.
27.
PetersLH, O’ConnorEJ, RudolfCJ. The behavioral and affective consequences of performance-relevant situational variables. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1980;25(1):79–96.
28.
KeenanA, NewtonTJ. Frustration in organizations: Relationships to role stress, climate, and psychological strain. J Occupational Psychol. 1984;57(1):57–65.
29.
MaslachC, SchaufeliWB, LeiterMP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):397–422.
30.
StrayerDL, CastroSC, TurrillJ, CooperJM. The persistence of distraction: The hidden costs of intermittent multitasking. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2022.
31.
NavonD, GopherD. On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychol Rev. 1979;86(3):214.
WickensCD. Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):449–55.
34.
WickensCD, GutzwillerRS, SantamariaA. Discrete task switching in overload: A meta-analyses and a model. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2015;79:79–84.
35.
LeroyS, SchmidtAM, MadjarN. Working from home during COVID- A study of the interruption landscape. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(10):1448.
36.
MorganB, D’MelloS, AbbottR, RadvanskyG, HaassM, TamplinA. Individual differences in multitasking ability and adaptability. Hum Factors. 2013;55(4):776–88.
37.
PikosAK. The causal effect of multitasking on work-related mental health. The more you do, the worse you feel. Hannover Economic Papers (HEP); 2017.
38.
AshforthBE, KreinerGE, FugateM. All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad Management Rev. 2000;25(3):472–91.
39.
GlazerS, BeehrTA. Consistency of implications of three role stressors across four countries. J Organ Behav: Int J Industrial, Occupational and Org Psychol Behav. 2005;26(5):467–87.
40.
LazarJ, JonesA, HackleyM, ShneidermanB. Severity and impact of computer user frustration: A comparison of student and workplace users. Interact Comput. 2006;18(2):187–207.
41.
BakkerAB, DemeroutiE. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J Managerial Psychol. 2007.
42.
MaslachC, JacksonSE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113.
43.
BurtonJ, World Health Organization. WHO healthy workplace framework and model: Background and supporting literature and practices. World Health Organization; 2010.
SchaufeliWB, LeiterMP, MaslachC. Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development Int (2009)204–20.
46.
MaslachC, LeiterMP. Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103–11.
47.
RothmannS. Job satisfaction, occupational stress, burnout and work engagement as components of work-related wellbeing. SA J Ind Psychol. 2008;34(3):11–6.
48.
Estévez-MujicaCP, QuintaneE. E-mail communication patterns and job burnout. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193966.
49.
BakkerAB, HeuvenE. Emotional dissonance, burnout, and in-role performance among nurses and police officers. Int J Stress Manag. 2006;13(4):423.
50.
KossekEE, LautschBA, EatonSC. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work– family effectiveness. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68(2):347–67.
51.
LandryG, VandenbergheC. Relational commitments in employee– supervisor dyads and employee job performance. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(3):293–308.
52.
LewigKA, DollardMF. Emotional dissonance, emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction in call centre workers. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2003;12(4):366–92.
53.
PetersP, DenDulk L, de RuijterJ. May I work from home? Views of the employment relationship reflected in line managers’ telework attitudes in six financial-sector organizations. Equal Divers Incl. 2010.
54.
KossekEE, PichlerS, BodnerT, HammerLB. Workplace social support and work– family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work– family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Pers Psychol. 2011;64(2):289–313.
55.
SchneiderB, EhrhartMG, MaceyWH. Organizational climate research. The handbook of organizational culture and climate. Sage. 2011;29:12169–012.
56.
DeConinckJB, StilwellCD. Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions. J Bus Res. 2004;57(3):225–31.
57.
BeauregardTA, HenryLC. Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Hum Res Mgt Rev. 2009;19(1):9–22.
58.
BrislinRW. Cross-cultural research methods. In Environment and culture. Springer, Boston, MA, 1980, pp. 47–82.
KlugerAN. Commute variability and strain. J Organ Behav: Int J Industrial, Occupational and Org Psychol Behav. 1998;19(2):147–65.
62.
PetersLH, O’ConnorEJ, RudolfCJ. The behavioral and affective consequences of performance-relevant situational variables. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1980;25(1):79–96.
63.
KristensenTS, BorritzM, VilladsenE, ChristensenKB. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress. 2005;19(3):192–207.
64.
CammannC, FichmanM, JenkinsD, KleshJ. Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In Seashore S, Lawler E, Mirvis P, Cammann C. New York: Wiley,1983, 563 pages.
65.
GreenhausJH, ParasuramanS, WormleyWM. Supervisory support measure. Acad Management J. 1990.
66.
LitwinG, StringerR. Motivation and Organizational Climate. Harvard University Press, Boston. 1968.
67.
HairJFJr, HultGT, RingleCM, SarstedtM. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications, 2021.
68.
HubonaGS, SchuberthF, HenselerJ. A clarification of confirmatory composite analysis (CCA). Int J Info Manag (2021)61.
69.
HayesAF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication monographs. 2009;76(4):408–20.
70.
PreacherKJ, HayesAF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004;36(4):717–31.
71.
HayesAF. Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs. 2018;85(1):4–0.
72.
ShroutPE, BolgerN. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(4):422.
73.
ZhaoX, LynchJGJr, ChenQ. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res. 2010;37(2):197–206.
MacKinnonDP, LockwoodCM, WilliamsJ. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav Res. 2004;39(1):99–128.
Amponsah-TawiahK, AnnorF, ArthurBG. Linking commuting stress to job satisfaction and turnover intention: The mediating role of burnout. J Workplace Behav Health. 2016;31(2):104–23.
78.
TeodoroviczT, KunAL, SadunR, ShaerO. Multitasking while driving: A time use study of commuting knowledge workers to assess current and future uses. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2022;162:102789.
79.
JachimowiczJM, CunninghamJL, StaatsBR, GinoF, MengesJI. Between home and work: Commuting as an opportunity for role transitions. Org Sci.. 2021;32(1):64–85.
HairJFJ, BlackWC, BabinBJ, AndersonRE. Multivariate Data Analysis7th Edition. Prentice Hall; 2010, 860 p.
83.
HayesAF, MontoyaAK, RockwoodNJ. The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australas Marketing J (AMJ). 2017;25(1):76–81.
84.
Appel-MeulenbroekR, KempermanA, van de Water A, Weijs-PerréeM, VerhaeghJ. How to attract employees back to the office? A stated choice study on hybrid working preferences. J Environ Psychol. 2022;81:101784.
85.
GerpottFH, RivkinW, UngerD. Stop and go, where is my flow? How and when daily aversive morning commutes are negatively related to employees’ motivational states and behavior at work. J Appl Psychol. 2021.
86.
SpagnoliP, MolinoM, MolinaroD, GiancasproML, ManutiA, GhislieriC. Workaholism and technostress during the COVID-19 emergency: The crucial role of the leaders on remote working. Front Psychol. 2020;11:620310.
87.
WieseBS, ChailliéO, NoppeneyR, StertzAM. Daily experiences of commuting strain and self-control at work and at home: A diary study with train travelers. J Pers Psychol. 2020;19(3):125.
88.
NorgateSH, Cooper-RyanAM, LavinS, StonierC, CooperCL. The impact of public transport on the health of work commuters: A systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2020;14(2):325–44.
