TQM in health care institutions is a method for improving the effectiveness of work in general, and it is the view of the administration that tries to communicate with all stakeholders in the organization to achieve high-quality continuous improvement.
OBJECTIVE:
The objectives of the study are to analyses the feasibility of TQM in the public health organization in Ethiopia. This study deals with the implementation of the health organization by evaluating the performance of TQM.
METHODS:
The target sample was selected using the stratified random sampling method and also takes into account the quantitative methodological framework. The study is based on the Descriptive Approaches, focusing on the analysis of the sample and the main characteristics of its members.
RESULTS:
The study results show that there is significant awareness of TQM principles, benefits achieved by the TQM application, obstacles hampered by TQM application, and there are statistically significant differences in perception practitioners of the nursing profession to the importance of TQM application in the public healthcare organization in Ethiopia.
CONCLUSIONS:
Several conclusions were drawn on the subject of this study to propose appropriate recommendations for management. This study strongly recommended that hospital management should make efforts to create an advanced information system to effectively ensure TQM.
RajabionL, NazariN, BandarchiM, et alKnowledge sharing mechanisms in virtual communities: A review of the current literature and recommendations for future research. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:365–84.
2.
FaloudahAA, QasimS, BahumaydM. Total Quality Management in Healthcare. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2015;120:22–4.
3.
CiecioraM. Challenges connected with building a motivation system for programmers in Poland – A pilot study. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:339–46.
4.
BoštjančičE, PetrovčičA. Exploring the relationship between job satisfaction, work engagement and career satisfaction: The study from public university. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:411–22.
5.
SiamaAZ, AlkhateebK, Al-WaqqadS. The Role of Information Systems in Implementing Total Quality Management. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2012;9:666–72.
6.
ZameerH, WangY, YasmeenH, et alCorporate image and customer satisfaction by virtue of employee engagement. Human Systems Management. 2018;37:233–48.
7.
BourantaN, PsomasE, Suárez-barrazaMF, et alstudy The key factors of total quality management in the service sector: a cross-cultural study. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2019;20:1–29.
8.
MohideenOMH, VijayavelJ. Principles of total quality management (TQM) governing automotive industries with reference to skill enhancement and capacity addition. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Business Management. 2014;2:36–41.
9.
BoadiPO, GuoxinL, AntwiP. Customer satisfaction, co-creation intentions and diligent business response. Human Systems Management. 2017;36:251–7.
10.
HangesMAC. Managing Technical Professionals: Things to Remember (Part 2). IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2017;45:13–4.
11.
YangC. The influence of income and working time of rural migrant workers on health: The mediating effect of life stress and the moderating effect of marital status. Human Systems Management. 2020;39:69–80.
12.
SwainGR. How does economic and social disadvantage affect health?Focus (Madison). 2016;33:1–6.
13.
ShortPJ. Total quality management in hospitals. Total Quality Management. 2017;6:255–64.
14.
BalasubramanianM. Total Quality Management [TQM] in the Healthcare Industry – Challenges, Barriers and Implementation Developing a Framework for TQM Implementation in a Healthcare Setup. Science Journal of Public Health. 2016;4:271–8.
15.
SadikRM. Impact of Total Quality Management on Customer Satisfaction (E-Services). International Journal of Advances in Computer Science and Technology. 2018;7:31–5.
16.
ArriveJT, FengM. The complexity of the environment, management control and firm performance. Business strategy and environment. 2018;27:1347–1354.
17.
GeteleGK, LiT, ArriveTJ. Risk management in Service Supply Chain: Evidence From the healthcare Sector. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2019;47:1–10.
18.
NovakA, BreznikK. How leaders can initiate knowledge management in organizations: Role of leadership style in building knowledge infrastructure. Human Systems Management. 2020;39:37–50.
19.
SinghH, SinghB. Total quality management: today’s business excellence International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences. 2014;32:188–96.
20.
AbbasW, WuW. Employee innovativeness, fairness and organizational support: An empirical assessment. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:169–77.
21.
AbbasW, WuW. The moderating role of intrapreneurial personality in relation between leader humility and innovative behavior. Human Systems Managemen.t. 2019;38:329–37.
22.
WikiTH. Leadership and Management or Leading and Managing. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2017;45:6–8.
23.
QuarterS. Systems Thinking: Three System Archetypes Every Manager Should Know. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2018;46:32–41.
24.
QuarterT. HRM’s Importance Throughout the Organization: Analyzed Through the Concepts and Views Portrayed in Eli Goldratt’s The Goal. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2017;45:54–63.
25.
PaliukasV, SavanevičienėA. Harmonization of rational and creative decisions in quality management using AI technologies. Economics and Business. 2018;32:195–208.
26.
JoséÁlvarez-García, Río-RamaM de la C del, Miras-RodríguezM del M. How Do Quality Practices Affect the Results?: The Experience of Thalassotherapy Centres in Spain. Sustainability. 2017;9:1–19.
27.
AhmadAA, Al-hamdanZM. Total quality management in the health-care context: integrating the literature and directing future research. Risk Management Healthc Policy. 2019;12:167–77.
28.
ChandraPV. A Study on Implementation of Total Quality Management in Businesses. In ternational Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology. 2013;2:440–6.
29.
RangkutiZ, MangestiS. The effects of Tier-1 capital to risk management, and profitability on performance using multiple fixed effect panel data model. Human Systems Management. 2020;39:117–28.
30.
Al-DamenRA. The impact of Total Quality Management on organizational performance Case of Jordan Oil Petroleum Company. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2017;8:192–202.
31.
LinC, ChuangH, ShihD. Development stage and relationship of mis and tqm in the e-business era. International journal of electronic business management. 2012;10:50–60.
32.
DjikhyS, MoustaghfirK. International faculty, knowledge transfer, and innovation in higher education: A human resource development perspective. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:423–31.
33.
ShahzadK, JianqiuZ, SardarT, et alHospital information-system (HIS) acceptance: A physician’s stance. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:159–68.
34.
SupriyantoS. Compensation effects on job satisfaction and performance. Human Systems Management. 2018;37:281–5.
