The information communication technology (ICT) and networking are playing a significant role in supporting and empowering women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. We focused on four core factors that greatly influence women entrepreneurs and studied them through structural equation modeling (SEM) in AMOS 22 software. Our results show that family support positively affects the success of women entrepreneurs. Besides, the education level and knowledge of ICT and networking are empowering women entrepreneurs. We also conclude that networking relations through ICT tools positively aid women entrepreneurs in case where face to face meetings are not possible. The educated women can effectively use ICT and networking tools to become a successful entrepreneur. This work provides important understanding about the role of ICT and networking tools in empowering women entrepreneurs of Pakistan.
JackSL, AndersonAR. Entrepreneurship education within the enterprise culture: Producing reflective practitioners. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 1999;5(3):110–25.
2.
BasuA, GoswamiA. Determinants of south Asian entrepreneurial growth in Britain: A multivariate analysis. Small Business Economics. 1999;13(1):57–70.
3.
BrushCG, BruinAD, WelterF. A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 2009;1(1):8–24.
4.
AhlH. Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2006;30(5):595–621.
5.
GillR. Globalization and intersectionality in US discourses and practices of entrepreneurship. EGOS Symposium June. Gothenburg, Sweden, 2011.
6.
NeergaardH, FrederiksenSH, MarlowS. The emperor’s new clothes: Rendering a feminist theory of entrepreneurship visible1. ICSB World Conference Proceedings. 2011;1–36.
7.
BruniA, GherardiS, PoggioB. Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender, Work & Organization. 2004;11(4):406–29.
8.
CesaroniFM, PaoloniP. Are family ties an opportunity or an obstacle for women entrepreneurs? Empirical evidence from Italy. Palgrave Communications. 2016;2(1):1–7.
9.
WelshDHB, MemiliE, KaciakE. An empirical analysis of the impact of family moral support on Turkish women entrepreneurs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2016;1(1):3–12.
10.
AdjeiEK, ErikssonRH, LindgrenU, HolmE. Familial relationships and firm performance: The impact of entrepreneurial family relationships. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2019;31(5-6):357–77.
11.
SinhaS. Developing women entrepreneurs in south Asia: Issues, initiatives and experiences. United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2005.
12.
BirleyS, WestheadP. Growth and performance contrasts between ‘types’ of small firms. Strategic Management Journal. 1990;11(7):535–57.
13.
DenisonDR, AlexanderJM. Patterns and profiles of entrepreneurs: Data from entrepreneurship forums. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. 1986;578–93.
14.
HisrichRD, BrushCG. Women entrepreneurs: A longitudinal study. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. 1987;187(1):566–78.
15.
ShaperoA. The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur. Psychology Today. 1975;9(6):83–8.
16.
NguyenM. Women entrepreneurs: Turning disadvantages into advantages. Pre-Flight Ventures. 2005;1:2012.
17.
BrownRC. Access to finance for women in business: Myths or realities. Keynote address at the International Conference for Women in SMMEs, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 1997.
18.
ChandralekhaK, LavoieDF, AparnaI. Making of rural entrepreneurs-role of support systems. Internationalising Entrepreneurship Conference in Bunbury, Australia, 1995.
19.
GundryLK, MiriamBY, PosigM. Contemporary perspectives on women’s entrepreneurship: A review and strategic recommendations. Journal of Enterprising Culture. 2002;10(1):67–86.
20.
HelmsMM. Women and entrepreneurship: The appealing alternative. Business Perspectives. 1997;10(1):16–20.
21.
HamiltonD. An ‘ecological’ basis for the analysis of gender differences in predisposition to self-employment. Scottish Enterprise Foundation. 1990.
22.
StonerCR, HartmanRI, AroraR. Work-home role conflict in female owners of small businesses: An exploratory study. Journal of Small Business Management. 1990;28(1):30–8.
23.
WinnJ. Women entrepreneurs: Can we remove the barriers?The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2005;1(3):381–97.
24.
ZhangX, VenkateshV. Explaining employee job performance: The role of online and offline workplace communication networks. MIS Quarterly. 2013;37(3):695–722.
25.
KilduffM, BrassDJ. Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. The Academy of Management Annals. 2010;4(1):317–57.
26.
SykesTA, VenkateshV, GosainS. Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees’ system use. MIS Quarterly. 2009;33(2):371–93.
27.
BurtRS. The social structure of competition. Networks and Organizations. 1992;57–91.
28.
BrindleyC. Barriers to women achieving their entrepreneurial potential: Women and risk. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2005;11(2):144–61.
29.
DhaliwalS. Silent contributors: Asian female entrepreneurs and women in business. Women’s Studies International Forum. 1998;21(5):463–74.
30.
OrhanM, ScottD. Why women enter into entrepreneurship: An explanatory model. Women in Management Review. 2001;16(5):232–47.
31.
McClellandE, SwailJ, BellJ, IbbotsonP. Following the pathway of female entrepreneurs: A six-country investigation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2005;11(2):84–107.
32.
NdubisiNO, KahramanC. Malaysian women entrepreneurs: Understanding the ICT usage behaviors and drivers. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2005;18(6):721–39.
33.
MartinLM, WrightLT. No gender in cyberspace? Empowering entrepreneurship and innovation in female-run ICT small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2005;11(2):162–78.
34.
FieldenSL, DaweA. Entrepreneurship and social inclusion. Women in Management Review. 2004;19(3):139–42.
35.
LinN. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology. 1999;25(1):467–87.
36.
HairJF, SarstedtM, RingleCM, MenaJA. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2012;40(3):414–33.
37.
ShahzadK, JianqiuZ, ZiaMA, ShaheenA, SardarT. Essential factors for adopting hospital information system: A case study from Pakistan. International Journal of Computers and Applications. 2018:1–12.
38.
WetzelsM, Odekerken-SchröderG, OppenCV. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly. 2009;33(1):177–95.
39.
VenkateshV, RaiA, SykesTA, AljafariR. Combating infant mortality in rural India: Evidence from a field study of ehealth kiosk imlementations. MIS Quarterly. 2016;40(2):353–80.
40.
ZhaoXY, FreseM, GiardiniA. Business owners’ network size and business growth in China: The role of comprehensive social competency. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 2010;22(7-8):675–705.
41.
GoheerNA. Women entrepreneurs in Pakistan, how to improve their bargaining power. ILO InFocus Programme. SEED Geneva and ILO Islamabad. 2003.
42.
HinsonRE. Banking the poor: The role of mobiles. Journal of Financial Services Marketing. 2011;15(4):320–33.
43.
BestML, MaierS. Gender, culture and ICT use in rural south India. Gender, Technology and Development. 2007;11(2):137–55.
