This empirical study’s intent was to assess the role that remittances play in the economic growth and self-development of low-income country regions. The diverse results in previous studies necessitate using a proper methodological approach. Namely panel co-integration analysis allows gauging the long-run interactions among growth, remittances, and self-development. Having confirmed, via the augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test, the dynamic equilibrium of the data, gleaned from 31 low-income countries over the 1991–2015 time period, the cointegration between economic growth and remittances was established through the Johansen panel test. Pertinent to heterogeneous cointegrated panels, the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) results show that remittances have a significant, positive effect on long-term economic growth. Besides, the study’s empirical results also unconceal the significant, long-term effects of economic growth and remittances, facilitating self-development in low-income regions, in terms of finance, savings, trade, and labor-force participation, except that of household consumption. And an endogeneity test strongly suggests the need for policymaking towards obtaining maximum benefits from the increased inflows of remittances. Despite its limitations, the study offers pragmatic policymaking recommendations, along with future research directions.
ImaiKS, GaihaR, AliA, KaickerN. Remittances, growth and poverty: New evidence from Asian countries. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2014;36:524–38.
2.
GeorgantzasNC. Humanizing HSM to benefit human systems. Human Systems Management. 2018;37:1–5.
3.
HomeSM. Worldwide Remittance Flows to Developing Countries. International Fund for Agriculturian Developing. Rome. Italy.–2007.–18 pp. 2007.
4.
KumarRR. Remittances and economic growth: A study of Guyana. Economic Systems. 2013;37:462–72.
5.
JahjahMS, ChamiMR, FullenkampC. Are immigrant remittance flows a source of capital for development: International Monetary Fund, 2003.
6.
SirkeciI, CohenJH, RathaD. Migration and remittances during the global financial crisis and beyond: World Bank Publications, 2012.
7.
ChimhowuA, PiesseJ, PinderC. The socioeconomic impact of remittances on poverty reduction, Remittances: Development Impact and Future Prospects. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, 2005, pp. 83–102.
8.
BerdievAN, KimY, ChangC-P. Remittances and corruption. Economics Letters. 2013;118:182–85.
9.
HesselsJ, Van GelderenM,
ThurikR. Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers. Small Business Economics. 2008;31:323–39.
10.
De HaasH. International migration, remittances and development: Myths and facts. Third World Quarterly. 2005;26:1269–84.
11.
MasseyDS, ArangoJ, HugoG, KouaouciA, PellegrinoA, TaylorJE. Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review. 1993;431–66.
12.
GiannettiM, FedericiD, RaitanoM. Migrant remittances and inequality in Central-Eastern Europe. International Review of Applied Economics. 2009;23:289–307.
13.
AirolaJ. The use of remittance income in Mexico. International Migration Review. 2007;41:850–9.
14.
JenningsA, ClarkeM. The development impact of remittances to Nicaragua. Development in Practice. 2005;15:685–91.
15.
PoirineB. A theory of remittances as an implicit family loan arrangement. World Development. 1997;25:589–611.
16.
StephenaF, UrbanobD, HemmenbSV. The Impact of Institutions on Entrepreneural Activity. ed: Wiley Inter Science, 2005.
17.
RapoportH, DocquierF. The economics of migrants’ remittances. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. 2006;2:1135–98.
18.
FainiR. Migration, remittances and growth. in Poverty, International Migration and Asylum, ed: Springer. 2005, pp. 171–187.
19.
Ruiz-ArranzM, GiulianoP. Remittances, financial development, and growth: International Monetary Fund, 2005.
20.
AdamsRH, PageJ. Do international migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries?World Development. 2005;33:1645–69.
21.
BarajasA, ChamiR, FullenkampC, GapenM, MontielPJ. Do workers remittances promote economic growth?IMF Working Papers, 2009, pp. 1–22.
22.
KaragözK, Workers remittances and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Yaşar University. 2009;4:1891–908.
23.
CraigwellR, JackmanM, MooreW. Economic volatility and remittances. International Journal of Development Issues. 2010;9:25–42.
24.
MundacaBG, Remittances financial market development and economic growth: The case of Latin America and the Caribbean. Review of Development Economics. 2009;13:288–303.
25.
SiddiqueA, SelvanathanEA, SelvanathanS. Remittances and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. Journal of Development Studies. 2012;48:1045–62.
26.
FayissaB, NsiahC. Remittances and Economic Growth in Africa, Asia, and Latin American-Caribbean Countries: A Panel Unit Root and Panel Cointegration Analysis, 2011.
27.
AhmedAD, WahidAN. Financial structure and economic growth link in African countries: A panel cointegration analysis. Journal of Economic Studies. 2011;38:331–57.
28.
GuptaS, PattilloCA, WaghS. Effect of remittances on poverty and financial development in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development. 2009;37:104–15.
29.
BettinG, LucchettiR, ZazzaroA. Endogeneity and sample selection in a model for remittances. Journal of Development Economics. 2012;99:370–84.
30.
UddinGS, SjöB. Remittances, Financial Development and Economic Growth in Bangladesh. South Asia Economic Journal. 2013;14:261–73.
31.
SinghRJ, HaackerM, LeeK-W, Le GoffM. Determinants and macroeconomic impact of remittances in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies. 2011;20:312–40.
32.
CombesJ-L, EbekeC, EtoundiMN, YogoT. Are foreign aid and remittance inflows a hedge against food price shocks?2012.
33.
BugamelliM, PaternòF. Output growth volatility and remittances. Economica. 2011;78:480–500.
34.
EbekeC, CombesJ-L. Do remittances dampen the effect of natural disasters on output growth volatility in developing countries?Applied Economics. 2013;45:2241–54.
35.
AnzoateguiD, Demirgüç-KuntA, PeríaMSM. Remittances and financial inclusion: Evidence from El Salvador. World Development. 2014;54:338–49.
36.
ÅngmanJ, LarssonP. Remittances and Development: Empirical evidence from 99 developing countries, ed, 2014.
37.
IrdamD, The impact of remittances on human development: A quantitative analysis and policy implications. Sociology. 2012;5:74–95.
38.
MadaniF, MuharremiO, PelariE. The Effect Remittances Have on the Living Standards of Albanians and on Country’s GDP. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2013;4:415.
39.
SawyerA. “Is money enough?: The effect of migrant remittances on parental aspirations and youth educational attainment in rural Mexico,”International Migration Review. 2016;50:231–66.
40.
GounderR, Does Remittances Finance Welfare Development? Evidence from the South Pacific Island Nation of Fiji. In Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences, 2014.
41.
Hatemi-JA, ShamsuddinM. The causal interaction between financial development and human development in Bangladesh. Applied Economics Letters. 2016;23:995–8.
42.
LevinA, LinC-F, ChuC-SJ. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics. 2002;108:1–24.
43.
MaddalaGS, WuS. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 1999;61:631–52.
44.
FisherR, Statistical methods for research workers (London: Oliver and Boyd). Legends to Figures, 1932.
45.
PedroniP. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory. 2004;20:597–625.
46.
MacKinnonJG, HaugAA, MichelisL. Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 1999;14:563–77.
47.
PedroniP. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. in Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, ed: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2001, pp. 93–130.
48.
GrangerCW, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1969;424–38.
