This study assesses the relation between the diffusion of information and communications technology (ICT) and the environmentally sustainable development (SusD). The generalized method of moments (GMM) is used for analyzing the dissemination of ICT in South Asian countries, during the 2005–2015 time period. A panel cointegration test examined five variables pertinent to ICT diffusion. Said variables coalesce, providing conclusive information about the relation between the ICT and SusD constructs. The study’s empirical results affirm the positive relation between ICT and environmentally sustainable development, with minor disparities among the pertinent variables in the long term. These findings indicate that ICT and SusD are proportional to each other unless other considerations drastically change, such as the environment, culture, human behavior and education. Lastly, in the context of future policy design and research, ICT circumstances can be seen as significantly shifting an entire region’s sustainable development and economic growth.
ZelenyM., High technology management, Human systems management6(2) (1986), 109–120.
2.
GeorgantzasN.C. and ZarifopoulouV., Politeia in person: A civic Eros cookbook for human beings’ economic prosperity 2017, Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing (May 24, 2017). 448.
3.
LeeJ.W. and BrahmasreneT., ICT, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Panel of ASEAN, Global Economic Review43(2) (2014).
4.
PradhanR.P., ArvinM.B. and NormanN.R., The dynamics of information and communications technologies infrastructure, economic growth, and financial development: Evidence from Asian countries, Technology in Society42 (2015), 135–149.
5.
TjoaA.M. and TjoaS., The Role of ICT to Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), in ICT for Promoting Human Development and Protecting the Environment: 6th IFIP World Information Technology Forum, WITFOR 2016, San José, Costa Rica, September 12-14, 2016, Proceedings, MataF.J. and PontA., Editors. 2016, Springer International Publishing: Cham, 3–13.
6.
DyllickT. and HockertsK., Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability, Bus Strat Environ11(2) (2002), 130e141.
7.
KhanH. and KhanI.U., From growth to sustainable development in developing countries: A conceptual framework, Environmental Economics3(1) (2012), 23–31.
8.
JeffersonT., et al., The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America. in Washington, DC: United States Congress, National Archives and Records Administration. 1776.
9.
LeidigM., TeeuwR.M. and GibsonA.D., Data poverty: A global evaluation for 2009 to 2013-implications for sustainable development and disaster risk reduction, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation50 (2016), 1–9.
10.
HoustonJ.B., et al., Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research, Disasters39(1) (2015), 1–22.
11.
TeltscherS., MagpantayE., VallejoI., KreuzenbeckL., KorkaD., GrayV. and PoupaertO., Measuring the Information Society., 2012, Geneva: International Telecommunications Union.
12.
ErumbanA.A. and DasD.K., Information and communication technology and economic growth in India, Telecommunications Policy40(5) (2016), 412–431.
13.
VeeramacheneniB., EkanayakeE.M. and VogelR., Information technology and economic growth: A causal analysis, Southwestern Economic Review34 (2011), 75–88.
14.
BekhetH.A. and Bt OthmanN.S., Causality analysis among electricity consumption, consumer expenditure, gross domestic product (GDP) and foreign direct investment (FDI): Case study of Malaysia, Journal of Economics and International Finance3(4) (2011), 228.
15.
YazdanG.F. and HosseinS.S.M., FDI and ICT effects on productivity growth, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences93 (2013), 1710–1715.
16.
WatkinsA. and MeijerC.J., Implementing Inclusive Education: Issues in Bridging the Policy-Practice Gap. 2016: Emerald Group Publishing.
17.
Turner-CmuchalM. and AitkenS., ICT as a Tool for Supporting Inclusive Learning Opportunities. In Implementing Inclusive Education: Issues in Bridging the Policy-Practice Gap. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2016, 159–180.
18.
MirzajaniH., MahmudR., Fauzi Mohd AyubA. and WongS.L., Teachers’ acceptance of ICT and its integration in the classroom, Quality Assurance in Education24(1) (2016), 26–40.
19.
MogotlhwaneT.M., TalibM. and MokwenaM., Role of ICT in Reduction of Poverty in Developing Countries: Botswana as an Evidence in SADC Region. in International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications. 2011. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
20.
ShastryA.K., Govt. announces list of first 20 smart cities under ‘Smart Cities Mission’, in The Hindu 2016, The Indian Express: New Delhi.
21.
GriesT., KraftM. and MeierrieksD., Linkages between financial deepening, trade openness, and economic development: Causality evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa, World Development37(12) (2009), 1849–1860.
22.
LatifZ., LeiW., PathanZ.H., HussainS. and KhanK., Factors Affecting Diffusion and Adoption of Information and Communication Technology Among Rural Users in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan, International Journal of Information Technology and Management20(1) (2018), 32–54.
23.
OmriA., CO 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: Evidence from simultaneous equations models, Energy economics40 (2013), 657–664.
24.
PradhanR.P., ArvinM., NairM., BennettS. and BahmaniS., ICT-finance-growth nexus: Empirical evidence from the Next-11 countries, Cuadernos de Economía (2016).
25.
FriedenR., Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States, Telecommunications Policy29(8) (2005), 595–613.
26.
ShinD.-H. and JungJ., Socio-technical analysis of Korea’s broadband convergence network: Big plans, big projects, big prospects?Telecommunications Policy36(7) (2012), 579–593.
27.
PuschitaE., et al., Challenges for a broadband service strategy in rural areas: A Romanian case study, Telecommunications Policy38(2) (2014), 147–156.
28.
PantL.P. and OdameH.H., Broadband for a sustainable digital future of rural communities: A reflexive interactive assessment, Journal of Rural Studies34(2) (2016).
29.
LaRoseR., et al., The impact of rural broadband development: Lessons from a natural field experiment, Government Information Quarterly28(1) (2011), 91–100.
30.
FarhadiM., IsmailR. and FooladiM., Information and communication technology use and economic growth, PLoS One7(11) (2012).
31.
LatifZ., Political Violence and FDI: A Case Study of Pakistan Telecom Sector. 2014: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
32.
SalifuA., The impact of internet crime on development, Journal of Financial Crime15(4) (2008), 432–443.
33.
Safar HasimM. and SalmanA., Factors affecting sustainability of internet usage among youth, The Electronic Library28(2) (2010), 300–313.
34.
OseniM.O. and PollittM.G., The prospects for smart energy prices: Observations from 50 years of residential pricing for fixed line telecoms and electricity, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews70 (2017), 150–160.
35.
LatifZ., et al., Challenges and prospects of ICT and trade development in Asia, Human Systems Management36(3) (2017), 211–219.
36.
AsonguS., The impact of mobile phone penetration on African inequality, International Journal of Social Economics42(8) (2015), 706–716.
37.
VelmuruganM.S., Sustainable perspectives on energy consumption, EMRF, environment, health and accident risks associated with the use of mobile phones, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews67 (2017), 192–206.
38.
AsonguS.A. and NwachukwuJ.C., The role of governance in mobile phones for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa, Technovation55-56 (2016), 1–13.
39.
LatifZ., et al., Application of optical frequency comb in high-capacity long distance optical communication for China-Pakistan economic corridor, in Journal of Optical Communications (2017).
