This article conveys the competitive priorities of manufacturing companies, with different strategic thrusts. Supported by the 2009 International Manufacturing Strategy Survey, the reported empirical research uses multivariate testing methods. The results show four competitive priorities, namely price, quality, delivery and service, which are important for European manufacturers to win orders. Besides, business enterprises’ different strategic thrusts influence their selection of competitive priorities, namely the ordering of quantity, flexibility, innovation, environmental protection and social responsibility. Dependent on European manufacturers’ strategic thrusts, crafted is a chart that depicts their competitive priorities. The chart shows the important differences among said manufacturers’ competitive priorities, according to their strategic thrusts. The article concludes with recommendations for manufacturing enterprises that intend to extend their business to Europe, depending on: parent-subsidiary relations and relationships, the competitive priorities of European competitors, and their own competitive priorities, transferred through their evolving strategic thrusts.
SeabrookeL. and TsingouE., Revolving doors and linked ecologies in the world economy: Policy locations and the practice of international financial reform;, 2009.
2.
ThiteM., WilkinsonA. and ShahD., Internationalization and HRM strategies across subsidiaries in multinational corporations from emerging economies—A conceptual framework, Journal of World Business47(2) (2012), 251–258.
3.
SchickA., Opportunity, strategy and tactics in reforming public management, Oecd Journal on Budgeting2(3) (2002), 14–14.
4.
MarchesiV.T. and AndrewsE.P., Glycoproteins: Isolation from cell membranes with lithium diiodosalicylate, Science174(4015) (1971), 1247–1248.
5.
CombsJ.G., KetchenD.K.Jr, Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictors from the resource-based view and organizational economics[J], Strategic Management Journal20(9) (1999), 867–888.
6.
NellP.C. and AmbosB., Parenting advantage in the mnc: An embeddedness perspective on the value added by headquarters, Strategic Management Journal34(9) (2013), 1086–1103.
MalnightT.W., The transition from decentralized to network-based mnc structures: An evolutionary perspective, Journal of International Business Studies27(1) (1996), 43–65.
9.
BirkinshawJ. and HoodN., Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies, Academy of Management Review23(4) (1998), 773–795.
10.
BirkinshawJ., HoodN. and YoungS., Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance, International Business Review14(2) (2005), 227–248.
11.
RabbiosiL. and SantangeloG.D., When in Rome, do as the Romans do: Subsidiary Autonomy as a Response to Corruption Distance, Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings2014(1), 13763–13761.
12.
RugmanA.M., VerbekeA. and NguyenQ.T., Fifty years of international business theory and beyond, Management International Review51(6) (2011), 755–786.
13.
NguyenQ.T.K., The regional strategies of British multinational subsidiaries in south East Asia, British Journal of Management25(Supplement) (2014), S60–S76.
14.
ParkB.I. and ChoiJ., Foreign direct investment motivations and knowledge acquisition from MNEs in overseas subsidiaries, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences31(2) (2014), 104–115.
15.
HayesR.H., Beyond world-class: The new manufacturing strategy, Harvard Business Review72(1) (1994), 77–86.
16.
ChenM.X., Interdependence in multinational production networks, Canadian Journal of Economics/revue Canadienne Déconomique44(3) (2011), 930–956.
17.
FlynnB.B., SchroederR.G. and SakakibaraS., A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument, Journal of Operations Management11(4) (1994), 339–366.
18.
WuX.B., DouW. and WuD., Chinese firm s indigenous innovation in global manufacturing networks: The modes, mechanisms and path, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management24(s1) (2010), 21–29.
19.
SteynB. and NiemannL., Strategic role of public relations in enterprise strategy, governance and sustainability— a normative framework, Public Relations Review40(2) (2014), 171–183.
20.
ZhaoJ.H., Strategic roles and evolution trend of subsidiary of transnational corporation in Chinese, China Industrial Economy (12) (2001), 61–66.
21.
KimK., RheeS. and OhJ., The strategic role evolution of foreign automotive parts subsidiaries in china, International Journal of Operations & Production Management31(1) (2011), 31–55.
22.
WhiteR.E. and PoynterT.A., Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada, Business Quarterly (2) (1984), 59–69.
23.
FerdowsK., Mapping international factory networks. Managing International Manufacturing. Elsevier Science Publishers; 1989, 3–21
.
24.
FerdowsK., Making the most of foreign factories, Harvard Business Review (1997), 73–88.
25.
BartlettC.A. and GhoshalS., Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Bookshop Harvard Business School Press; 1989.
26.
SlackN., ChambersS. and JohnstonR., Operations management, Beijing: Chinese Market Press63-67 (2007), 490–491.
27.
AlsmadiM., KhanZ. and McTavishA.M., Evaluating competitive advantage priorities of SMEs in Jordan, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations9(1) (2011), 25–43.
28.
KroesJ.R. and GhoshS., Outsourcing congruence with competitive priorities: Impact on supply chain and firm performance, Journal of Operations Management28(2) (2010), 124–143.
29.
CaiS. and YangZ., On the relationship between business environment and competitive priorities: The role of performance frontiers, International Journal of Production Economics151 (2014), 131–145.
30.
LongoniA. and CaglianoR., Environmental and social sustainability priorities: Their integration in operations strategies, International Journal of Operations & Production Management35(2) (2015), 216–245.
31.
IbrahimS.E., An alternative methodology for formulating an operations strategy: The case of BTC-Egypt, Management Decision48(6) (2010), 868–893.
32.
WardP.T., DurayR., LeongG.K. and SumC.C., Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers, Journal of operations management13(2) (1995), 99–115.
33.
RameshV. and KodaliR., A decision framework for maximizing lean manufacturing performance, International Journal of Production Research50(8) (2012), 2234–2251.
34.
PrajogoD.I. and McDermottP., Examining competitive priorities and competitive advantage in service organizations using Importance-Performance Analysis matrix, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal21(5) (2011), 465–483.
35.
KimW.C. and MauborgneR., Blue ocean strategy, Harvard Business Review82(10) (2005), 76–84, 156.
