Federated learning (FL) refers to a system in which a central aggregator coordinates the efforts of several clients to solve the issues of machine learning. This setting allows the training data to be dispersed in order to protect the privacy of each device. This paper provides an overview of federated learning systems, with a focus on healthcare. FL is reviewed in terms of its frameworks, architectures and applications. It is shown here that FL solves the preceding issues with a shared global deep learning (DL) model via a central aggregator server. Inspired by the rapid growth of FL research, this paper examines recent developments and provides a comprehensive list of unresolved issues. Several privacy methods including secure multiparty computation, homomorphic encryption, differential privacy and stochastic gradient descent are described in the context of FL. Moreover, a review is provided for different classes of FL such as horizontal and vertical FL and federated transfer learning. FL has applications in wireless communication, service recommendation, intelligent medical diagnosis system and healthcare, which we review in this paper. We also present a comprehensive review of existing FL challenges for example privacy protection, communication cost, systems heterogeneity, unreliable model upload, followed by future research directions.
ZhangC.HuX.XieY.GongM. and YuB., A privacy-preserving multi-task learning framework for face detection, landmark localization, pose estimation, and gender recognition, Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 2020, 112.
2.
GongM.FengJ. and XieY., Privacy-enhanced multi-party deep learning, Neural Networks121 (2020), 484–496.
BonawitzK. et al., Towards federated learning at scale: System design, Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems1 (2019), 374–388.
5.
AlbrechtJ.P., How the GDPR will change the world, Eur. Data Prot. L. Rev2 (2016), 287.
6.
ParasolM., The impact of China’s 2016 Cyber Security Law on foreign technology firms, and on China’s big data and Smart City dreams, Computer Law & Security Review34(1) (2018), 67–98.
7.
GrayW. and ZhengH.R., General principles of civil law of the people’s republic of China, The American Journal of Comparative Law34(4) (1986), 715–743.
8.
GongM.XieY.PanK.FengK. and QinA.K., A survey on differentially private machine learning, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine15(2) (2020), 49–64.
9.
ZhangC.XieY.BaiH.YuB.LiW. and GaoY., A survey on federated learning, Knowledge-Based Systems216 (2021), 106775.
10.
LiT.SahuA.K.TalwalkarA. and SmithV., Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine37(3) (2020), 50–60.
11.
XuJ.GlicksbergB.S.SuC.WalkerP.BianJ. and WangF., Federated learning for healthcare informatics, Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research5(1) (2021), 1–19.
12.
BonawitzK. et al., Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning, in: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2017, 2017.
13.
LiuY.KangY.XingC.ChenT. and YangQ., A secure federated transfer learning framework, IEEE Intelligent Systems35(4) (2020), 70–82.
14.
SmithV.ChiangC.-K.SanjabiM. and TalwalkarA.S., Federated multi-task learning, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems30 (2017).
15.
ZhaoY.LiM.LaiL.SudaN.CivinD. and ChandraV., Federated learning with non-iid data, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00582, 2018.
16.
GeyerR.C.KleinT. and NabiM., Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07557, 2017.
17.
LuoM. et al., Metaselector: Meta-learning for recommendation with user-level adaptive model selection, in: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020, 2020.
18.
LiL.FanY.TseM. and LinK.-Y., A review of applications in federated learning, Computers & Industrial Engineering149 (2020), 106854.
19.
MohasselP. and ZhangY., Secureml: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine learning, in: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), IEEE, 2017, pp. 19–38.
20.
KilbertusN.GascónA.KusnerM.VealeM.GummadiK. and WellerA., Blind justice: Fairness with encrypted sensitive attributes, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2018, pp. 2630–2639.
21.
BogdanovD.LaurS. and WillemsonJ., Sharemind: A framework for fast privacy-preserving computations, Springer, 2018, 192–206.
22.
MohasselP. and RindalP., ABY3: A mixed protocol framework for machine learning, in: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2018, pp. 35–52.
23.
ArakiT.FurukawaJ.LindellY.NofA. and OharaK., High-throughput semi-honest secure three-party computation with an honest majority, in: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2016, pp. 805–817.
24.
MohasselP.RosulekM. and ZhangY., Fast and secure three-party computation: The garbled circuit approach, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2015, pp. 591–602.
25.
RivestR.L.AdlemanL. and DertouzosM.L., On data banks and privacy homomorphisms, Foundations of Secure Computation4(11) (1978), 169–180.
26.
GiacomelliI.JhaS.JoyeM.PageC.D. and YoonK., Privacy-preserving ridge regression with only linearly-homomorphic encryption, in: International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security, Springer, 2018, pp. 243–261.
27.
HallR.FienbergS.E. and NardiY., Secure multiple linear regression based on homomorphic encryption, Journal of Official Statistics27(4) (2011), 669.
28.
NikolaenkoV.WeinsbergU.IoannidisS.JoyeM.BonehD. and TaftN., Privacy-preserving ridge regression on hundreds of millions of records, in: 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE, 2013, pp. 334–348.
29.
YuanJ. and YuS., Privacy preserving back-propagation neural network learning made practical with cloud computing, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems25(1) (2013), 212–221.
30.
ZhangQ.YangL.T. and ChenZ., Privacy preserving deep computation model on cloud for big data feature learning, IEEE Transactions on Computers65(5) (2015), 1351–1362.
31.
AcarA.AksuH.UluagacA.S. and ContiM., A survey on homomorphic encryption schemes: Theory and implementation, ACM Computing Surveys (Csur)51(4) (2018), 1–35.
32.
AonoY.HayashiT.Trieu PhongL. and WangL., Scalable and secure logistic regression via homomorphic encryption, in: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, 2016, pp. 142–144.
33.
KimM.SongY.WangS.XiaY. and JiangX., Secure logistic regression based on homomorphic encryption: Design and evaluation, JMIR Medical Informatics6(2) (2018), e8805.
34.
DworkC., Differential privacy: A survey of results, in: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, Springer, 2008, pp. 1–19.
35.
AonoY.HayashiT.WangL. and MoriaiS., Privacy-preserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security13(5) (2017), 1333–1345.
36.
BagdasaryanE.VeitA.HuaY.EstrinD. and ShmatikovV., How to backdoor federated learning, in: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, 2020, pp. 2938–2948.
37.
MelisL.SongC.De CristofaroE. and ShmatikovV., Inference attacks against collaborative learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04049, Vol. 13, 2018.
38.
SuL. and XuJ., Securing distributed machine learning in high dimensions, arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.10140, 2018, 1536–1233.
39.
KimH.ParkJ.BennisM. and KimS.-L., On-device federated learning via blockchain and its latency analysis, arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.03949, 2018.
40.
PanS.J. and YangQ., A survey on transfer learning, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering22(10) (2009), 1345–1359.
41.
WanL.NgW.K.HanS. and LeeV.C.S., Privacy-preservation for gradient descent methods, in: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2007, pp. 775–783.
42.
DuW.HanY.S. and ChenS., Privacy-preserving multivariate statistical analysis: Linear regression and classification, in: Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, SIAM, 2004, pp. 222–233.
43.
GascónA. et al., Secure linear regression on vertically partitioned datasets, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch2016 (2016), 892.
44.
KarrA.F.LinX.SanilA.P. and ReiterJ.P., Privacy-preserving analysis of vertically partitioned data using secure matrix products, Journal of Official Statistics25(1) (2009), 125.
45.
SanilA.P.KarrA.F.LinX. and ReiterJ.P., Privacy preserving regression modelling via distributed computation, in: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2004, pp. 677–682.
46.
VaidyaJ. and CliftonC., Privacy preserving association rule mining in vertically partitioned data, in: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2002, pp. 639–644.
47.
DuW. and AtallahM.J., Privacy-preserving cooperative statistical analysis, in: Seventeenth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, IEEE, 2001, pp. 102–110.
48.
HardyS. et al., Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryption, arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10677, 2017.
49.
NockR. et al., Entity resolution and federated learning get a federated resolution, arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04035, 2018.
50.
GoldreichO.MicaliS. and WigdersonA., How to play any mental game, or a completeness theorem for protocols with honest majority, in: Providing Sound Foundations for Cryptography: On the Work of Shafi Goldwasser and Silvio Micali, 2019, pp. 307–328.
51.
ShokriR. and ShmatikovV., Privacy-preserving deep learning, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2015, pp. 1310–1321.
52.
McMahanH.B.MooreE.RamageD. and y ArcasB.A., Federated learning of deep networks using model averaging, arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.05629, 2016.
53.
KonečnýJ.McMahanH.B.RamageD. and RichtárikP., Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence, arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527, 2016.
54.
LinY.HanS.MaoH.WangY. and DallyW.J., Deep gradient compression: Reducing the communication bandwidth for distributed training, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01887, 2017.
55.
MaX.MaJ.LiH.JiangQ. and GaoS., PDLM: Privacy-preserving deep learning model on cloud with multiple keys, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2018.
56.
HitajB.AtenieseG. and Perez-CruzF., Deep models under the GAN: information leakage from collaborative deep learning, in: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2017, pp. 603–618.
57.
YangQ.LiuY.ChenT. and TongY., Federated machine learning: Concept and applications, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST)10(2) (2019), 1–19.
58.
MaC. et al., On safeguarding privacy and security in the framework of federated learning, IEEE Network34(4) (2020), 242–248.
59.
NiknamS.DhillonH.S. and ReedJ.H., Federated learning for wireless communications: Motivation, opportunities, and challenges, IEEE Communications Magazine58(6) (2020), 46–51.
60.
AmiriM.M. and GündüzD., Federated learning over wireless fading channels, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications19(5) (2020), 3546–3557.
61.
TranH.-V.KaddoumG.ElgalaH.Abou-RjeilyC. and KaushalH., Lightwave power transfer for federated learning-based wireless networks, IEEE Communications Letters24(7) (2020), 1472–1476.
62.
AngF.ChenL.ZhaoN.ChenY.WangW. and YuF.R., Robust federated learning with noisy communication, IEEE Transactions on Communications68(6) (2020), 3452–3464.
63.
NguyenT.D.MarchalS.MiettinenM.DangM.H.AsokanN. and SadeghiA.R., A crowdsourced self-learning approach for detecting compromised IoT devices, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1804.07474, 2018.
64.
SavazziS.NicoliM. and RampaV., Federated learning with cooperating devices: A consensus approach for massive IoT networks, IEEE Internet of Things Journal7(5) (2020), 4641–4654.
65.
AbadM.S.H.OzfaturaE.GunduzD. and ErcetinO., Hierarchical federated learning across heterogeneous cellular networks, in: ICASSP 2020–2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2020, pp. 8866–8870.
66.
MansourY.MohriM.RoJ. and SureshA.T., Three approaches for personalization with applications to federated learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10619, 2020.
67.
RiekeN. et al., The future of digital health with federated learning, NPJ Digital Medicine3(1) (2020), 1–7.
68.
PriceW.N. and CohenI.G., Privacy in the age of medical big data, Nature Medicine25(1) (2019), 37–43.
69.
LeeJ.S.H. et al., From discovery to practice and survivorship: Building a national real-world data learning healthcare framework for military and veteran cancer patients, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics106(1) (2019), 52.
70.
BharatiS.PodderP.MondalM.R.H.PrasathV.B.S. and GandhiN., Ensemble Learning for Data-Driven Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, in: 21st International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2021), 2021.
71.
ZhangW. et al., Dynamic-fusion-based federated learning for COVID-19 detection, IEEE Internet of Things Journal8(21) (2021), 15884–15891.
72.
KumarR. et al., Blockchain-federated-learning and deep learning models for COVID-19 detection using ct imaging, IEEE Sensors Journal21(14) (2021), 16301–16314.
73.
PodderP.BharatiS.MondalM.R.H. and KoseU., Application of Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of COVID-19, in: Data Science for COVID-19, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 175–194.
74.
MondalM.R.H.BharatiS. and PodderP., CO-IRv2: Optimized InceptionResNetV2 for COVID-19 detection from chest CT images, PloS One16(10) (2021), e0259179.
75.
BharatiS.PodderP.MondalM.R.H. and PrasathV.B., CO-ResNet: Optimized ResNet model for COVID-19 diagnosis from X-ray images, International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems17 (2021), 71–85.
76.
MondalM.R.H.BharatiS.PodderP. and PodderP., Data analytics for novel coronavirus disease, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked20 (2020), 100374.
77.
MondalM.R.H.BharatiS. and PodderP., Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Review, Current Medical Imaging, 2021.
78.
PodderP.KhampariaA.MondalM.R.H.RahmanM.A. and BharatiS., Forecasting the Spread of COVID-19 and ICU Requirements, International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE)17(5) (2021).
79.
BharatiS.PodderP. and MondalM.R.H., Hybrid deep learning for detecting lung diseases from X-ray images, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (2020), 100391.
80.
BharatiS.PodderP.MondalM.R.H. and PrasathV.B., Medical Imaging with Deep Learning for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review, International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications13 (2021), 91–112.
81.
BharatiS.PodderP.MondalM.R.H. and GandhiN., Optimized NASNet for Diagnosis of COVID-19 from Lung CT Images, in: 20th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2020), 2020.
82.
BharatiS.PodderP.MondalM.R.H.PodderP. and KoseU., A review on epidemiology, genomic characteristics, spread, and treatments of COVID-19, in: Data Science for COVID-19, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 487–505.
83.
PaulP.K.BharatiS.PodderP. and MondalM.R.H., 10 The role of IoMT during pandemics Computational Intelligence for Managing Pandemics, in: KhampariaA.Hossain MondalR.PodderP.BhushanB.AlbuquerqueV.H.C.d. and KumarS., Eds.: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 169–186.
84.
BharatiS. and MondalM.R.H., 12 Applications and challenges of AI-driven IoHT for combating pandemics: a review Computational Intelligence for Managing Pandemics, in: KhampariaA.MondalM.R.H.PodderP.BhushanB.AlbuquerqueV.H.C.d. and KumarS., Eds.: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 213–230.
85.
SarmaK.V. et al., Federated learning improves site performance in multicenter deep learning without data sharing, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association28(6) (2021), 1259–1264.
86.
BharatiS. and PodderP., 1 Performance of CNN for predicting cancerous lung nodules using LightGBM, in: Artificial Intelligence for Data-Driven Medical Diagnosis, De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 1–18.
87.
PodderP.BharatiS. and MondalM.R.H., 10 Automated gastric cancer detection and classification using machine learning, in: Artificial Intelligence for Data-Driven Medical Diagnosis, De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 207–224.
88.
BharatiS.PodderP. and MondalM.R.H., Artificial neural network based breast cancer screening: A comprehensive review, International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications12 (2020), 125–137.
89.
BharatiS.RahmanM.A. and PodderP., Breast cancer prediction applying different classification algorithm with comparative analysis using WEKA, in: 2018 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information & Communication Technology (iCEEiCT), Dhaka, Bangladesh, IEEE, 2018, pp. 581–584.
90.
BharatiS.PodderP.MondalR.MahmoodA. and Raihan-Al-MasudM., Comparative performance analysis of different classification algorithm for the purpose of prediction of lung cancer, in: International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Springer, Vol. 941, 2018, pp. 447–457.
91.
KhampariaA. et al., Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Based on Modern Mammography using Hybrid Transfer Learning, Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing32 (2021), 747-765.
92.
BharatiS., How artificial intelligence impacts businesses in the period of pandemics, Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies Editorials 26(5) (2020).
93.
BharatiS.PodderP. and PaulP.K., Lung cancer recognition and prediction according to random forest ensemble and RUSBoost algorithm using LIDC data, International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems15(2) (2019), 91–100.
94.
PodderP.BharatiS.RahmanM.A. and KoseU., Transfer Learning for Classification of Brain Tumor, in: Deep Learning for Biomedical Applications, CRC Press, 2021, pp. 315–328.
95.
AledhariM.RazzakR.PariziR.M. and SaeedF., Federated learning: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications, IEEE Access8 (2020), 140699–140725.
96.
BharatiS.PodderP. and Raihan-Al-MasudM., EEG Eye State Prediction and Classification in order to Investigate Human Cognitive State, in: 2018 International Conference on Advancement in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICAEEE), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–4.
97.
Sadiq IqbalM.AkhtarN.Shahariar ParvezA.H.M.BharatiS. and PodderP., Ensemble learning-based EEG feature vector analysis for brain computer interface, in: Evolutionary Computing and Mobile Sustainable Networks, Springer, 2021, pp. 957–969.
98.
ElayanH.AloqailyM. and GuizaniM., Sustainability of healthcare data analysis IoT-based systems using deep federated learning, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2021.
99.
XiaoZ.XuX.XingH.SongF.WangX. and ZhaoB., A federated learning system with enhanced feature extraction for human activity recognition, Knowledge-Based Systems229 (2021), 107338.
100.
ChhikaraP.SinghP.TekchandaniR.KumarN. and GuizaniM., Federated learning meets human emotions: A decentralized framework for human-computer interaction for IoT applications, IEEE Internet of Things Journal8(8) (2020), 6949–6962.
101.
VaidA. et al., Federated learning of electronic health records to improve mortality prediction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: Machine learning approach, JMIR Medical Informatics9(1) (2021), e24207.
102.
BrisimiT.S.ChenR.MelaT.OlshevskyA.PaschalidisI.C. and ShiW., Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records, International Journal of Medical Informatics112 (2018), 59–67.
103.
GlicksbergB.S.JohnsonK.W. and DudleyJ.T., The next generation of precision medicine: Observational studies, electronic health records, biobanks and continuous monitoring, Human Molecular Genetics27(R1) (2018), R56–R62.
104.
JensenP.B.JensenL.J. and BrunakS., Mining electronic health records: Towards better research applications and clinical care, Nature Reviews Genetics13(6) (2012), 395–405.
105.
MiottoR.WangF.WangS.JiangX. and DudleyJ.T., Deep learning for healthcare: Review, opportunities and challenges, Briefings in Bioinformatics19(6) (2018), 1236–1246.
106.
ObermeyerZ.PowersB.VogeliC. and MullainathanS., Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations, Science366(6464) (2019), 447–453.
107.
HripcsakG. et al., Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for observational researchers, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics216 (2015), 574.
108.
YangD. et al., Federated semi-supervised learning for COVID region segmentation in chest CT using multi-national data from China, Italy, Japan, Medical Image Analysis70 (2021), 101992.
109.
DuanR. et al., Learning from electronic health records across multiple sites: A communication-efficient and privacy-preserving distributed algorithm, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association27(3) (2020), 376–385.
110.
BegumA.M.MondalM.R.H.PodderP. and BharatiS., Detecting Spinal Abnormalities using Multilayer Perceptron Algorithm, in: 11th World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, 2021.
111.
HuangL.SheaA.L.QianH.MasurkarA.DengH. and LiuD., Patient clustering improves efficiency of federated machine learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed electronic medical records, Journal of Biomedical Informatics99 (2019), 103291.
112.
LiZ.RobertsK.JiangX. and LongQ., Distributed learning from multiple EHR databases: Contextual embedding models for medical events, Journal of Biomedical Informatics92 (2019), 103138.
113.
RajaP.V. and SivasankarE., Modern framework for distributed healthcare data analytics based on Hadoop, in: Information and Communication Technology-EurAsia Conference, Springer, 2014, pp. 348–355.
114.
KimY.SunJ.YuH. and JiangX., Federated tensor factorization for computational phenotyping, in: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2017, pp. 887–895.
115.
LeeJ.SunJ.WangF.WangS.JunC.-H. and JiangX., Privacy-preserving patient similarity learning in a federated environment: Development and analysis, JMIR Medical Informatics6(2) (2018), e7744.
116.
LiuD.DligachD. and MillerT., Two-stage federated phenotyping and patient representation learning, in: Proceedings of the Conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting, NIH Public Access, Vol. 2019, 2019, p. 283.
117.
GuptaO. and RaskarR., Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agents, Journal of Network and Computer Applications116 (2018), 1–8.
118.
VepakommaP.GuptaO.SwedishT. and RaskarR., Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient data, arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00564, 2018.
119.
SilvaS.GutmanB.A.RomeroE.ThompsonP.M.AltmannA. and LorenziM., Federated learning in distributed medical databases: Meta-analysis of large-scale subcortical brain data, IEEE, 270–274.
120.
BoughorbelS.JarrayF.VenugopalN.MoosaS.ElhadiH. and MakhloufM., Federated uncertainty-aware learning for distributed hospital ehr data, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12191, 2019.
121.
SharmaP.ShamoutF.E. and CliftonD.A., Preserving patient privacy while training a predictive model of in-hospital mortality, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.00354, 2019.
122.
AbdulRahmanS.ToutH.Ould-SlimaneH.MouradA.TalhiC. and GuizaniM., A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond, IEEE Internet of Things Journal8(7) (2020), 5476–5497.
123.
PfohlS.R.DaiA.M. and HellerK., Federated and differentially private learning for electronic health records, arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.05861, 2019.
124.
ChenY.QinX.WangJ.YuC. and GaoW., Fedhealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare, IEEE Intelligent Systems35(4) (2020), 83–93.
125.
YuanB.GeS. and XingW., A federated learning framework for healthcare iot devices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05083, 2020.
126.
VaidA. et al., Federated learning of electronic health records improves mortality prediction in patients hospitalized with covid-19, medRxiv, 2020.
127.
McMahanH.B.RamageD.TalwarK. and ZhangL., Learning differentially private recurrent language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06963, 2017.
128.
Van BerkelC.H., Multi-core for mobile phones, in: 2009 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1260–1265.
129.
KangJ.XiongZ.NiyatoD.ZouY.ZhangY. and GuizaniM., Reliable federated learning for mobile networks, IEEE Wireless Communications27(2) (2020), 72–80.
130.
LiJ.KhodakM.CaldasS. and TalwalkarA., Differentially private meta-learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05830, 2019.
131.
LiT.SanjabiM.BeiramiA. and SmithV., Fair resource allocation in federated learning, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1905.10497, 2019.
132.
LaguelY.PillutlaK.MalickJ. and HarchaouiZ., Device heterogeneity in federated learning: A superquantile approach, arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11223, 2020.
133.
DinhC.T.TranN. and NguyenJ., Personalized federated learning with moreau envelopes, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems33 (2020), 21394–21405.
134.
MohriM.SivekG. and SureshA.T., Agnostic federated learning, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2019, pp. 4615–4625.
135.
AwasthiP.CortesC.MansourY. and MohriM., Beyond individual and group fairness, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2008.09490, 2020.
136.
HardtM.PriceE. and SrebroN., Equality of opportunity in supervised learning, Advances in neural Information Processing Systems29 (2016).
137.
HashimotoT.SrivastavaM.NamkoongH. and LiangP., Fairness without demographics in repeated loss minimization, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2018, pp. 1929–1938.
138.
ZafarM.B.ValeraI.RogriguezM.G. and GummadiK.P., Fairness constraints: Mechanisms for fair classification, in: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, 2017, pp. 962–970.
139.
YaoY.RosascoL. and CaponnettoA., On early stopping in gradient descent learning, Constructive Approximation26(2) (2007), 289–315.
140.
MackeyL.JordanM. and TalwalkarA., Divide-and-conquer matrix factorization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems24 (2011).
141.
BolukbasiT.WangJ.DekelO. and SaligramaV., Adaptive neural networks for efficient inference, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2017, pp. 527–536.
142.
YinD.PananjadyA.LamM.PapailiopoulosD.RamchandranK. and BartlettP., Gradient diversity: a key ingredient for scalable distributed learning, in: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, 2018, pp. 1998–2007.
143.
AgarwalN.SureshA.T.YuF.X.X.KumarS. and McMahanB., cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGD, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems31 (2018).
144.
EichnerH.KorenT.McMahanB.SrebroN. and TalwarK., Semi-cyclic stochastic gradient descent, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2019, pp. 1764–1773.
145.
BonawitzK.EichnerH. and GrieskampW., TensorFlow federated: machine learning on decentralized data, 2020.
146.
CaldasS. et al., Leaf: A benchmark for federated settings, arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01097, 2018.
147.
BharatiS.PodderP.MondalM.R.H. and RobelM.R.A., Threats and countermeasures of cyber security in direct and remote vehicle communication systems, Journal of Information Assurance and Security15(4) (2020), 153–164.
148.
BharatiS.PodderP.ThanhD.N.H. and PrasathV.B.S., Dementia classification using MR imaging and voting based machine learning models, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-12754-x.
149.
BharatiS. and PodderP., Adaptive PAPR reduction scheme for OFDM using SLM with the fusion of proposed clipping and filtering technique in order to diminish PAPR and signal distortion, Wireless Personal Communications113(4) (2020), 2271–2288.
150.
PodderP.BharatiS.MondalM.R.H.PaulP.K. and KoseU., Artificial neural network for cybersecurity: A comprehensive review, Journal of Information Assurance and Security16(1) (2021), 010–023.
151.
BharatiS.PodderP. and MondalM.R.H., Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome using machine learning algorithms, in: 2020 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1486–1489.
