Cloud computing is the ubiquitous on demand service that has brought remarkable revolution in the commercialization of High Performance Computing (HPC) [1]. Quality of Service (QoS) is the vital factor that always seeks high attention. Efficient Resource allocation and management techniques along with advance load balancing approaches make a bigger difference in terms of total system throughput. Several frameworks and algorithmic approaches are proposed in these areas to improve the throughput. Cloudlets are the tasks formed as the requirements of cloud users and submitted to the Local Queues (LQ) of Virtual Machines (VM) by the Datacenter Broker (DCB) to be processed. In this paper the main focus is given to this cloudlet scheduling policy which is nothing but an enhancement of the existing Improved Round Robin Cloudlet Scheduling Algorithm (IRRCSA) and Round Robin Algorithm (RRA). CloudSim 3.0.3 is used to implant the modelling and several parameters like Context Switching (CS), waiting Time (WT), Turnaround Time (TAT) are taken into account to highlight the QoS improvement in comparison with the IRRCSA and RRA approaches.
YoungeA.J.HenschelR.BrownJ.T.LaszewskiG.V.QiuJ. and FoxG.C., Analysis of virtualization technologies for high performance computing environments, in: Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2011 IEEE International Conference, 2011, pp. 9–16.
2.
OughC.J., in: Toward Better Understanding of Service Level Agreement (SLA) Expectations for Improved Conformance among Stakeholders in a Distributed, Dynamic, Composite Software Solution, Capstone Report, University Of Oregon, 2008, pp. 1–80.
3.
CalheirosR.N.RanjanR. and BuyyaR., Virtual machine provisioning based on analytical performance and QoS in cloud computing environments, in: 2011 International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP), 2011, pp. 295–304.
4.
BanerjeeS.AdhikariM. and BiswasU., Design and analysis of an efficient QoS improvement policy in cloud computing, Service Oriented Computing and Applications, Springer 11(1) (2017), 65–73.
5.
WeinhardtC.AnandasivamA.BlauB.BorissovN.MeinlT.MichalkW. and StößerJ., Cloud computing – a classification, business models, and research directions, Business & Information Systems Engineering1(5) (2009), 391–399.
6.
LiuF.TongJ.MaoJ.BohnR.MessinaJ.BadgerL. and LeafD., NIST cloud computing reference architecture, NIST Special Publication (2011), 1–28.
7.
VoorsluysW.BrobergJ. and BuyyaR., Introduction to Cloud Computing, Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms (2011), 1–41.
8.
CalheirosR.N.RanjanR.BeloglazovA.De RoseC.A. and BuyyaR., CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms, Software: Practice and Experience41(1) (2011), 23–50.
9.
BuyyaR. and MurshedM., Gridsim: A toolkit for the modeling and simulation of distributed resource management and scheduling for grid computing, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience14 (2002), 13–15.
10.
SimK.M., Grid resource negotiation: Survey and new directions, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics40(3) (2010), 245–257.
11.
SimK.M., A survey of bargaining models for grid resource allocation, ACM SIGecom Exchanges5(5) (2006), 22–32.
12.
CasanovaH., Simgrid: A toolkit for the simulation of application scheduling, Proceedings First IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (2001), 430–437.
13.
MurshedM.BuyyaR. and AbramsonD., Gridsim: A toolkit for the modeling and simulation of global grids, Monash University Journal (2001), 1–5.
14.
DumitrescuC.L. and FosterI., GangSim: a simulator for grid scheduling studies, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid2 (2005), 1151–1158.
15.
LasseterR.H. and PaigiP., Microgrid: A conceptual solution, in: 2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551), 6, 2004, pp. 4285–4290.
16.
DobreC., A General Framework for the Modeling and Simulation of Grid and P2P Systems, Handbook of Research on P2P and Grid Systems for Service-Oriented Computing: Models, Methodologies and Applications, IGI Global (2010), 657–685.
17.
MalhotraR. and JainP., Study and comparison of various cloud simulators available in the cloud computing, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering3(9) (2013), 347–350.
18.
BuyyaR.RanjanR. and CalheirosR.N., Modeling and simulation of scalable Cloud computing environments and the CloudSim toolkit: Challenges and opportunities, in: 2009 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation, 2009, pp. 1–11.
19.
CalheirosR.N.RanjanR.De RoseC.A. and BuyyaR., Cloudsim: A novel framework for modeling and simulation of cloud computing infrastructures and services, arXiv e-print arXiv:0903.2525, 2009, 1–9.
20.
BuyyaR. and MurshedM., GridSim: A Toolkit for the Modeling and Simulation of Distributed Resource Management and Scheduling for Grid Computing, arXiv:cs/0203019, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Wiley, 2002, 1–37.
21.
WickremasingheB. and BuyyaR., Cloudanalyst: A cloudsim-based tool for modelling and analysis of large scale cloud computing environments, MEDC Project Report (2009), 433–659.
22.
WickremasingheB.CalheirosR.N. and BuyyaR., Cloudanalyst: A cloudsim-based visual modeller for analysing cloud computing environments and applications, in: 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2010, pp. 446–452.
23.
ChatterjeeT.OjhaV.K.AdhikariM.BanerjeeS.BiswasU. and SnášelV., Design and Implementation of an Improved Datacenter Broker Policy to Improve the QoS of a Cloud, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications IBICA 2014, AISC 303, Springer, 2014, pp. 281–290.
24.
BanerjeeS.AdhikariM.KarS. and BiswasU., Development and analysis of a new cloudlet allocation strategy for QoS improvement in cloud, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering40(5) (2015), 1409–1425.
25.
AdhikariM.BanerjeeS. and BiswasU., Smart task assignment model for cloud service provider, in: Special Issue of International Journal of Computer Applications (0975–8887) on Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies for HPC Applications – ACCTHPCA, 2012, 43–46.
26.
BanerjeeS.AdhikariM. and BiswasU., Development of a smart cloudlet allocation model for a cloud service provider, in: 2nd International Conference on Business and Information Management (ICBIM), 2014, pp. 114–119.
27.
AhmedA. and SabyasachiA.S., Cloud computing simulators: A detailed survey and future direction, in: IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 2014, pp. 866–872.
28.
WangL.LanY. and XiaQ., Using cloudsim to model and simulate cloud computing environment, in: 2013 Ninth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, 2013, pp. 323–328.
29.
WeiY. and BlakeM.B., Service-oriented computing and cloud computing: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE Internet Computing14(6) (2010), 72–75.
30.
SindhuS. and MukherjeeS., Efficient task scheduling algorithms for cloud computing environment, in: MantriA., eds, High Performance Architecture and Grid Computing, CCIS 169, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 79–83.
31.
RuJ. and KeungJ., An empirical investigation on the simulation of priority and shortest-job-first scheduling for cloud-based software systems, in: 2013 22nd Australian Software Engineering Conference, 2013, pp. 78–87.
32.
ThombareM.SukhwaniR.ShahP.ChaudhariS. and RaundaleP., Efficient implementation of Multilevel Feedback Queue Scheduling, in: 2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), 2016, pp. 1950–1954.
