The article examines the global university reputation race, launched in 2003. Between 2003 and 2010, there appeared a cluster of publications on the qualitative comparative analysis of their methodologies, and since 2010, a cluster of publications on the quantitative comparative analysis of university rankings has started to form. The review made it possible to identify a number of unsolved problems concerning the stability of university rankings, aggregation of the number of universities and their Overall Scores (Total Scores) by country in various rankings. Our study aimed at solving these tasks was carried out for TOP-100s of ARWU, QS, and THE rankings. When calculating the fluctuation range of the university rankings, the top twenty of the most stable and most unstable university rankings were identified in the rankings under study. The best values of the aggregated indicators by the number of universities and the Overall Scores were identified for the USA and the UK.
Bar-IlanJ.Mat-HassanM., & LeveneM. (2006). Methods for comparing of search engine results. Computer Network, 50(10), 1448-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2005.10.020.
3.
Bar-IlanJ.LeveneM., & LinA. (2007). Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informatics, 1(1), 26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2006.08.001.
4.
Cebolla-BoadoH.HuY., & SoysalY.N. (2018). Why study abroad? Sorting of Chinese students across British universities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(3), 365-380. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2017.1349649.
5.
ChenK., & LiaoP. (2012). A comparative study on world university rankings: A bibliometric survey. Scientometrics, 92(1), 89-103. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0724-7.
6.
ClarkeM. (2007). The impact of higher education rankings on student access, choice, and opportunity. Higher Education in Europe, 32(1), 59-70. doi: 10.1080/03797720701618880.
7.
De WitteK., & HudrlikovaL. (2013). What about excellence in teaching. A benevolent ranking of universities. Scientometrics, 96, 337-364. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0971-2.
8.
EhrenbergG. (2000). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University-Press. Book Review in the International Journal of Educational Advancement, 9, 54-56. doi: 10.1057/ijea.2009.20.
9.
FaginR.KumarR., & SivakumarD. (2003). Comparing top k lists. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 17(1), 134-160.
10.
FrankR.H., & CookP.J. (1995). The winner-take-all society: How more and more Americans compete for ever fewer and bigger prizes, encouraging economic waste and income inequality and an improved cultural life. New York; Free Press.
11.
HarveyL. (2008). Assaying improvement, paper presented at the 30 EAIR Forum, Copenhagen, Denmark, 24–27 August.
12.
HazelkornE. (2007). The impact of the league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision making. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), 81-105. doi: 10.1787/hemp-v19-art12-en.
13.
HazelkornE. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 193-215. doi: 10.1057/hep.2008.1.
14.
HazelkornE. (2015). Globalization and the Reputation Race. In: Rankings and Reshaping of Higher Education. The Battle for World-Class Excellence. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-25.
15.
HouY.O.MorseR., & JiangZ.L. (2011). Analyzing the movement of ranking order in world universities’ rankings: How to understand and use universities rankings effectively to draw up a universities’ development strategy. Evaluation Bimonthly, 30, 43-49.
16.
HouY.O.MorseR., & JiangZ.L. (2012). An analysis of mobility in global rankings: Making institutional strategic plans and positioning for building world-class universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 841-857. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.662631.
17.
HuangM.X. (2011). The comparison of performance of scientific papers for world universities and other ranking systems. Evaluation Bimonthly, 29, 53-59.
18.
KhosrowjerdiM., & Seif KashaniZ. (2013). Asian top universities in six world university ranking systems. Webology, 10(2), 1-9.
19.
MarginsonS. (1997). Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987–1997. Australian Universities’ Review, 40(1), 5-14. doi: 10.3316/ielapa.980404115.
20.
MarginsonS. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 131-142. doi: 10.1080/13600800701351660.
21.
MoedH.F. (2017). A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings. Scientometrics, 110(2), 967-990. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2212-y.
22.
MoskovkinV.M.PupyninaE.V.ZaitsevaN.P., & LesovikR.V. (2013). Methodology for comparative analysis of university rankings, with the mediterranean and black sea region countries. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 18(11), 1656-1665.
23.
MoskovkinV.M.GolikovN.A.PeresypkinA.P., & SerkinaO.V. (2015). Aggregated raking of the World’s leading universities. Webology, 12(1).
24.
MoskovkinV.M., & SerkinaO.V. (2016a). Is sustainable development of scientific systems possible in the neo-liberal agenda? Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 16, 1-9. doi: 10.3354/esep00165.
25.
MoskovkinV.M., & SerkinaO.V. (2016b). What is the cost of bibliometric games to taxpayers? Webology, 13(2), Article 148.
26.
MussardM., & JamesA.P. (2018). Engineering the global university rankings: Gold standards, limitations and implications. IEEE Access, 6, 6765-6776.
27.
NethalK.J., & HarrisonJ. (2014). World university ranking systems: An alternative approach using partial least squares path modelling. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(5), 471-482. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2014.936090.
28.
OlcayG.A., & BuluM. (2017). Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible? A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.029.
29.
PavelA.-P. (2015). Global university rankings – a comparative analytics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 54-63.
30.
PinarM.MillaJ., & StengosT. (2018). Sensitivity of university rankings: Implications of stochastic dominance efficiency analysis. Education Economics, 27(1), 75-92. doi: 10.1080/09645292.2018.1512560.
31.
SaisanaM.D’HombresB., & SaltelliA. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165-177. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003.
32.
SalmiJ. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. The World Bank, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7865-6.
SeltenF.NeylonC.HuangC.-K., & GrothP. (2020). A longitudinal analysis of university rankings. The MIT Press Journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1109-1135. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00052.
35.
ShehattaI., & MahmoodK. (2016). Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: Policy implications. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1231-1254. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2065-4.
36.
SohK.C. (2012). Simpson’s Paradox and confounding factors in university rankings: A demonstration using QS 2011–2012 data. European Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 389-402. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2012.743223.
37.
SohK.C. (2013a). Misleading university rankings: Cause and cure for discrepancies between nominal and attained weights. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(2), 206-214. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.775929.
38.
SohK.C. (2013b). Rectifying on honest error in world university rankings: A solution to the problem of indicator weight discrepancies. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(6), 574-585. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.844670.
39.
SohK.C. (2017). The seven deadly sins of world university ranking: A summary from several papers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 104-115. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2016.1254431.
40.
TofallisC. (2012). A different approach to university rankings. Higher Education, 63(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9417-z.
41.
VidalP., & FilliatreanG. (2014). Graphical comparison of World University Rankings. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 8(1), 1-14. doi: 10.6197/HEED.2014.0801.01.
