This study is aimed at describing and analyzing WeChat services at the libraries of the top 50 universities in China. It first describes the services offered by WeChat and then provides an analysis of the WeChat services through three pathways – menu service, real-time reference, and message sending – and provides suggestions for improvement, meaning that library services can be better and more conveniently accessed via WeChat. This paper may be helpful to librarians interested in WeChat as a library service tool.
WeChat 2016. Available from: http://baike.baidu.com/subview/5117297/15145056.htm.
2.
WeChat public platform 2014. Available from: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/cgi-bin/loginpage?t=wxm2-login&lang=zh_CN.
3.
LiuXN. Tencent and playing WeChat, 2012. Available from: http://it.sohu.com/20121216/n360562609.shtml.
4.
ChenYS. Thinking on the construction of WeChat Library. Information Studies: Theory & Application. 2014; 37(7): 86-89.
5.
CountsSFisherKE. Mobile social networking as information ground: A case study. Library & Information Science Research. 2010 Apr 30; 32(2): 98-115.
6.
LinhNC. A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries. Library Hi Tech. 2008 Nov 21; 26(4): 630-53.
7.
KimYMAbbasJ. Adoption of Library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: a knowledge management perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2010 May 31; 36(3): 211-8.
8.
JahanIAhmedSZ. Students’ perceptions of academic use of social networking sites: a survey of university students in Bangladesh. Information Development. 2012 Aug; 28(3): 235-47.
9.
LiuS. Engaging users: the future of academic library web sites. College & Research Libraries. 2008 Jan 1; 69(1): 6-27.
10.
HarinarayanaNSVasantha RajuN. Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. The Electronic Library. 2010 Feb 16; 28(1): 69-88.
11.
ArifMMahmoodK. The changing role of librarians in the digital world: adoption of Web 2.0 technologies by Pakistani librarians. The Electronic Library. 2012 Aug 3; 30(4): 469-79.
12.
ChuSKDuHS. Social networking tools for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2013 Mar; 45(1): 64-75.
13.
AyuARAbrizahA. Do you Facebook? Usage and applications of Facebook page among academic libraries in Malaysia. The International Information & Library Review. 2011 Dec 31; 43(4): 239-49.
14.
ChuaAYGohDH. A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research. 2010 Jul 31; 32(3): 203-11.
15.
MansorYIdrisSR. Perceptions, awareness and acceptance of library 2.0 applications among librarians at the International Islamic University Malaysia. Webology. 2010; 7(2): a81.
16.
KrabillB. Tweeting in the stacks: why public libraries should embrace Twitter. Florida Libraries. 2009; 52(2): 14-5.
17.
BosqueDLeifSASkarlS. Libraries atwitter: Trends in academic library tweeting. Reference Services Review. 2012 May 11; 40(2): 199-213.
18.
FrenchPYesteE. Social media as a tool to disseminate library contents. Case study of the JFK Library Twitter account. Investigation Bibliotecologica. 2017; 31(72): 21-37.
19.
Al-DaihaniSMAlAwadhiSA. Exploring academic libraries’ use of Twitter: a content analysis. ELECTRONIC LIBRARY. 2015; 33(6): 1002-1015.
20.
GrgicIH. Croatian school libraries on Facebook: meeting the needs of young library users. New Library World. 2013 Sep 30; 114(9/10): 416-27.
21.
VassilakakiEGaroufallouE. Library Facebook practices for creating and promoting a professional profile. Program. 2015 Jul 6; 49(3): 343-59.
AharonyN. Facebook use in libraries: an exploratory analysis. In Aslib Proceedings. 2012 Jun 29; 64(4): 358-372. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
24.
YangSQDalalHA. Delivering virtual reference services on the web: An investigation into the current practice by academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2015 Jan 31; 41(1): 68-86.
25.
VaughanLGaoY. The use of microblogs and social networking services: A comparison between academic libraries of the United States and China. Journal of Web Librarianship. 2016 Jan 2; 10(1): 1-3.
26.
TellaAOyedokunTT. An evaluation of online reference services through social networking sites in selected Nigerian university libraries. The Reference Librarian. 2014 Oct 2; 55(4): 343-67.
27.
WangYJ. Implications to university libraries from the successful influence marketing of Xiaonei-Renren network. Library and Information Service. 2011; 55(3): 93-6.
28.
SawGAbbottWDonagheyJMcDonaldC. Social media for international students-it’s not all about Facebook. Library Management. 2013 Feb 22; 34(3): 156-74.
29.
WeiQYangY. WeChat Library: a new mode of mobile library service. The Electronic Library. 2017 Feb 6; 35(1): 198-208.
30.
ZhuQ. The application of social media in outreach of academic libraries’ resources and services: A case study on WeChat. Library Hi Tech. 2016 Nov 21; 34(4): 615-24.
31.
ChenCPingcangXHongLTaoY. WeChat Application for Library Near-field Services: Case Study of Beijing Administrative College Library. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery. 2016 Apr 12; 32(3): 97-102.
32.
ZhouQ. Application Status and Suggestions of WeChat Public Platform to University Libraries in Shaanxi Province. Research on Library Science. 2015; 38(7): 41-44, DOI: 10.15941/j.cnki.issn1001-0424.2015.07.008.
33.
GuoJ. A survey of application status of WeChat in libraries of “Project 985” universities in China. Research on Library Science. 2015; 34(4): 71-76.
34.
MaDYLiXJChenHJ. The WeChat service status and development strategies of a university library – based on survey of ‘project 985’ university libraries. Library Work and Study. 2015; 37(3): 33-37.
35.
XuJKangQSongZClarkeCP. Applications of mobile social media: WeChat among academic libraries in China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2015 Jan 31; 41(1): 21-30.
36.
WuSL. Chinese university league table. Version 2016. Available from: http://learning.sohu.com/20160408/n443636205.shtml.
37.
Feixin. WeChat user data report: has covered more than 90% of China’s smart phone, 2015. Available from: http://www.cctime.com/html/2015-6-1/2015611334271041.htm.
38.
PunR. WeChat in the library: promoting a new virtual reference service using a mobile app. Library Hi Tech News. 2015 Aug 3; 32(6): 9-11.
39.
Tencent. About Tencent. Available from: https://www.tencent.com/en-us/abouttencent.html.
40.
WilkinsonC. Mobile platforms: getting information on the go. Digital and information literacy (Vol. 1st, p. 48). New York: Rosen Pub. 2011.
41.
ChowASCroxtonRA. A usability evaluation of academic virtual reference services. College & Research Libraries. 2014 May 1; 75(3): 309-61.
42.
GanCZhengJ. Investigation on WeChat Public Platform of Public Libraries in China. Journal of Modern Information. 2016; 36(1): 74-79, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2016.01.013.
43.
GanC. A survey of WeChat application in Chinese public libraries. Library Hi Tech. 2016 Nov 21; 34(4): 625-38.
44.
KatzLS. Digital reference services. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2013 Oct 31.
45.
TrottBSchwartzHR. The application of RUSA standards to the virtual reference interview. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 2014 Sep 25; 54(1): 8-11.
