This work analyses the structure of LIS program mission statements. The programs considered here are all ALA (American Library Association) accredited programs in the United States and Canada. The study employed content analysis through constant comparative analysis to determine the structure of the mission statements, the stakeholders represented in these as well as and the needs the programs satisfy for the different stakeholders. The results point to LIS programs employing symbolic mission statements that do not help to differentiate one program from another. The stakeholders represented were mainly students and external groups, both in interactions with one another.
ScottJC. The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education.2006 Jan 1; 77(1): 1-39.
2.
OguzFChuCMChowAS. Studying online: Student motivations and experiences in ALA-Accredited LIS Programs. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science.2015 Jul 1; 56(3): 213.
3.
StacyRN. Stakeholder theory. In: Salem Press Encyclopedia (Online); 2013.
4.
FreemanRE. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984.
5.
CraneARuebottomT. Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics.2011 Mar 1; 102(1): 77-87.
6.
MitchellRKAgleBRWoodDJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review.1997 Oct 1; 22(4): 853-86.
7.
JongbloedBEndersJSalernoC. Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education.2008 Sep 1; 56(3): 303-24.
8.
DavidFR. Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Peaeson/Prentice Hall; 2001.
9.
DruckerP. Managing the Nonprofit Organization. New York; Harper Collins; 1990.
10.
PalmerTBShortJC. Mission statements in US colleges of business: An empirical examination of their content with linkages to configurations and performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education.2008 Dec 1; 7(4): 454-70.
11.
Commission on Institutions of Higher Learning. New England Association of Schools and Colleges. 1 July 2016. New Standards for Accreditation. (Accessed: 31 August 2016) Available [https//cihe.neasc.org/sites/cihe.neasc.org/files/downloads/2016_Standards_for_Accreditation.pdf].
12.
American Library Association. Accreditation Process, Policies and Procedures (AP3). January 2008. Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies (Accessed: 8 August 2016). Available [http//www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/files/standards/standards_2008.pdf].
13.
DavidMEDavidFRDavidFR. Mission statement theory and practice: a content analysis and new direction. International Journal of Business, Marketing, & Decision Science.2014 Jun 1; 7(1).
14.
MorphewCCHartleyM. Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education.2006 May 1; 77(3): 456-71.
15.
KosmützkyAKrückenG. Sameness and difference: Analyzing institutional and organizational specificities of universities through mission statements. International Studies of Management & Organization.2015 Apr 3; 45(2): 137-49.
16.
TaylorBJMorphewCC. An analysis of baccalaureate college mission statements. Research in Higher Education.2010 Aug 1; 51(5): 483-503.
17.
BartCK. Sex, lies, and mission statements. Business Horizons.1997 Dec 31; 40(6): 9-18.
18.
BartkusBRGlassmanM. Do firms practice what they preach? The relationship between mission statements and stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics.2008 Dec 1; 83(2): 207-16.
19.
CookKSHardinRLeviM. Cooperation without Law or Trust [2005]. Contemporary Sociological Theory.2007 Apr 2: 125.
20.
WilsonPA. Building social capital: A learning agenda for the twenty-first century. Urban Studies.1997 May; 34(5-6): 745-60.
21.
American Library Association. (1999). ALA policy manual (Accessed: 5 February 2017). Available [http//www.ala.org/aboutala/governance/policymanual/updatedpolicymanual/tableofcontents].
22.
PhillipsAL. What do we mean by library leadership? Leadership in LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science.2014 Oct 1; 55(4): 336.
23.
ChuH. iSchools and non-iSchools in the USA: An examination of their master’s programs. Education for Information.2012 Jan 1; 29(1): 1-7.
24.
ZhangYWildemuthBM. Qualitative analysis of content. In WildemuthBM, Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited; 2009.
