The aim of this study was to examine the role of publicity (private versus public) and medium (face-to-face versus cyber) in adolescents’ coping strategies for hypothetical victimization, while also considering culture. Participants were adolescents from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. The study also controlled for adolescents’ gender, individualism, and collectivism. Adolescents completed questionnaires on the hypothetical coping strategies that they would use for four scenarios, including public face-to-face victimization, public cyber victimization, private face-to-face victimization, and private cyber victimization. Overall, the findings revealed that adolescents relied more on avoidance, social support, retaliation, helplessness, and ignoring for public and face-to-face forms of victimization than for private and cyber forms of victimization. Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies are discussed.
AdamsC. (2010). Cyberbullying: How to make it sto. Instructor, 120, 44–49.
2.
AkbulutY., SahinT.L., & EristiB. (2010). Cyberbullying victimization among Turkish online social utility members. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 192–201.
3.
BarlettC.P., GentileD.A., AndersonC.A., SuzukiK., SakamotoA., YamaokaA., & KatsuraR. (2013). Cross-cultural differences in cyberbullying behavior: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 300–313. doi: 10.1177/0022022113504622
4.
BroderickP.C. (1998). Early adolescent gender differences in the use of ruminative and distracting coping strategies. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 173–191. doi: 10.1177/0272431698018002003
5.
BrunnerJ., & LewisD. (2007). Ten strategies to address bullying. Principal Leadership: High School Edition, 7, 73–75.
6.
BullockL.M., Wong-LoM., & GableR.A. (2011). Cyberbullying: What is it and how can we combat it?Preventing School Failure, 55, 63. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2011.539424
7.
CorcoranL., Mc GuckinC., & PrenticeG. (2015). Cyberbullying or cyber aggression? A review of existing definitions of cyber-based peer-to-peer aggression. Societies, 5, 245–255. doi: 10.3390/soc5020245
8.
DiddenR., ScholteR.H.J., KorziliusH., de MoorJ.M.H., VermeulenA., O’ReillyM., LangR., & LancioniG.E. (2009). Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12, 146–151. doi: 10.1080/17518420902971356
9.
EndersC. (2010) Applied missing data analysisNew York: Guilford Press.
10.
Erdur-BakerO. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12, 109–125. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341260
11.
EshenbeckH., KohlmannC., & LohausA. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 18–26. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.18
12.
EssauC.A., & TrommsdorffG. (1996). Coping with university-related problems: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 315–328. doi: 10.1177/0022022196273004
13.
FlammerA., ItoT., LuthiR., PlaschyN., ReberR., ZurbriggenL., & SugimineH. (1995). Coping with control-failure in Japanese and Swiss adolescents. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 277–288.
14.
GriggD. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 143–156. doi: 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143
15.
HampelP., & PetermannF. (2005). Age and gender effects on coping in children and adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 34, 73–83. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-3207-9
16.
HindujaS., & PatchinJ.W. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization. Journal of School Violence, 6, 89–112. doi: 10.1300/J202v06n03_06
17.
HoxJ. (2010) Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applicationNew York: Routledge.
18.
HuangY., & ChouC. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1581–1590. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005
19.
KowalskiR.M., & LimberS.P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
20.
LamA.G., & ZaneN.W.S. (2004). Ethnic differences in coping with interpersonal stressors: A test of self-construals as cultural mediators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 446–459. doi: 10.1177/0022022104266108
21.
LazarusR.S., & FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
LivingstoneS., HaddonL., GörzigA., & ÓlafssonK. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full FindingsLSE, London: EU Kids Online.
24.
MarcumC.D., HigginsG.E., FreiburgerT.L., & RickettsM.L. (2012). Battle of the sexes: An examination of male and female cyber bullying. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6, 904–911.
25.
MarsellaA.J., & Dash-ScheuerA. (1988). Coping, culture, and health human development: A research and conceptual overview. In DasenP.R., BerryJ.W., & SartoriusN., (Eds.), Health and cross-cultural psychology: Towards applications (pp. 162–178). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
NewmanM.L., HoldenG.W., & DelvilleY. (2011). Coping with the stress of being bullied: Consequences of coping strategies among college students. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 205–211. doi: 10.1177/1948550610386388
27.
OrtegaR., ElipeP., Mora-MerchanJ.A., CalmaestraJ., & VegaE. (2009). The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 217, 197–204. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.197
28.
ParkC.L., & FolkmanS. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1, 115–144. doi: 10.1037/1089.2680.1.2.115
29.
PerrenS., CorcoranL., CowieH., DehueF., GarciaD.J., Mc GuckinC., & VollinkT. (2012). Tackling cyberbullying: Review of empirical evidence regarding successful responses by students, parents, and schools. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 283–292.
30.
SmithP.K., MahdaviJ., CarvalhoM., FisherS., RussellS., & TippettN. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
31.
SnakenborgJ., Van AckerR., & GableR.A. (2011). Cyberbullying: Prevention and intervention to protect our children and youth. Preventing School Failure, 55, 88–95. doi: 10.1080/1045988x.2011.539454
32.
SnijdersT., & BoskerR., (2012) Multilevel analysis: An introduction to and advanced multilevel modelingLondon: Sage.
33.
SticcaF., & PerrenS. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying.&. Adolescence, 42, 739–750. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3
34.
TerryD.J. (1994). Determinants of coping: The role of stable and situational factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 895–910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.895
35.
WrightM.F. (2015). Cyber victimization and adjustment difficulties: The mediation of Chinese and American adolescents’ digital technology usage. CyberPsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research in Cyberspace, 1(1), 1. doi: 10.5817/CP2015-1-7
36.
WrightM.F., AoyamaI., KambleS.V., LiZ., SoudiS., LeiL., & ShuC. (2015). Peer attachment and cyber aggression involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese adolescents. Societies, 5, 339–353. doi: 10.3390/soc5020339
37.
WrightM.F., & LiY. (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Adolescence, 42, 662–674. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3
