Immigrant and refugee youth are at elevated risk for joining gangs, which, in turn, is
associated with a host of maladaptive outcomes. Previous literature on risk and protective
factors for immigrant and refugee youth gang involvement has been inconclusive. Applying a
developmental ecological systems approach, this study investigated contextual influences
on immigrant and refugee gang involvement across three ecological systems (i.e., ontogenic
system, microsystem, and exosystem). Participants included 81 immigrant and refugee youth
aged 12–20 years (Mage = 15.68; 54.3% female) who completed
self-report questionnaires assessing gang involvement and multiple risk and protective
factors. Multivariate analyses revealed that racial discrimination, negative parenting,
and exposure to community violence were positively associated with gang involvement,
whereas peer support was negatively related to gang involvement. Future research should
examine how to mitigate risk factors from multiple ecological systems. One potential
avenue is to develop alternative prosocial settings in which these youth feel supported
and valued.
BarrettA.N., KupermincG.P., &
LewisK.M.
(2013). Acculturative stress and gang involvement among
Latinos: U.S.-born versus immigrant youth. Hispanic Journal of
Behavioral Sciences, 35,
370–389. doi: 10.1177/0739986313488086
2.
BassaniC., &
GeorgeM.A.
(2012). Social capital and immigrant youth’s well-being in
Canada. In BassaniC. (Ed.),
Adolescent behaviour, (pp. 3–33).
Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science
Publishers.
3.
BirmanD., &
TrickettE.J.
(2001). Cultural transitions in first-generation immigrants:
Acculturation of Soviet Jewish refugee adolescents and parents.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32,
456–477. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032004006
4.
BronfenbrennerU.
(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and
design. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
5.
BronfenbrennerU.
(1994) Ecological models of human
development. In HusenT., &
PostletwaitheT.N. (Eds.),
International encyclopedia of education, 3
(2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647).
Oxford:
Elsevier.
6.
BuchananR.M.
(1994). Intergenerational and gender differences in acculturation:
Implications for adolescent-family adjustment. Unpublished master’s thesis.
University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
7.
ChongV., UmK.,
HahnM., PhengD., YeeC.,
& AuerswaldC.
(2009). Toward an intersectional understanding of violence
and resilience: An exploratory study of young Southeast Asian men in alameda and contra
costa county, California. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 14, 461–469. doi:
10.1016/j.avb.2009.07.001
8.
DinhK.T., WeinsteinT.L., TeinJ.Y., &
RoosaM.W.
(2013). A mediation model of the relationship of cultural
variables to internalizing and externalizing problem behavior among Cambodian American
youth. Asian American Journal of Psychology,
4, 176–184. doi: 10.1037/a0030165
9.
DurlakJ.A., WeissbergR.P., &
PachanM.
(2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to
promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 45,
294–309. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6
FrickP.J.
(1991). The Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Unpublished
instrument. University of Alabama.
12.
HongJ.S.
(2010). Understanding Vietnamese youth gangs in America: An
ecological systems analysis. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 15, 253–260. doi:
10.1016/j.avb.2010.01.003
13.
HongJ.S., HuangH., GoldenM., UptonD.P., &
WashingtonT.
(2014). Are community violence-exposed youth at risk of
engaging in delinquent behavior? A review and implications for residential treatment
research and practice. Residential Treatment for Children &
Youth, 31, 266–283. 10.1080/0886571X.2014.958343
HowellJ.C., &
EgleyA.J.
(2005). Moving risk factors into developmental theories of
gang membershi. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,
3, 334–354. doi: 10.1177/1541204005278679
16.
IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,
Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
17.
JoeK.A., & Chesney-LindM.
(1995). Just every mother’s angel”: An analysis of gender
and ethnic variations in youth gang membershi. Gender &
Society, 9, 408–431. doi:
10.1177/089124395009004002
18.
KamJ.A., & LazarevicV.
(2013). The stressful (and not so stressful) nature of
language brokering: Identifying when brokering functions as a cultural stressor for
Latino immigrant children in early adolescence. Journal of Youth
and Adolescence, 43, 1–18. doi:
10.1007/s10964-013-0061-z
19.
KrohnM.D., WardJ.T., ThornberryT.P.,
LizotteA.J., &
ChuR. (2011).
The cascading effects of adolescent gang involvement across the life
course. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
49, 991–1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00250.x
20.
KulisS., MarsigliaF.F., SicotteD., &
NieriT.
(2007). Neighborhood effects on youth substance use in a
southwestern city. Sociological Perspectives,
50, 273–301. doi: 10.1525/so2007.50.2.273
21.
LatzmanR.D., ChanW.Y., &
ShishidoY.
(2013). Impulsivity moderates the association between racial
discrimination and alcohol problems. Addictive
Behaviors, 38, 2898–2904. doi:
10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.020
LeeR.M., ChoeJ.,
KimG., & NgoV.
(2000). Construction of the Asian American Family Conflicts
Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
47, 211–222. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.2.211
24.
LenziM., SharkeyJ., VienoA., MaywormA., DoughertyD., &
Nylund-GibsonK.
(2014). Adolescent gang involvement: The role of individual,
family, peer, and school factors in a multilevel perspective.
Aggressive Behavior, 41,
1–12. doi: 10.1002/ab.21562
25.
LernerR.M., AlmerigiJ.B., TheokasC., &
LernerJ.V.
(2005). Positive youth development: A view of the
issues. The Journal of Early Adolescence,
25, 10–16. doi: 10.1177/0272431604273211
26.
MastenA.S., &
TellegenA.
(2012). Resilience in developmental psychopathology:
Contributions of the Project Competence Longitudinal Study.
Development and Psychopathology, 24,
345–361. doi: 10.1017/S095457941200003X
27.
MeldeC., & EsbensenF.A.
(2011). Gang membership as a turning point in the life
course. Criminology, 49,
513–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00227.x
28.
MillerH.V., BarnesJ.C., &
HartleyR.D.
(2011). Reconsidering Hispanic gang membership and
acculturation in a multivariate context. Crime &
Delinquency, 57, 331–355. doi:
10.1177/0011128709348460
29.
MoffittT.E.
(1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent
antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological
Review, 100, 674–701. doi:
10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
30.
NadalK.L.
(2011). The Racial and Ethnic Microaggressions Scale (REMS):
Construction, reliability, and validity. Journal ofCounseling
Psychology, 58, 470–480. doi:
10.1037/a0025193
NgoH.V.
(2010). Unravelling identities and belonging: Criminal gang
involvement of youth from immigrant families. Calgary,
AB: Centre for
Newcomers.
33.
ParkY.S., KimB.S.K., ChiangJ., &
JuC.M. (2010).
Acculturation, enculturation, parental adherence to Asian cultural
values, parenting styles, and family conflict among Asian American college
students. Asian American Journal of Psychology,
1, 67–79. doi: 10.1037/a0018961
34.
PhinneyJ.S.
(1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure:A new scale
for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent
Research, 7, 156–176. doi:
10.1177/074355489272003
35.
PillenM.B., &
Hoewig-RobersonR.C.
(1992). Determining youth gang membership: Development of a
self-report instrument. Bloomington, IL:
Chestnut Health Systems.
36.
PumariegaA.J.,
RotheE., & PumariegaJ.B.
(2005). Mental health of immigrants and
refugees. Community Mental Health Journal,
41, 581–597. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-6363-1
37.
RichtersJ.E.,
MartinezP.
(1992). Things I Have Seen and Heard: A structured interview for
assessing young children’s violence exposure. Rockville,
MD: National Institute of Mental
Health.
38.
RossiterM.J., &
RossiterK.R.
(2009). Diamonds in the rough: Bridging gaps in supports for
at-risk immigrant and refugee youth. Journal of International
Migration and Integration, 10,
409–429. doi: 10.1007/s12134-009-0110-3
39.
RosnowR.L., &
RosenthalR.
(1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of
knowledge in psychological science. American
Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276
40.
SamaniegoR.Y., &
GonzalesN.A.
(1999). Multiple mediators of the effects of acculturation
status on delinquency for Mexican American adolescents. American
Journal of Community Psychology, 27,
189–210. doi: 10.1023/A:1022883601126
41.
SivanA., KochL.,
BaierC., & AdigaM.
(1999). Refugee youth at risk: A quest for rational
policy. Children ’s Services: Social Policy, Research, and
Practice, 2, 139–158. doi:
10.1207/s15326918cs0203_2
42.
SueD.W., & EsquilinM.
(2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life:
Implications for clinical practices.
American Psychologist, 62,
271–286. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
43.
ThaiN.D.
(2003). Vietnamese youth gangs in Honolulu.
Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community,
25, 47–64. doi: 10.1300/J005v25n02_04
44.
ThornberryT.P.,
KrohnM.D., LizotteA.J., SmithC.A., &
TobinK. (2003)
Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. New
York: Cambridge University
Press.
