BACKGROUND: Surgical flaps have become reliable tools in the microsurgical armamentarium, but are still faced with tissue loss due to impaired perfusion which can lead to complete flap failure. Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) has been demonstrated to be an effective way to improve microcirculation in surgical flaps in humans. However, little is known about the optimal amount and length of RIC cycles.
OBJECTIVE: Determination of a superior protocol for RIC of cutaneous microcirculation in humans.
METHODS: 60 healthy volunteers were randomized into different groups and received a RIC protocol, consisting of three cycles of either 1 second, 1, 5, or 10 minutes of ischemia followed by ten minutes of reperfusion. RIC was applied with a inflatable tourniquet placed on the upper arm. Changes in microcirculation were assessed via combined laser doppler/spectroscopy (O2C device) at the anterior lateral thigh. Relative increase at the end of conditioning vs. baseline measurements was calculated and compared between groups.
RESULTS: RIC caused significant changes in cutaneous microcirculation (p < 0.05) which were more pronounced in groups with longer ischemia intervals. The ten minutes group was significantly superior.
CONCLUSION: A conditioning protocol containing three cycles of ten minutes of ischemia is superior to protocols with shorter ischemia intervals for RIC of cutaneous microcirculation.
KnoblochK. and VogtP.M., The reconstructive clockwork of the twenty-first century: An extension of the concept of the reconstructive ladder and reconstructive elevator, Plast Reconstr Surg126(4) (2010), 220e–222e.
2.
WeiF.-C., JainV., CelikN., ChenH.-C., ChuangD.C.-C. and LinC.-H., Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps, Plast Reconstr Surg109(7) (2002), 2219–2226.
3.
MotakefS., MountziarisP.M., IsmailI.K., AgagR.L. and PatelA., Emerging paradigms in perioperative management for microsurgical free tissue transfer: Review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines, Plast Reconstr Surg135(1) (2015), 290–299.
4.
HarderY., AmonM., LaschkeM.W., SchrammR., RuckerM., WettsteinR., et al., An old dream revitalised: Preconditioning strategies to protect surgical flaps from critical ischaemia and ischaemia-reperfusion injury, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg61(5) (2008), 503–511.
5.
KolbenschlagJ., HellmichS., GermannG. and MegerleK., Free tissue transfer in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease: Functional outcome in reconstruction of chronic lower extremity defects, J Reconstr Microsurg29(9) (2013), 607–614.
6.
BaumeisterS.P., SpiererR., ErdmannD., SweisR., LevinL.S. and GermannG.K., A realistic complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps in a multimorbid patient group, Plast Reconstr Surg112(1) (2003), 129–40; discussion 41-2.
7.
WangW.Z., BaynosaR.C. and ZamboniW.A., Update on ischemia-reperfusion injury for the plastic surgeon: 2011, Plast Reconstr Surg128(6) (2011), 685e–692e.
MengerM.D., RuckerM. and VollmarB., Capillary dysfunction in striated muscle ischemia/reperfusion: On the mechanisms of capillary “no-reflow”, Shock (Augusta, Ga)8(1) (1997), 2–7.
10.
MichielsC., Physiological and pathological responses to hypoxia, Am J Pathol164(6) (2004), 1875–1882.
11.
JokusziesA., NiederbichlerA., Meyer-MarcottyM., LahodaL.U., ReimersK. and VogtP.M., Influence of transendothelial mechanisms on microcirculation: Consequences for reperfusion injury after free flap transfer. Previous, current, and future aspects, J Reconstr Microsurg22(7) (2006), 513–518.
12.
ZhouJ., ZimmermannK., KriegT., SoltowM., PavlovicD., CernyV., et al., Adenosine receptor activation improves microcirculation in experimental intestinal ischemia/reperfusion, Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation59(3) (2015), 257–265.
ReinischJ.F., The pathophysiology of skin flap circulation. The delay phenomenon, Plast Reconstr Surg54(5) (1974), 585–598.
16.
HarderY., AmonM., SchrammR., GeorgiM., BanicA., ErniD., et al., Heat shock preconditioning reduces ischemic tissue necrosis by Heat Shock Protein (HSP)-32-mediated improvement of the microcirculation rather than induction of ischemic tolerance, Annals of Surgery242(6) (2005), 869–879.
17.
JancsoG., AratoE., HardiP., NagyT., PinterO. and FazekasG., et al., Controlled reperfusion decreased reperfusion induced oxidative stress and evoked inflammatory response in experimental aortic-clamping animal model, Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation63(3) (2016), 217–234.
18.
HeuschG., BotkerH.E., PrzyklenkK., RedingtonA. and YellonD., Remote ischemic conditioning, J Am Coll Cardiol65(2) (2015), 177–195.
19.
HausenloyD.J. and YellonD.M., The therapeutic potential of ischemic conditioning: An update, Nat Rev Cardiol8(11) (2011), 619–629.
20.
SzijartoA., CziganyZ., TurocziZ. and HarsanyiL., Remote ischemic perconditioning–a simple, low-risk method to decrease ischemic reperfusion injury: Models, protocols and mechanistic background. A review, J Surg Res178(2) (2012), 797–806.
21.
GrauM., KollikowskiA. and BlochW., Remote ischemia preconditioning increases red blood cell deformability through red blood cell-nitric oxide synthase activation, Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation63(3) (2016), 185–197.
22.
KuntscherM.V., HartmannB. and GermannG., Remote ischemic preconditioning of flaps: A review, Microsurgery25(4) (2005), 346–352.
23.
KolbenschlagJ., SogorskiA., KapalschinskiN., HaratiK., LehnhardtM., DaigelerA., et al., Remote ischemic conditioning improves blood flow and oxygen saturation in pedicled and free surgical flaps, Plast Reconstr Surg138(5) (2016), 1089–1097.
24.
KraemerR., LorenzenJ., KabbaniM., HeroldC., BuscheM., VogtP.M., et al., Acute effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on cutaneous microcirculation–a controlled prospective cohort study, BMC Surg11 (2011), 32.
25.
KolbenschlagJ., SogorskiA., HaratiK., DaigelerA., WiebalckA., LehnhardtM., et al., Upper extremity ischemia is superior to lower extremity ischemia for remote ischemic conditioning of antero-lateral thigh cutaneous blood flow, Microsurgery35(3) (2015), 211–217.
26.
JohnsenJ., PrydsK., SalmanR., LofgrenB., KristiansenS.B. and BotkerH.E., The remote ischemic preconditioning algorithm: Effect of number of cycles, cycle duration and effector organ mass on efficacy of protection, Basic Res Cardiol111(2) (2016), 10.
27.
LoukogeorgakisS.P., PanagiotidouA.T., BroadheadM.W., DonaldA., DeanfieldJ.E. and MacAllisterR.J., Remote ischemic preconditioning provides early and late protection against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans: Role of the autonomic nervous system, J Am Coll Cardiol46(3) (2005), 450–456.
28.
CandilioL., MalikA. and HausenloyD.J., Protection of organs other than the heart by remote ischemic conditioning, J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)14(3) (2013), 193–205.
29.
ZhangY., XuH., WangT., HeJ., WeiJ., WangT., et al., Remote limb ischemic post-conditioning attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat skin flapby limiting oxidative stress, Acta Cir Bras31(1) (2016), 15–21.
30.
BeiW.J., DuanC.Y., ChenJ.Y., WangK., LiuY.H., LiuY., et al., Remote ischemic conditioning for preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions/coronary angiography: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther21(1) (2016), 53–63.
31.
HeuschG., Molecular basis of cardioprotection: Signal transduction in ischemic pre-, post-, and remote conditioning, Circ Res116(4) (2015), 674–699.
32.
GarrattK.N., WhittakerP. and PrzyklenkK., Remote Ischemic Conditioning and the Long Road to Clinical Translation: Lessons Learned From ERICCA and RIPHeart, Circ Res118(7) (2016), 1052–1054.
33.
LimS.Y., YellonD.M. and HausenloyD.J., The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning, Basic Res Cardiol105(5) (2010), 651–655.
34.
HausenloyD.J. and YellonD.M., Preconditioning and postconditioning: Underlying mechanisms and clinical application, Atherosclerosis204(2) (2009), 334–341.
35.
YangM., AngelM.F., PangY., AngelJ.J., WangZ., NeumeisterM.W., et al., Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in muscle flaps treated with ischemic postconditioning, Hand (N Y)7(3) (2012), 297–302.
36.
KuntscherM.V., JuranS., AltmannJ., MenkeH., GebhardM.M. and GermannG., Role of nitric oxide in the mechanism of preclamping and remote ischemic preconditioning of adipocutaneous flaps in a rat model, J Reconstr Microsurg19(1) (2003), 55–60.
37.
KuntscherM.V., KastellT., AltmannJ., MenkeH., GebhardM.M. and GermannG., Acute remote ischemic preconditioning II: The role of nitric oxide, Microsurgery22(6) (2002), 227–231.
38.
KuoY.R., WangF.S., JengS.F., LutzB.S., HuangH.C. and YangK.D., Nitrosoglutathione improves blood perfusion and flap survival by suppressing iNOS but protecting eNOS expression in the flap vessels after ischemia/reperfusion injury, Surgery135(4) (2004), 437–446.
39.
OkorieM.I., BhavsarD.D., RidoutD., CharakidaM., DeanfieldJ.E., LoukogeorgakisS.P., et al., Postconditioning protects against human endothelial ischaemia-reperfusion injury via subtype-specific KATP channel activation and is mimicked by inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, Eur Heart J32(10) (2011), 1266–1274.
40.
BravermanI.M., The cutaneous microcirculation, The Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings5(1) (2000), 3–9.
41.
LambertE.A., ThomasC., HemmesR., EikelisN., PathakA., SchlaichM.P., et al., Sympathetic nervous response to ischemia-reperfusion injury in man is altered with remote ischemic preconditioning, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2016), ajpheart.00369.2016.
42.
KonstantinovI.E., ArabS., KharbandaR.K., LiJ., CheungM.M., CherepanovV., et al., The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans, Physiol Genomics19(1) (2004), 143–150.
43.
HeuschG. and SchulzR., Preservation of peripheral vasodilation as a surrogate of cardioprotection? The mechanistic role of ATP-dependent potassium channels and the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, Eur Heart J32(10) (2011), 1184–1186.
44.
RedingtonK.L., DisenhouseT., StrantzasS.C., GladstoneR., WeiC., TropakM.B., et al., Remote cardioprotection by direct peripheral nerve stimulation and topical capsaicin is mediated by circulating humoral factors, Basic Res Cardiol107(2) (2012), 241.
45.
SteensrudT., LiJ., DaiX., ManlhiotC., KharbandaR.K. and TropakM., et al., Pretreatment with the nitric oxide donor SNAP or nerve transection blocks humoral preconditioning by remote limb ischemia or intra-arterial adenosine, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol299(5) (2010), H1598–H1603.
46.
HepponstallM., IgnjatovicV., BinosS., MonagleP., JonesB. and CheungM.H., et al., Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) modifies plasma proteome in humans, PLoS One7(11) (2012), e48284.
47.
SkyschallyA., GentS., AmanakisG., SchulteC., KleinbongardP. and HeuschG., Across-species transfer of protection by remote ischemic preconditioning with species-specific myocardial signal transduction by reperfusion injury salvage kinase and survival activating factor enhancement pathways, Circ Res117(3) (2015), 279–288.
48.
Jean-St-MichelE., ManlhiotC., LiJ., TropakM., MichelsenM.M., SchmidtM.R., et al., Remote preconditioning improves maximal performance in highly trained athletes, Med Sci Sports Exerc43(7) (2011), 1280–1286.
49.
PickardJ.M., DavidsonS.M., HausenloyD.J. and YellonD.M., Co-dependence of the neural and humoral pathways in the mechanism of remote ischemic conditioning, Basic Res Cardiol111(4) (2016), 50.
50.
MastitskayaS., MarinaN., GourineA., GilbeyM.P., SpyerK.M., TeschemacherA.G., et al., Cardioprotection evoked by remote ischaemic preconditioning is critically dependent on the activity of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones, Cardiovasc Res95(4) (2012), 487–494.
51.
ZahirT.M., ZahirK.S., SyedS.A., RestifoR.J. and ThomsonJ.G., Ischemic preconditioning of musculocutaneous flaps: Effects of ischemia cycle length and number of cycles, Ann Plast Surg40(4) (1998), 430–435.
52.
NickelF.T., OttS., MohringerS., SaakeM., DorflerA., SeifertF., et al., Brain correlates of short-term habituation to repetitive electrical noxious stimulation, European Journal of Pain (London, England)18(1) (2014), 56–66.
53.
PrzyklenkK., Ischaemic conditioning: Pitfalls on the path to clinical translation, Br J Pharmacol172(8) (2015), 1961–1973.
54.
McCaffertyK., ForbesS., ThiemermannC. and YaqoobM.M., The challenge of translating ischemic conditioning from animal models to humans: The role of comorbidities, Dis Model Mech7(12) (2014), 1321–1333.
55.
FerdinandyP., HausenloyD.J., HeuschG., BaxterG.F. and SchulzR., Interaction of risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications with ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection by preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning, Pharmacol Rev66(4) (2014), 1142–1174.
