Perfusion quantification of vascular malformations using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with time intensity curve analysis before and after treatment: First results
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May 13, 2016
Perfusion quantification of vascular malformations using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with time intensity curve analysis before and after treatment: First results
AIM: Aim of this pilot-study was to quantify perfusion changes of vascular malformations before and after the first interventional treatment using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 29 patients (10 male, 19 female) between 6 and 63 years (mean 28.1 years) with 12 arterio-venous (AVM) and 17 venous malformations (VM) were examined before and after their first percutaneous interventional treatment. CEUS was performed with a 2.4 ml bolus injection of sulfur-hexafluorid microbubbles, and a 6–9 MHz mulitfrequency transducer. A 60 sec cine sequence was recorded and regions of interest (10 mm×30 mm) were defined in the centre, and the margins of the vascular malformation as well as in the surrounding healthy tissue. Time Intensity Curves (TIC) were analysed, and Time to Peak (TTP) as well as Area under the Curve (AUC) were calculated.
RESULTS: For VM there was a significant perfusion difference (p < 0.05) in AUC between centre and the surrounding tissue before (323.1 vs. 130.4 rU) and after treatment (331.0 vs. 106.9 rU). There was no significant difference for TTP in ROIs of VM (19.1 vs. 26.5 sec). After the treatment there was a significant decrease in AUC for all three regions in AVMs, and an increase in TTP for AVM. However TTP for AVM in the centre ROI still remained shorter than in the surrounding tissue even after therapy (20.9 vs. 25.4 sec).
CONCLUSION: CEUS with TIC analysis is a promising imaging method for the evaluation of perfusion before and after percutaneous treatment of vascular malformations. AUC decrease indicates therapy-induced changes in perfusion of VM whereas an increase in TTP shows therapy-related changes in AVM.
BeyerL.P., PreglerB., WiesingerI., StroszczynskiC., WiggermannP. and JungE.M., Continuous dynamic registration of microvascularization of liver tumors with contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Radiol Res Pract (2014), 347416.
3.
ClevertD.A., D’AnastasiM. and JungE.M., Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microcirculation: Efficiency through dynamics–current developments, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc53 (2013), 171–186.
4.
De MarchiA.,
PreverE.B.,
CavalloF.,
PozzaS.,
LinariA.,
LombardoP.,
ComandoneA.,
PianaR. and FalettiC., Perfusion pattern and time of vascularisation with CEUS increase accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant tumours in 216 musculoskeletal soft tissue masses, Eur J Radiol84 (2015), 142–150.
5.
DietrichC.F., AverkiouM.A., CorreasJ.M., LassauN., LeenE. and PiscagliaF., An EFSUMB introduction into dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion, Ultraschall Med33 (2012), 344–351.
6.
GeisS., PrantlL., DoldererJ., LambyP., MuellerS. and JungE.M., Postoperative monitoring of local and free flaps with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)–analysis of 112 patients, Ultraschall Med34 (2013), 550–558.
7.
GeisS., PrantlL., MuellerS., GosauM., LambyP. and JungE.M., Quantitative assessment of bone microvascularization after osteocutaneous flap transplantation using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), Ultraschall Med34 (2013), 272–279.
8.
GirlichC., JungE.M., HuberE., OttC., IesalnieksI., SchreyerA. and SchachererD., Comparison between preoperative quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and operative macroscopic findings and results of histopathological scoring in Crohn’s disease, Ultraschall Med32 (2011), 154–159.
9.
GreisC., Technical aspects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations: Tips and tricks, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc58 (2014), 89–95.
10.
JungE.M., ClevertD.A., SchreyerA.G., SchmittS., RennertJ., KubaleR., FeuerbachS. and JungF., Evaluation of quantitative contrast harmonic imaging to assess malignancy of liver tumors: A prospective controlled two-center study, World J Gastroenterol13 (2007), 6356–6364.
11.
KlotzL.V., IngrischM., EichhornM.E., NiemoellerO., SiedekV., GurkovR. and ClevertD.A., Monitoring parotid gland tumors with a new perfusion software for contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc58 (2014), 261–269.
12.
MulderA.H., van DijkA.P.,
SmitsP. and
TackC.J., Real-time contrast imaging: A new method to monitor capillary recruitment in human forearm skeletal muscle, Microcirculation15 (2008), 203–213.
13.
RennertJ., DorniaC., GeorgievaM., RoehrlS., FellnerC., SchlederS., StroszczynskiC. and JungE.M., Identification of early complications following liver transplantation using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). First results, J Gastrointestin Liver Dis21(2012), 407–412.
14.
TeuschV.I., WohlgemuthW.A., PiehlerA.P. and JungE.M., Color-coded perfusion analysis of CEUS for pre-interventional diagnosis of microvascularisation in cases of vascular malformations, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc58 (2014), 183–193.
