The objective of this phantom study is to demonstrate the potential of utilizing mid-energy x-rays for in-line phase-sensitive breast cancer imaging by phantom studies.
METHODS:
The midenergy (50–80 kV) in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype was used to acquire images of the contrast-detail mammography (CDMAM) phantom, an ACR accreditation phantom, and an acrylic edge phantom. The low-dose mid-energy phase-sensitive images were acquired at 60 kV with a radiation dose of 0.9 mGy, while the high-energy phase-sensitive images were acquired at 90 kV with a radiation dose of 1.2 mGy. The Phase-Attenuation Duality (PAD) principle for soft tissue was used for the phase retrieval. A blind observer study was conducted and paired-sample T-test were performed to compare the mean differences in the two imaging systems.
RESULTS:
The correct detection ratio for the CDMAM phantom for phase-contrast images acquired by the low-dose mid-energy system was 56.91%, whereas images acquired by the high-energy system correctly revealed only 40.97% of discs. The correct detection ratios were 57.88% and 43.41% for phase-retrieved images acquired by the low-dose mid-energy and high-energy imaging systems, respectively. The reading scores for all three groups of objects in the ACR phantom were higher for the mid energy imaging system as compared to the high-energy system for both phase-contrast and phase-retrieved images. The calculated edge enhancement index (EEI) from the acrylic edge phantom image for the mid-energy system was higher than that calculated for the high-energy imaging system. The quantitative analyses showed a higher Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) as well as a higher Figure of Merit (FOM) in images acquired by the low-dose mid-energy imaging system.
CONCLUSION:
The PAD based retrieval method can be applied in mid-energy system without remarkably affecting the image quality, and in fact, it improves the lesion detectability with a patient dose saving of 25%.
ArfelliF.et al., Low-dose phase-contrast x-ray medical imaging, Physics in Medicine & Biology43 (1998), 2845–2852. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/013.
2.
BeltranM.A.PaganinD.M.et al., 2D and 3D X-ray phase retrieval of multi-material objects using a single defocus distance, Optic Express18 (2010), 6423–6436. doi:10.1364/OE.18.006423.
3.
BijkerkK.R.LindeijerJ.M. and ThijssenM.A.O., Manual CDMAM Phantom, 10-11, 1995.
4.
BooneJ.JohnM. and SeibertJ.A., A figure of merit comparison between bremsstrahlung and monoenergetic x-ray sources for angiography, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology4(4) (1994), 334–345. doi:10.3233/XST-1994-4408.
5.
BooneJ.M., Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data, Medical Physics29(5) (2002), 869–875. doi:10.1118/1.1472499.
6.
BravinA.CoanP.et al., X-ray phase-contrast imaging: From pre-clinical applications towards clinics, Physics in Medicine & Biology58 (2013), R1–R35. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/1/R1.
7.
CastelliE.TonuttiM.et al., Mammography with synchrotron radiation: First clinical experience with phase-detection technique, Radiology259(3) (2011), 684–694. doi:10.1148/radiol.11100745.
8.
DiemozP.C.BravinA.et al., A method for high-energy, low-dose mammography using edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging, Physics in medicine & biology61(24) (2016), 8750–8761. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8750.
9.
DiemozP.C.BravinA. and CoanP., Theoretical comparison of three X-ray phase-contrast imaging techniques: Propagation-based imaging analyzer-based imaging and grating interferometry, Optic Express20(3) (2012), 2789–2805. doi:10.1364/OE.20.002789.
10.
DonnellyE. and PriceR., Effect of kVp on edge-enhancement index in phase-contrast radiography, Medical Physics29 (2002), 999–1002. doi:10.1118/1.1477416.
11.
DonnellyE.PriceR. and PickensD., Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography, Medical Physics30 (2003), 2888–2896. doi:10.1118/1.1617430.
12.
GhaniM.U.et al., Impact of a single distance phase retrieval algorithm on spatial resolution in X-ray inline phase sensitive imaging, Biomedical Spectroscopy and Imaging8(1–2) (2019), 29–40. doi:10.3233/BSI-190186.
13.
GhaniM.U.WongM.D.et al., Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios, Physics in Medicine & Biology62(9) (2017), 3523–3538. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa644b.
14.
GhaniM.U.WuD.et al., Detectability comparison of simulated tumors in digital breast tomosynthesis using high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive and commercial imaging systems, Physica Medica47 (2018), 34–41. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.02.012.
15.
GhaniM.U.YanA.et al., Low dose high energy X-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters, Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology23(6) (2015), 667–682. doi:10.3233/XST-150519.
16.
GrosoA.AbelaR. and StampanoiM., Implementation of a fast method for high resolution phase contrast tomography, Optic Express14 (2006), 8103–8110. doi:10.1364/OE.14.008103.
HendrickR.E., Breast MRI: Fundamentals and Technical Aspects, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
19.
KotreC.J. and BirchI.P., Phase contrast enhancement of x-ray mammography: A design study, Physics in Medicine & Biology44 (1999), 2853–2866. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/44/11/312.
20.
LewisR.A., Medical phase contrast x-ray imaging: Current status and future prospects, Physics in Medicine & Biology49 (2004), 3573–3583. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/16/005.
21.
LiuH.KarellasA.et al., Lesion detectability considerations for an optically-coupled CCD x-ray imaging system, IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science41 (1947), 1506–1509.
22.
LongoR.TonuttiM.et al., Clinical study in phase-contrast mammography: Image-quality analysis, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, physical and engineering sciences372(2010) (2014), 20130025. doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0025.
23.
MatsuoS.et al., Evaluation of edge effect due to phase-contrast imaging for mammography, Medical Physics32 (2005), 2690–2697. doi:10.1118/1.1992087.
24.
MayoP.PascualA.et al., Image quality analysis of digital mammographic equipments, in: Second European IRPA Congress on Radiation Protection, France, 2006.
25.
MomoseA., Recent advances in X-ray phase imaging, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics44 (2005), 6355–6367. doi:10.1143/JJAP.44.6355.
26.
OhuchiN.SuzukiA.et al., Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan strategic anti-cancer randomized trial (J-START): A randomized controlled trial, The Lancet387 (2016), 341–348. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00774-6.
27.
OmoumiF.H.WuD.et al., Potential of phase contrast x-ray imaging for detecting tumors in dense breast: Initial phantom studies, SPIE Conference Proceeding paper1049 (2018), 104950M.
28.
PisanoE.D.et al., Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the US food and drug administration, Academic radiology8(9) (2001), 864–870. doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80765-1.
29.
Ślusarczyk-KacprzykW.SkrzyńskiW. and FabiszewskaE., Evaluation of doses and image quality in mammography with screen-film, CR, and DR detectors – application of the ACR phantom, Polish journal of radiology81 (2016), 386–391. doi:10.12659/PJR.897304.
30.
SnigirevA.et al., On the possibilities of x-ray phase contrast microimaging by coherent high-energy synchrotron radiation, Review of Scientific Instruments66 (1995), 5486–5492. doi:10.1063/1.1146073.
31.
SobolW.T. and WuX., Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables, Medical Physics24(4) (1997), 547–554. doi:10.1118/1.597937.
32.
TothR.KiefferJ.C.et al., In-line phase-contrast imaging with a laser based hard x-ray source, Review of Scientific Instruments76 (2005), 083701. doi:10.1063/1.1989407.
33.
WongM.D.WuX. and LiuH., Image quality and dose efficiency of high energy phase-sensitive x-ray imaging: Phantom studies, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology22(3) (2014), 321–334. doi:10.3233/XST-140428.
34.
WongM.D.YanA.et al., Dose and detectability improvements with high energy phase sensitive x-ray imaging in comparison to low energy conventional imaging, Physics in Medicine & Biology59(9) (2014), N37. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/N37.
35.
WuX.BarnesG.T. and TuckerD.M., Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography, Radiology179(1) (1991), 143–148. doi:10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006265.
36.
WuX.GingoldE.L.et al., Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography, Radiology193(1) (1994), 83–89. doi:10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090926.
37.
WuX. and LiuH., Clinical implementation of x-ray phase-contrast imaging: Theoretical foundations and design considerations, Medical Physics30(8) (2003), 2169–2179. doi:10.1118/1.1593836.
38.
WuX. and LiuH., A general theoretical formalism for X-ray phase contrast imaging, Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology11(1) (2003), 33–42.
39.
WuX. and LiuH., An experimental method of determining relative phase-contrast factor for x-ray imaging systems, Medical Physics31 (2004), 997–1002. doi:10.1118/1.1688213.
40.
WuX. and LiuH., X-ray cone-beam phase tomography formulas based on phase-attenuation duality, Optic Express13(16) (2005), 6000–6014. doi:10.1364/OPEX.13.006000.
41.
WuX.LiuH. and YanA., X-ray phase attenuation duality and phase retrieval, Optic Letters30(4) (2005), 379–381. doi:10.1364/OL.30.000379.
42.
WuX. and YanA., Phase retrieval from one single phase contrast X-ray image, Optic Express17(13) (2009), 11187–11196. doi:10.1364/OE.17.011187.
43.
ZhangD.DonovanM.D.et al., Preliminary feasibility study of an in-line phase contrast x-ray imaging prototype, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering55(9) (2008), 2249–2257. doi:10.1109/TBME.2008.919136.
44.
ZhouS. and BrahmeA., Development of phase-contrast X-ray imaging techniques and potential medical applications, Physica Medica24(3) (2008), 129–148. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.05.006.
