Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Depression and anxiety are the most common mood disorders affecting 300 million sufferers worldwide. Maladaptive changes in the neuroendocrine stress response is cited as the most common underlying cause, though how the circuits underlying this response are controlled at the molecular level, remains largely unknown. Approximately 40% of patients do not respond to current treatments, indicating that untapped mechanisms exist. Here we review recent evidence implicating JNK in the control of anxiety and depressive-like behavior with a particular focus on its action in immature granule cells of the hippocampal neurogenic niche and the potential for therapeutic targeting for affective disorders.

Keywords

JNK XG-102 JNK1 kinase anxiety depression granule cell neurogenesis hippocampus molecular mechanism

Anxiety and depression are among the largest causes of disability worldwide [1]. They have complex and varied etiologies with genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors contributing to disease susceptibility. Maladaptative changes in normal stress responses leading to long lasting physical changes at the level of synapses and circuits are believed to be among the underlying causes. Antidepressant drugs have targeted the same core mechanisms for several decades, yet treatment-resistant depression is still a major problem, indicating the need for a paradigm shift [2]. Many theories of depression have been proposed, including dysregulation of monoaminergic neurotransmission, neurotrophic factors and hippocampal neurogenesis [3, 4]. However, the signalling molecules that govern mood and its underlying circuitry are largely unknown and identifying these will be essential for a comprehensive understanding of mood disorders and development of new treatments.

ADULT HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS AND DEPRESSION

Prominent studies have shown that adult hippocampal neurogenesis is required for the action of antidepressant drugs [5–8], as well as for electroconvulsive shock therapy [9]. This discovery prompted extensive studies of adult born hippocampal granule cells in the context of mood, leading to the hypothesis that depressive and anxiety symptoms can be alleviated by boosting neurogenesis in the hippocampus while impaired neurogenesis may be causal in triggering symptoms initially. Yet, this theory remains controversial as other studies have shown beneficial effects of antidepressants that were independent of neurogenesis changes [10, 11]. Our lab identified that inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in the hippocampal neurogenic niche increases the number of adult born granule cells, while alleviating anxiety behaviour [12]. More critically, we demonstrated that inhibiting JNK solely in adult born granule cells was sufficient to alleviate anxiety and depressive behavior [12]. These findings implicate JNK as a central player that controls anxiety and depression from a subpopulation of adult born granule cells in the hippocampus.

First described in the hippocampus [13], the generation of new neurons in adult brain, or “neurogenesis” occurs at a rate of about 700 new granule cells added daily per hippocampus in humans, representing 0.004% of dentate gyrus neurons [14]. Notably, adult hippocampal neurogenesis is confined to the dentate gyrus sub-region of the hippocampus in all species [15]. In rodents, the extent of neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus is higher [16], accounting for up to 0.06% of dentate gyrus granule cells in two month old mice [17, 18]. Increased neurogenesis in the dorsal hippocampus has been shown to improve spatial memory [19, 20] whereas in the ventral hippocampus, it is associated with suppression of anxiety-like behaviour [7, 21–23]. Neurogenesis in mice can be boosted by exercise or by exposure to an enriched environment [17, 22, 24], leading to improved memory [25, 26]. However, running induces neurogenesis in the dorsal and not the ventral hippocampus [27], and running-induced suppression of anxiety has been dissociated from hippocampal neurogenesis [7, 10, 11, 28].

ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION – THE HIPPOCAMPAL CONNECTION

Anxiety is a normal stress response that allows the individual to react to a threatening environment. Anxiety disorders arise when this stress response occurs in the absence of real threat. It shows a high level of comorbidity with depression and rates of secondary depression following a prior psychiatric illness, in particular anxiety, have grown significantly in modern times [29]. In depressed individuals, disease-associated structural changes take place in the hippocampus, indicating a central role for this region in the underlying pathology. Neuroimaging studies have suggested that hippocampal volume may be reduced in patients suffering from depression and anxiety [30, 31]. These findings from small patient cohorts have been validated by meta-analysis (involving 1728 major depressive disorder (MDD) patients and 7199 controls) and conclude that hippocampal volume decreases on average by 1.42% in MDD. Moreover, this decrease in hippocampal volume correlates with recurrence frequency [31]. Post-mortem studies in MDD subjects revealed loss of neuropil, i.e. neuritic matter consisting of unmyelinated axons, dendrites or glial cell processes, suggesting that neurite atrophy and synapse loss accounted for diminished volume in this region [32, 33]. Specifically in the hippocampal Cornu Ammonis-3 (CA3) region, reduced dendrite and spine density was associated with higher levels of trait anxiety and longitudinal depression scores [34, 35], while in the dentate gyrus sub-region, the number of neural progenitor cells and granule cells was reduced in MDD subjects [36, 37]. While these anatomical hallmarks of MDD suggest that levels of adult hippocampal neurogenesis may be reduced in these individuals, definitive proof that neurogenesis is impaired in humans suffering from affective disorders is still lacking. This is because no studies have used birth dating approaches to study neurogenesis in post mortem brains from humans that suffered from these disorders. Also, there are currently no methods to directly measure neurogenesis in situ in humans.

Stereological measurement of neurogenesis in post mortem brain has provided some evidence for a link between depression and adult hippocampal neurogenesis. For example, depressed subjects that received selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or tricyclic anti-depressant (TCA) drugs, showed increased neural progenitor number in the anterior (ventral) dentate gyrus compared to untreated subjects [36]. Another study showed that hippocampal volume was restored in patients that received antidepressant drugs [37]. Interestingly, the meta-analysis found no significant recovery of hippocampal volume in patients undergoing antidepressant treatment [31], possibly due to confounding interactions such as severity and duration of disease. Nonetheless, these clinical studies have provided clear evidence that structural changes occur at many levels in the hippocampus of individuals suffering from depression and anxiety and have given insight into the underlying pathology.

Similarly in animal models, the hippocampus emerges as a central regulator of depression and anxiety [38–42]. The ventral hippocampus extends connections to prefrontal cortex (PFC) [43] and forms reciprocal connections with amygdala [41], among other regions [44–46]. These circuits are highly conserved and are required for synchronized hippocampal-PFC activity and normal adaptive, anxiety behaviour [47]. Maladaptive changes in circuits emanating from the hippocampus are likely to contribute to the pathological state where anxiety is present in the absence of threat [48]. The signalling molecules driving these circuits and maladaptive changes therein are largely unknown.

c-JUN N-TERMINAL KINASES (JNKs)

JNK was originally identified as stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) that responded to a range of cellular stressors including DNA damage, oxidative stress, cytoskeletal toxins, infection and inflammation [49]. SAPK was renamed “JNK” when it was identified as the kinase responsible for phosphorylation and transcriptional activation of c-Jun [50, 51]. In brain, JNK expression is complex, with three JNK genes; JNK1 (MAPK8), JNK2 (MAPK9) and JNK3 (MAPK10) and 10 splice variants (JNK1α1, JNK1α2, JNK1β1, JNK1β2, JNK2α1, JNK2α2, JNK2β1, JNK2β2, JNK3α1, JNK3α2) being expressed [52]. JNKs are associated with inflammation, neurodegeneration and insulin resistance [53–55]. JNKs are particularly important kinases in brain where they display elevated activity in the absence of stress, indicating that brain JNKs also serve non-stress related functions. This distinguishes brain JNK from JNK in other tissues such as heart, lung, kidney, spleen and liver, where its activity is low in the absence of stress [56]. JNK1 constitutes a major component of physiologically active JNK in brain, whereas JNK2 and JNK3 isoforms exhibit lower basal activity and increased stress responsivity [57]. Yet, knockout or knockdown of all three JNK isoforms has been necessary to reveal functions for JNK in trophic deprivation-induced neuronal death [58], autophagy [59] and pituitary function [54] indicating functional redundancy between isoforms. JNK has also been shown to regulate neuropathic pain [60] and inhibition of JNK protects from neuronal death following cerebral ischemia [61, 62]. Interestingly however, with the exception of JNK regulation of pituitary function and insulin resistance [63, 64], until recently, there was relatively little known about the physiological role of JNK in adult brain based on in vivo study and behavioural analysis. Here we outline recent evidence that associates JNK with the control of mood.

JNK1 REGULATES ANXIETY AND DEPRESSIVE-LIKE BEHAVIOUR IN MICE

To gain insight on JNK1 function in adult brain, Jnk1-/- mice were subjected to a battery of behavioural tests. The most prominent results emerged from tests for anxiety where Jnk1-/- mice displayed a low anxiety phenotype in the open field, elevated plus maze and light-dark tests [12] (Table 1). In the forced swim test of behavioural despair and the sucrose deprivation test to determine anhedonic behaviour, Jnk1-/- mice displayed reduced immobility and reduced anhedonia respectively, indicating a low depressive phenotype [12] (Table 1). These behavioural phenotypes were replicated when mice underwent intracerebroventricular infusion for six weeks with a peptide inhibitor of JNK (DJNKI-1, chemically identical to XG-102) (Fig. 1A; Table 1) [12].

Fig.1

Inhibition of JNK solely in newborn granule cells of the hippocampus alleviates anxiety and depressive behaviour whereas global inhibition of JNK1 in brain boosts neurogenesis. A. Genetic ablation of Jnk1, intracerebroventricular (ICV) osmotic mini-pump infusion of DJNKI-1 (XG-102) over six weeks, or retroviral delivery of JNK inhibitor (MLV-NLS-JBD) to granule cells of the dentate gyrus for six weeks, evoke an anxiolytic and anti-depressant effect. The key finding was that specific targeting of adult born granule cell JNK was sufficient to switch behaviour to a low anxiety and low depressive state independent of neurogenesis changes [12]. B. Levels of neurogenesis were assessed in Jnk1-/- mice or DJNKI-1-treated mice. Neurogenesis was increased at several levels. There was increased proliferation (BrdU cell number, Ki67-positive cells), survival (decreased numbers of cells positive for cleaved caspase-3) and increased numbers of doublecortin (DCX)-positive and BrdU/NeuN-positive cells, representing newly born neurons. Thus global JNK1 inhibition increases hippocampal neurogenesis. However inhibition of JNK solely in immature granule cells using retroviral delivery alleviates mood without increasing neurogenesis, telling us that JNK inhibition evokes separable effects in the hippocampal neurogenic niche, both of which act to lower anxiety and depression.

Table 1

Inhibition of JNK1 lowers anxiety and depressive behaviour in mice

	Jnk1-/- 2–4 months	DJNKI-1 (XG-102) 2–4 months	MLV-NLS-JBD 2–4 months
Behavioraltests	Anxiety/depressivephenotype
EPM	↓	↓	↓
Light/Dark	↓	↓	↓
Open Field	↓	n.a.	↓
FST	↓	↓	↓
Anhedonia	↓	↓	↓

Summary of behavioural test results from Mohammad and colleagues [12]. DJNKI-1 refers to a peptide inhibitor of JNK, also known as XG-102. MLV-NLS-JBD encodes amino acids 1 to 277 of JIP1 in a MLV retroviral vector with upstream flanking nuclear localisation sequences (NLS). The JBD sequence effectively inhibits nuclear JNK in neurons [71, 107].

JNK1 ACTIVITY IN NEWBORN GRANULE CELLS OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS INDUCES ANXIOGENIC AND DEPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR

Changes in the rate of adult hippocampal neurogenesis have been implicated in the pathology of anxiety and depression [3, 65]. We therefore examined neurogenesis in Jnk1 knockout mice using birthdate labelling. These results showed that progenitor cell proliferation was increased in the dentate gyrus of mice lacking Jnk1 and that the number of adult born (BrdU/NeuN-positive) neurons was increased (Fig. 1B) [12]. Moreover, cell survival and dendrite maturation, as measured by arborisation, was elevated in Jnk1 knockout mice (Fig. 1B) [12]. Importantly, these effects were replicated upon mini-pump infusion to the ventricles with a peptide inhibitor of JNK1 for six weeks (Fig. 1B) [12]. Finally, to determine whether adult born granule cells themselves were involved in the anxiolytic response, we expressed the JNK inhibitor in a Murine Leukemia Virus (MLV) plasmid and injected it to the hilus. This enabled selective targeting of the JNK inhibitor to newly born granule cells in the hippocampus of adult mice [12]. To our surprise, JNK inhibition solely in these cells was sufficient to reduce anxiety and depressive behaviour, indicating that JNK activity in newborn granule cells of the hippocampus plays an important role in the regulation of mood. Notably, there was no increase in granule cell number in these mice. Thus, like others [10, 11], we showed that increased neurogenesis was not necessary for this behavioural switch, as inhibition of JNK in new born granule cells was sufficient to improve mood in mice without having any effect on number of immature granule cells (Fig. 1B) [12].

THE DJNKI-1 INHIBITOR OF JNK

To inhibit JNK, the peptide inhibitor of JNK, DJNKI-1 (also known as XG-102) was used. This is the minimal sequence from the JNK scaffold, JNK interacting protein-1 (JIP1) that binds to the common docking domain of JNK and competes for substrate binding [53, 66]. DJNKI-1 also encodes the transactivator of transcription (TAT) sequence from the HIV vector which facilitates cell penetration [67, 68]. Further, to improve resilience against enzymatic digestion in vivo, DJNKI-1 utilizes D-amino acids, providing stability in cells for at least two weeks [69]. DJNKI-1 is considered to be a specific inhibitor of JNK and does not inhibit the closely related ERK or p38 kinases [70]. In our hands, DJNKI-1 more potently inhibits JNK1 isoforms over JNK2 and JNK3 in vitro (Coffey lab unpublished data), however its bioactivity against JNK isoforms in vivo has not been characterised. For this reason, it is significant that we cross-validated the findings with DJNKI-1 in Jnk1-/- mice.

Our lab has earlier shown that a longer version of the JNK inhibitor peptide, amino acids 1–277 of the JNK scaffold JIP1 (JBD for JNK binding domain), increased dendrite arborisation in cultured neurons, recapitulating findings in Jnk1-/- mice where dendrite arborisation was increased in the cerebellum and motor cortex [71, 72]. Thus, it was not altogether surprising that in adult hippocampus, JNK1 constrained the arborisation of doublecortin (DCX)-positive, immature granule cells (Fig. 1B) [12]. Indeed inhibition of JNK1 proved to be a powerful stimulus for adult hippocampal neurogenesis, promoting all four stages: proliferation, survival, differentiation and maturation (Fig. 1B).

HOW COULD JNK INHIBITION IN GRANULE CELLS ALTER BEHAVIOUR?

Dentate gyrus granule cells form a major cell group of the hippocampal trisynaptic circuit. They receive excitatory input from the entorhinal cortex via perforant path axons and transmit this to CA3 pyramidal neurons via their mossy fibers. The circuit is completed by projections from CA3 to CA1 which projects back to the entorhinal cortex. Indeed, the immature granule cells of the hippocampus are particularly sensitive to perforant path input [73]. They display a lower activation threshold than resident granule cells due to their particular configuration that equips them with increased excitatory/inhibitory balance [73]. Significantly, immature granule cells negatively regulate the overall activity of resident dentate granule cells by recruiting local GABAergic inhibitory neurons [42, 73, 74]. Consistent with this, increasing neurogenesis in mice leads to reduced activity of the dentate gyrus hippocampal subregion [42, 74, 75]. Conversely, blocking neurogenesis using x-ray irradiation or chemical genetic ablation, increases dentate gyrus gamma burst amplitude and synchronized firing [76]. The ventral hippocampus forms direct monosynaptic connections to structures that regulate mood such as medial prefrontal cortex which promotes anxiety behaviour [47, 77], reciprocal connections to and from amygdala, which governs fear processing [78], and to the medial shell of the nucleus accumbens [79, 80] which controls reward seeking behaviour and susceptibility to stress [81]. Thus boosting the number of adult born granule cells, or increasing their activity, is expected to reduce the neural activity of glutamatergic projections from the ventral hippocampus to downstream structures that regulate anxiety and reward responses [42]. Indeed, it has recently been shown that excitatory output from the ventral hippocampus to the medial prefrontal cortex is required for anxious behavior [47], while reduced activity in this region is associated with stress resilience in the chronic social defeat model of depression [81]. One possibility is that JNK evokes anxiogenic behaviour by controlling properties of immature granule cells leading to increased ventral hippocampal output, though this theory requires testing.

From the molecular standpoint, there are several mechanisms whereby JNK could influence the behaviour of new born granule cells leading to changes in the activity of circuits that control mood. New born granule cells exhibit specialized features during a “critical period” from two to six weeks after birth [73]. Within this timeframe, new granule cells show a lower threshold for activation by perforant-path excitatory hippocampal input. This distinguishes them from the resident mature cells that account for ∼90% of dentate neurons and are less easily excited [73, 82]. Increased excitability of immature granule cells is dependent on high expression during the critical period, of the NKCC1 cotransporter which carries Cl^- inwards. High expression of NKCC1 (SLC12A2) results in reversal of the Cl^– potential, meaning that upon GABA-A receptor activation, Cl^– flows outwards, down its concentration gradient and the neurons become depolarized, rather than hyperpolarized [82]. As these neurons mature, NKCC2 (SCL12A1) expression increases and internal Cl^– concentrations are restored to lower levels. At this point, granule cells display typical GABA-A responses, i.e. Cl^– ions are driven outwards leading to hypolarization [83, 84]. JNK has been shown to phosphorylate NKCC1 in vitro in [85], however whether this alters the activity or expression levels of the cotransporter is not known.

Other key changes that occur to immature granule cells during the critical period include dendritic arborisation and spine formation, together representing increased capacity for synaptic integration. In this regard, we have shown that dendritic field size is increased in immature granule cells in Jnk1-/- or JNK inhibitor-treated mice [12]. NMDA receptor NR2B subunit expression is also increased during this period and facilitates synaptic plasticity [86]. Whether JNK controls NR2B expression is not known. All in all one can envisage several possible mechanisms whereby pathological activation of JNK (as outlined in Table 1) could alter properties of immature granule cells, either indirectly by altering gene expression, or directly by switching on or off protein function. More precise understanding of what JNK does in immature granule cells to alter mood will be greatly facilitated by phosphoproteomic study and analysis of circuits and gene expression.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT JNK REGULATION IN ANIMAL MODELS OF DEPRESSION?

Studies in animal models of depression have shown that JNK activity is elevated in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (Table 2) [87–93]. For example, chronic treatment with corticosterone [94], strongly activates JNK in the hippocampus [93]. Elevated levels of cortisol in depression signifies impaired feedback regulation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis [95] and contributes to long lasting synapse loss [35]. Similarly, in chronic variable stress models of depression and in acute stress models (cold followed by rewarming) [87], forced swim and tail suspension tests [91] and immobilization stress [88], JNK is hyper-activated in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (Table 2). Significantly, in the social defeat stress model of depression, JNK activity is increased in animals that are susceptible to stress and reduced in animals that are resilient [90], suggesting that JNK activity predisposes to depression and inhibition of JNK is protective. In contrast to these classic models of depression, exposure of adult rats to 21 days of social isolation (a model for depression and negative symptoms of schizophrenia [96]), does not activate JNK but slightly decreases its activity in the hippocampus and PFC [88, 92] (Table 2). While the stress response was validated in these two studies by showing increased corticosterone levels, the behavioural outcome was not monitored. The reported decrease in JNK activity may therefore represent a protective, adaptive response to social isolation in this relatively short duration isolation model. Finally, cognitive impairment induced by chronic corticosterone administration is reversed by the DJNKI-1 inhibitor [93], while DJNKI-1 also lowers baseline anxiety and depressive behaviour [12]. Together these data provide evidence that JNK is activated in rodent models of depression and that preventing this activation alleviates anxiety and depressive behaviour. Significantly also, reduced JNK activity is associated with resilience to stress.

Table 2

Regulation of JNK activity in rodent models of depression

STRESSOR OR DISEASE MODEL	JNK ACTIVITY	BEHAVIOR	CORT	REFERENCES
CHRONIC STRESS
Corticosterone 40 day (mice)	↑↑ HC	Cognitive deficit reversed by DJNKI-1	n.a.	[93]
Random varied (mice)	↑ HC	n.a.	↑	[89]
Random varied + LPS	↑↑ HC
Social defeat (mice)	↑ PFC susceptible mice	↑ Social avoidance	n.a.	[90]
	↓ PFC resilient mice	↓ Social avoidance
SOCIAL ISOLATION
Social isolation 21 day (rat)	↓ PFC	n.a.	No change	[92]
Social isolation 21 day + acute immobilization	↓ PFC	n.a.	↑
Social isolation 21 day (rat)	↓ HC/PFC	n.a.	↑	[88]
ACUTE STRESS
Cold (mice)	No effect HC/PFC	Anxiogenic	↑	[87]
Cold/rewarming	↑↑ HC/PFC/EC		↑
Forced swim	No effect HC, ↑ PFC	Depressive	n.a.	[91]
Tail suspension	↑ HC/PFC	Depressive
Cold (rat)	No effect	n.a.	↑	[92]
Immobilization	No effect	n.a.	↑
Immobilization (rat)	↑↑ HC/PFC	n.a.	↑	[88]
LPS	↑ HC	n.a.	↑	[89]

In these studies, JNK activity was measured by immunoblotting hippocampus (HC) or prefrontal cortex (PFC) with antibodies detecting active JNK (P-JNK). Chronic and acute stress models are categorized separately. Abbreviations are as follows: Lipopolysaccharide = LPS, Corticosterone = CORT, data not available = n.a.

Genetic components together with environmental influences also contribute to depression and predisposing gene anomalies are actively searched [97]. As of now, no significant genome-wide associations have been found to link the JNK pathway with MDD or bipolar disorder. Although SNPs in the JIP2 (MAPK8IP2) JNK scaffold [98] and in JNK3 (MAPK10) [99] were identified in patient cohorts, these have not shown significant genome-wide associations. Such associations may be obscured by the heterogenous nature of the disease etiology. The first genetic associations with depression are only starting to be identified and improved patient stratification and larger sample sizes will be needed to achieve a comprehensive picture of the genetic background of depression [100].

TARGETING JNK FOR DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY?

These findings from animal studies, highlight the possibility that targeting of the JNK pathway could provide a new avenue for tackling depression and anxiety. It may even provide benefit for treatment resistant depression. This raises the question as to whether unwanted side effects would be associated with systemic inhibition of JNK. JNKs, by virtue of being kinases, are involved in a variety of functions [55]. Inhibition of JNK is expected to be beneficial for several diseases including cancer, inflammatory diseases, diabetes, neurodegenerative disease, stroke [53], and more recently, depression and anxiety [12, 90]. Indeed, because JNKs are largely silent and activated by stress, there is a rationale to expect minimal side effects. However, cellular stress responses also serve important homeostatic functions. For example JNKs regulate autophagy, albeit oppositely in the periphery and CNS [59, 101]. Also, JNKs 1 and 2 are required for innate immune response signalling [102], and as discussed earlier, JNK isoforms play essential roles during brain development [55]. One can predict therefore that pan-JNK inhibitors would be precluded from use. However, because these important functions of JNKs are largely redundant between isoforms, it is anticipated that isoform-specific inhibitors, or inhibitors of specific functional modules, could be tolerated. Several years of drug development have generated a number of inhibitors against JNK, however a full panel of isoform-specific, or splice variant-specific inhibitors is not yet available [103]. In terms of tolerance, two clinical trials with small molecule ATP-competitive JNK inhibitors have been carried out [103, 104]. These were terminated due to a poor risk/benefit ratio, however these trials did not stratify patients, and it has been proposed that isoform-specific JNK inhibitors would have produced a better outcome [104]. Interestingly however, a small cohort safety trial using DJNKI-1 (XG-102, Brimapitide) reported no drug-related side effects following a single intravenous infusion [105]. Moreover, this inhibitor yielded positive results in the postoperative treatment of ocular inflammation [106], where a single injection showed similar benefit to four applications of dexamethasone over 21 days. This inhibitor is currently undergoing preclinical study for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Given the recent implications of JNK involvement in depression, it would certainly be of interest to monitor the effects of JNK inhibition on depression and anxiety symptoms in patients, if such trials go ahead.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights recent data that implicates the JNK pathway in the regulation of mood. These early findings are exciting for the following reasons. Firstly, according to current knowledge, there is no overt connection between JNK and the currently used anti-depressant drugs. Therefore, targeting of this mechanism may represent a new avenue for treatment development. Secondly, the precise localization of JNK’s anxiogenic action to the immature granule cells of the hippocampus provides the possibility for design of selective targeting approaches. In this regard, it will be advantageous to understand more aspects of JNK action in adult born granule cells from in vivo study. While much remains to be understood, we can say that JNK has entered the arena as a kinase that controls anxiety and depressive behaviour in mice, and may contribute to maladaptive changes underlying affective disorders.

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the EU-funded Marie Curie r’BIRTH ITN # 608346 and by the Academy of Finland project #310583. We are grateful to the members of the Coffey lab and the rBIRTH consortium for their views and opinions that guided our work on depression and neurogenesis during the course of this network.

References

Whiteford

Ferrari

Degenhardt

Feigin

Vos

. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: An analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116820.

Covington

Vialou

Nestler

. From synapse to nucleus: Novel targets for treating depression. Neuropharmacology. 2010;58(4-5):683–93.

Wainwright

Galea

. The neural plasticity theory of depression: Assessing the roles of adult neurogenesis and PSA-NCAM within the hippocampus. Neural Plast. 2013:805497.

Varidaki

Mohammad

Coffey

. Molecular mechanisms of depression. 1st ed. Frodl T, editor: Elsevier; 2016.

Malberg

Eisch

Nestler

Duman

. Chronic antidepressant treatment increases neurogenesis in adult rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2000;20(24):9104–10.

Santarelli

Saxe

Gross

Surget

Battaglia

Dulawa

, et al. Requirement of hippocampal neurogenesis for the behavioral effects of antidepressants. Science. 2003;301(5634)805–9.

David

Samuels

Rainer

Wang

Marsteller

Mendez

, et al. Neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of fluoxetine in an animal model of anxiety/depression. Neuron. 2009;62(4):479–93.

Surget

Tanti

Leonardo

Laugeray

Rainer

Touma

, et al. Antidepressants recruit new neurons to improve stress response regulation. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16(12):1177–88.

Schloesser

Orvoen

Jimenez

Hardy

Maynard

Sukumar

, et al. Antidepressant-like effects of electroconvulsive seizures require adult neurogenesis in a neuroendocrine model of depression. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(5):862–7.

10.

Bessa

Ferreira

Melo

Marques

Cerqueira

Palha

, et al. The mood-improving actions of antidepressants do not depend on neurogenesis but are associated with neuronal remodeling. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14(8):764–73, 39.

11.

Marlatt

Lucassen

van Praag

. Comparison of neurogenic effects of fluoxetine, duloxetine and running in mice. Brain Res. 2010;1341:93–9.

12.

Mohammad

Marchisella

Ortega-Martinez

Hollos

Eerola

Komulainen

, et al. JNK1 controls adult hippocampal neurogenesis and imposes cell-autonomous control of anxiety behaviour from the neurogenic niche. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(2):362–74.

13.

Altman

Das

. Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J Comp Neurol. 1965;124(3):319–35.

14.

Spalding

Bergmann

Alkass

Bernard

Salehpour

Huttner

, et al. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell. 2013;153(6):1219–27.

15.

Kempermann

. New neurons for ‘survival of the fittest’. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):727–36.

16.

Cameron

McKay

. Adult neurogenesis produces a large pool of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol. 2001;435(4):406–17.

17.

Kempermann

Kuhn

Gage

. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997;386(6624):493–5.

18.

Bergmann

Spalding

Frisén

. Adult neurogenesis in humans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(7):e018994.

19.

Kheirbek

Drew

Burghardt

Costantini

Tannenholz

Ahmari

, et al. Differential control of learning and anxiety along the dorsoventral axis of the dentate gyrus. Neuron. 2013;77(5):955–68.

20.

Yau

. Involvement of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in learning and forgetting. Neural Plast. 2015)717958.

21.

Revest

Dupret

Koehl

Funk-Reiter

Grosjean

Piazza

, et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in anxiety-related behaviors. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14(10):959–67.

22.

Snyder

Glover

Sanzone

Kamhi

Cameron

. The effects of exercise and stress on the survival and maturation of adult-generated granule cells. Hippocampus. 2009;19(10):898–906.

23.

Hen

. Functional dissociation of adult-born neurons along the dorsoventral axis of the dentate gyrus. Hippocampus. 2014;24(7):751–61.

24.

van Praag

Christie

Sejnowski

Gage

. Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(23):13427–31.

25.

Trejo

Llorens-Martín

Torres-Alemán

. The effects of exercise on spatial learning and anxiety-like behavior are mediated by an IGF-I-dependent mechanism related to hippocampal neurogenesis. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008;37(2):402–11.

26.

Sahay

Scobie

Hill

O’Carroll

Kheirbek

Burghardt

, et al. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature. 2011;472(7344):466–70.

27.

Vivar

van Praag

. Running changes the brain: The long and the short of it. Physiology (Bethesda). 2017;32(6):410–24.

28.

Soumier

Carter

Schoenfeld

Cameron

. New hippocampal neurons mature rapidly in response to ketamine but are not required for its acute antidepressant effects on neophagia in rats. eNeuro. 2016;3(2).

29.

Costello

Pine

Hammen

March

Plotsky

Weissman

, et al. Development and natural history of mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52(6):529–42.

30.

MacMillan

Szeszko

Moore

Madden

Lorch

Ivey

, et al. Increased amygdala: Hippocampal volume ratios associated with severity of anxiety in pediatric major depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2003;13(1):65–73.

31.

Schmaal

Veltman

van Erp

Sämann

Frodl

Jahanshad

, et al. Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):806–12.

32.

Stockmeier

Mahajan

Konick

Overholser

Jurjus

Meltzer

, et al. Cellular changes in the postmortem hippocampus in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;56, 640–50.

33.

Hercher

Turecki

Mechawar

. Through the looking glass: Examining neuroanatomical evidence for cellular alterations in major depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2009;43(11):947–61.

34.

Soetanto

Wilson

Talbot

Schneider

Sobiesk

, et al. Association of anxiety and depression with microtubule-associated protein 2- and synaptopodin-immunolabeled dendrite and spine densities in hippocampal CA3 of older humans. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67, 448–57.

35.

Musazzi

Tornese

Sala

Popoli

. Acute or chronic? A stressful question. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40(9):525–35.

36.

Boldrini

Underwood

Hen

Rosoklija

Dwork

John Mann

, et al. Antidepressants increase neural progenitor cells in the human hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34(11):2376–89.

37.

Boldrini

Santiago

Hen

Dwork

Rosoklija

Tamir

, et al. Hippocampal granule neuron number and dentate gyrus volume in antidepressant-treated and untreated major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(6):1068–77.

38.

Kjelstrup

Tuvnes

Steffenach

Murison

Moser

. Reduced fear expression after lesions of the ventral hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(16):10825–30.

39.

Bannerman

Deacon

Offen

Friswell

Grubb

Rawlins

. Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: Spatial memory and hyponeophagia. Behav Neurosci. 2002;116(5):884–901.

40.

Bannerman

Rawlins

McHugh

Deacon

Yee

Bast

, et al. Regional dissociations within the hippocampus–memory and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(3):273–83.

41.

Strange

Witter

Lein

Moser

. Functional organization of the hippocampal longitudinal axis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(10):655–69.

42.

Anacker

Hen

. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive flexibility - linking memory and mood. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(6):335–46.

43.

Eichenbaum

. Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions in episodic memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(9):547–58.

44.

Nestler

Barrot

DiLeone

Eisch

Gold

Monteggia

. Neurobiology of depression. Neuron. 2002;34, 13–25.

45.

Deisseroth

. Circuit dynamics of adaptive and maladaptive behaviour. Nature. 2014;505(7483):309–17.

46.

Besnard

Sahay

. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis, fear generalization, and stress. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(1):24–44.

47.

Padilla-Coreano

Bolkan

Pierce

Blackman

Hardin

Garcia-Garcia

, et al. Direct ventral hippocampal-prefrontal input is required for anxiety-related neural activity and behavior. Neuron. 2016;89(4):857–66.

48.

Sousa

Almeida

. Disconnection and reconnection: The morphological basis of (mal)adaptation to stress. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(12):742–51.

49.

Kyriakis

Avruch

. Mammalian MAPK signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation: A 10-year update. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(2):689–737.

50.

Karin

Gallagher

. From JNK to pay dirt: Jun kinases, their biochemistry, physiology and clinical importance. IUBMB Life. 2005;57(4-5):283–95.

51.

Weston

Davis

. The JNK signal transduction pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19(2):142–9.

52.

Kuan

Yang

Samanta Roy

Davis

Rakic

Flavell

. The Jnk1 and Jnk2 protein kinases are required for regional specific apoptosis during early brain development. Neuron. 1999;22(4):667–76.

53.

Manning

Davis

. Targeting JNK for therapeutic benefit: From junk to gold?Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(7):554–65.

54.

Sabio

Cavanagh-Kyros

Barrett

Jung

Ong

, et al. Role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis in metabolic regulation by JNK1. Genes Dev. 2010;24(3):256–64.

55.

Coffey

. Nuclear and cytosolic JNK signalling in neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(5):285–99.

56.

Coffey

Hongisto

Dickens

Davis

Courtney

. Dual roles for c-Jun N-terminal kinase in developmental and stress responses in cerebellar granule neurons. J Neurosci. 2000;20(20):7602–13.

57.

Coffey

Smiciene

Hongisto

Cao

Brecht

Herdegen

, et al. c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) 2/3 is specifically activated by stress, mediating c-Jun activation, in the presence of constitutive JNK1 activity in cerebellar neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22(11):4335–45.

58.

Björkblom

Vainio

Hongisto

Herdegen

Courtney

Coffey

. All JNKs can kill, but nuclear localization is critical for neuronal death. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(28):19704–13.

59.

Das

Reilly

Davis

. JNK regulates FoxO-dependent autophagy in neurons. Genes Dev. 2011;25(4):310–22.

60.

Manassero

Repetto

Cobianchi

Valsecchi

Bonny

Rossi

, et al. Role of JNK isoforms in the development of neuropathic pain following sciatic nerve transection in the mouse. Mol Pain. 2012;8, 39.

61.

Borsello

Bonny

. Use of cell-permeable peptides to prevent neuronal degeneration. Trends Mol Med. 2004;10(5):239–44.

62.

Michel-Monigadon

Bonny

Hirt

. c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway inhibition in intracerebral hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29(6):564–70.

63.

Vernia

Cavanagh-Kyros

Barrett

Jung

Kim

Davis

. Diet-induced obesity mediated by the JNK/DIO2 signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev. 2013;27(21):2345–55.

64.

Solinas

Becattini

. JNK at the crossroad of obesity, insulin resistance, and cell stress response. Mol Metab. 2017;6(2):174–84.

65.

Yun

Reynolds

Masiulis

Eisch

. Re-evaluating the link between neuropsychiatric disorders and dysregulated adult neurogenesis. Nat Med. 2016;22(11):1239–47.

66.

Dickens

Rogers

Cavanagh

Raitano

Xia

Halpern

, et al. A cytoplasmic inhibitor of the JNK signal transduction pathway. Science. 1997;277(5326:693–6.

67.

Frankel

Pabo

. Cellular uptake of the tat protein from human immunodeficiency virus. Cell. 1988;55(6):1189–93.

68.

Kristensen

Nielsen

. Cell-penetrating peptides as tools to enhance non-injectable delivery of biopharmaceuticals. Tissue Barriers. 2016;4(2):e1178369.

69.

Bonny

Oberson

Negri

Sauser

Schorderet

. Cell-permeable peptide inhibitors of JNK: Novel blockers of beta-cell death. Diabetes. 2001;50(1):77–82.

70.

Barr

Kendrick

Bogoyevitch

. Identification of the critical features of a small peptide inhibitor of JNK activity. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(13):10987–97.

71.

Björkblom

Ostman

Hongisto

Komarovski

Filén

Nyman

, et al. Constitutively active cytoplasmic c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 is a dominant regulator of dendritic architecture: Role of microtubule-associated protein 2 as an effector. J Neurosci. 2005;25(27):6350–61.

72.

Komulainen

Zdrojewska

Freemantle

Mohammad

Kulesskaya

Deshpande

, et al. JNK1 controls dendritic field size in L2/3 and L5 of the motor cortex, constrains soma size, and influences fine motor coordination. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8, 272.

73.

Marín-Burgin

Mongiat

Pardi

Schinder

. Unique processing during a period of high excitation/inhibition balance in adult-born neurons. Science. 2012;335(6073):1238–42.

74.

Drew

Kheirbek

Luna

Denny

Cloidt

, et al. Activation of local inhibitory circuits in the dentate gyrus by adult-born neurons. Hippocampus. 2016;26(6):763–78.

75.

Ikrar

Guo

Besnard

Levinson

Hill

, et al. Adult neurogenesis modifies excitability of the dentate gyrus. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7, 204.

76.

Lacefield

Itskov

Reardon

Hen

Gordon

. Effects of adult-generated granule cells on coordinated network activity in the dentate gyrus. Hippocampus. 2012;22(1):106–16.

77.

Jin

Maren

. Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions in memory and emotion. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9, 170.

78.

Richardson

Strange

Dolan

. Encoding of emotional memories depends on amygdala and hippocampus and their interactions. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(3):278–85.

79.

Britt

Benaliouad

McDevitt

Stuber

Wise

Bonci

. Synaptic and behavioral profile of multiple glutamatergic inputs to the nucleus accumbens. Neuron. 2012;76(4):790–803.

80.

Wolff

Alcaraz

Marchand

Coutureau

. Functional heterogeneity of the limbic thalamus: From hippocampal to cortical functions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;54, 120–30.

81.

Bagot

Parise

Peña

Zhang

Maze

Chaudhury

, et al. Ventral hippocampal afferents to the nucleus accumbens regulate susceptibility to depression. Nat Commun. 2015;6, 7062.

82.

Toni

Schinder

. Maturation and functional integration of new granule cells into the adult hippocampus. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;8(1):a018903.

83.

Goh

Sailor

Kitabatake

Ming

Song

. GABA regulates synaptic integration of newly generated neurons in the adult brain. Nature. 2006;439(7076):589–93.

84.

Karten

Jones

Jeurling

Cameron

. GABAergic signaling in young granule cells in the adult rat and mouse dentate gyrus. Hippocampus. 2006;16(3):312–20.

85.

Klein

Lamitina

O’Neill

. JNK is a volume-sensitive kinase that phosphorylates the Na-K-2Cl cotransporter in vitro. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(3 Pt 1):C425–31.

86.

Yang

Hsu

Ming

Song

. A critical period for enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated neurons of the adult brain. Neuron. 2007;54(4):559–66.

87.

Zheng

Chen

Zhang

Cai

Liu

Zhao

, et al. Acute cold exposure and rewarming enhanced spatial memory and activated the MAPK cascades in the rat brain. Brain Res. 2008;1239:171–80.

88.

Adzic

Djordjevic

Niciforovic

Demonacos

Radojcic

, et al. Acute or chronic stress induce cell compartment-specific phosphorylation of glucocorticoid receptor and alter its transcriptional activity in Wistar rat brain. J Endocrinol. 2009;202(1):87–97.

89.

Espinosa-Oliva

de Pablos

Villarán

Argüelles

Venero

Machado

, et al. Stress is critical for LPS-induced activation of microglia and damage in the rat hippocampus. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(1):85–102.

90.

Rosa

Pesarico

Nogueira

. m-Trifluoromethyl-diphenyl diselenide promotes resilience to social avoidance induced by social defeat stress in mice: Contribution of opioid receptors and MAPKs. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017.

91.

Galeotti

Ghelardini

. Regionally selective activation and differential regulation of ERK, JNK and p38 MAP kinase signalling pathway by protein kinase C in mood modulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;15(6):781–93.

92.

Filipović

Zlatković

Pavićević

Mandić

Demajo

. Chronic isolation stress compromises JNK/c-Jun signaling in rat brain. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2012;119(11):1275–84.

93.

Solas

Gerenu

Gil-Bea

Ramírez

. Mineralocorticoid receptor activation induces insulin resistance through c-Jun N-terminal kinases in response to chronic corticosterone: Cognitive implications. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013;25(4):350–6.

94.

Krishnan

Nestler

. Animal models of depression: Molecular perspectives. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2011;7, 121–47.

95.

Binder

Künzel

Nickel

Kern

Pfennig

Majer

, et al. HPA-axis regulation at in-patient admission is associated with antidepressant therapy outcome in male but not in female depressed patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34(1):99–109.

96.

Wilson

Koenig

. Social interaction and social withdrawal in rodents as readouts for investigating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24(5):759–73.

97.

Lohoff

. Overview of the genetics of major depressive disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12(6):539–46.

98.

Severinsen

Bjarkam

Kiaer-Larsen

Olsen

Nielsen

Blechingberg

, et al. Evidence implicating BRD1 with brain development and susceptibility to both schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11(12):1126–38.

99.

Group PGCBDW. Large-scale genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):977–83.

100.

Mullins

Lewis

. Genetics of depression: Progress at last. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(8):43.

101.

Wei

Sinha

Levine

. Dual role of JNK1-mediated phosphorylation of Bcl-2 in autophagy and apoptosis regulation. Autophagy. 2008;4(7):949–51.

102.

Zhang

Chen

Yang

Shan

Zhu

, et al. The TAK1-JNK cascade is required for IRF3 function in the innate immune response. Cell Res. 2009;19(4):412–28.

103.

Gehringer

Muth

Koch

Laufer

. c-Jun N-terminal kinase inhibitors: A patent review (2010 - 2014). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2015;25(8):849–72.

104.

Messoussi

Feneyrolles

Bros

Deroide

Daydé-Cazals

Chevé

, et al. Recent progress in the design, study, and development of c-Jun N-terminal kinase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Chem Biol. 2014;21(11):1433–43.

105.

Deloche

Lopez-Lazaro

Mouz

Perino

Abadie

Combette

. XG-102 administered to healthy male volunteers as a single intravenous infusion: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2014;2(1):e00020.

106.

Chiquet

Aptel

Creuzot-Garcher

Berrod

Kodjikian

Massin

, et al. Postoperative ocular inflammation: A single subconjunctival injection of XG-102 compared to dexamethasone drops in a randomized trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;174, 76–84.

107.

Tararuk

Ostman

Björkblom

Padzik

Zdrojewska

, et al. JNK1 phosphorylation of SCG10 determines microtubule dynamics and axodendritic length. J Cell Biol. 2006;173(2):265–77.

JNK Regulation of Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

Keywords

ADULT HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS AND DEPRESSION

ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION – THE HIPPOCAMPAL CONNECTION

c-JUN N-TERMINAL KINASES (JNKs)

JNK1 REGULATES ANXIETY AND DEPRESSIVE-LIKE BEHAVIOUR IN MICE

JNK1 ACTIVITY IN NEWBORN GRANULE CELLS OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS INDUCES ANXIOGENIC AND DEPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR

THE DJNKI-1 INHIBITOR OF JNK

HOW COULD JNK INHIBITION IN GRANULE CELLS ALTER BEHAVIOUR?

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT JNK REGULATION IN ANIMAL MODELS OF DEPRESSION?

TARGETING JNK FOR DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY?

CONCLUSIONS

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

References