Musculoskeletal conditions are the leading cause of disability, requiring continuous outcome measurement, including the utilization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
OBJECTIVE:
The aims of the study were a) to characterize the use PROMs by Portuguese physiotherapists in patients with musculoskeletal conditions; b) to analyze the associated factors of their use and; c) to identify the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.
METHODS:
A cross-sectional online survey was carried out with musculoskeletal physiotherapists working in Portugal. Closed questions were used to describe the use of PROMs. The factors associated with the non-use of PROMs were analysed through logistic regression models ( 0.05). Barriers and facilitators were assessed through open questions and analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS:
One hundred and fifty-six physiotherapists answered the online survey. Most physiotherapists do not use outcome measures consistently and physical tests are often chosen (70.5%) over PROMs (17.3%). The work sector ( 0.01; 0.015; 0.009). the workplace stimulus ( 0.001) and the physiotherapists’ knowledge about PROMs ( 0.017) were identified as factors associated with the non-use of PROMs. Barriers and facilitators to the use of PROMs are related to physiotherapists’ skills, the patients’ characteristics, the workplace conditions, and the instruments’ characteristics.
CONCLUSION:
This study showed the poor use of PROMs by musculoskeletal physiotherapists and identified the associated factors, barriers, and facilitators that should be considered to increase its future use by musculoskeletal physiotherapists in Portugal.
BriggsAWoolfADreinhöferKHombNHoyDKopansky-GilesD, et al. Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2018; (96): 366-8.
2.
SebbagEFeltenRSagezFSibiliaJDevilliersHArnaudL. The world-wide burden of musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic analysis of the World Health Organization Burden of Diseases Database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78(6): 844-8.
3.
BrancoJCRodriguesAMGouveiaNEusébioMRamiroSMachadoPM, et al. Prevalence of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and their impact on health-related quality of life, physical function and mental health in Portugal: results from EpiReumaPt – a national health survey. Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. 2016; (2).
4.
AzevedoLCosta-PereiraAMendonçaLDiasCCastro-LopesJ. The economic impact of chronic pain: a nationwide population-based cost-of-illness study in Portugal. The European Journal of Health Economics. 2014; 17: 87-98.
5.
FosterNEHartvigsenJCroftPR. Taking responsibility for the early assessment and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal pain: a review and critical analysis. Arthritis Reearch and Therapy. 2012; 14(205): 1-9.
6.
LinIWilesLWallerRGouckeRNagreeYGibberdM, et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54: 79-86.
7.
AbramsDDavidsonMHarrickJHarcourtPZylinskiMClancyJ. Monitoring the change: Current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2006; 11: 46-53.
8.
BraunTRieckmannAWeberFGrünebergC. Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: A cross-sectional online survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1): 1-16.
9.
KällILarssonMEHBernhardssonS. Use of outcome measures improved after a tailored implementation in primary care physiotherapy: a prospective, controlled study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016; 22(5): 668-76.
10.
DaviesCNitzAJMattacolaCGKitzmanPHowellDVieleK, et al. Practice patterns when treating patients with low back pain: A survey of physical therapists. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014; 30(6): 399-408.
11.
KyteDGCalvertMvan der WeesPJten HoveRTolanSHillJC. An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy (United Kingdom). 2015; 101(2): 119-25.
12.
ÖstholsSBoströmCRasmussen-BarrE. Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain–a survey among primary health care physiotherapists. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 41(20): 2459-67.
13.
SwinkelsRAHMVan PeppenRPSWittinkHCustersJWHBeurskensAJHM. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12(1): 1-15.
14.
KamperSJ. Fundamentals of measurement: Linking evidence to practice. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2019; 49(2): 114-5.
15.
JetteDUHalbertJIversonCMiceliEShahP. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: Perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009; 89(2): 125-35.
16.
MeerhoffGAvan DulmenSACruijsbergJKNijhuis-Van der SandenMWGVan der WeesPJ. Which factors influence the use of patient-reported outcome measures in dutch physiotherapy practice: A cross-sectional study. Physiotherapy Canada. 2019; 72(1): 63-70.
17.
Al-MuqirenTNAl-EisaESAlghadirAHAnwerS. Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: Barriers, facilitators and perceptions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1): 1-10.
18.
SwinkelsRAHMMeerhoffGMCustersJWHvan PeppenRPSBeurskensAJHMWittinkH. Using outcome measures in daily practice: Development and evaluation of an implementation strategy for physiotherapists in the Netherlands. Physiotherapy Canada. 2015; 67(4): 357-64.
19.
EysenbachGStreetE. Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) Corresponding Author? Related Article? J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6: 1-6.
20.
BrinkmanMBartenDJPistersMVerheijR. Current use of PROMs and factors associated with their use in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Learn Health Syst. 2019; 3(4): 1-9.
21.
FerreiraLVitalEJorgeP. Caraterização da Atividade Profissional dos Fisioterapeutas. 2018.
22.
CopelandJMTaylorWJDeanSG. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: A survey of new zealand physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2008; 88(12): 1492-505.
23.
El-sobkeySBHelmyAM. Evidence-based practice and standardized outcome measures: Egyptian physical therapists’ beliefs, perceptions and adoption. World Appl Sci J. 2012; 16(9): 1282-91.
24.
BolarinwaOA. Principles and Methods of Validity and Reliability Testing of Questionnaires Used in Social and Health Science Researches. 2015; 195-201.
25.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psicology. 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
26.
KampstraNAZipfelNVan Der NatPBWestertGPVan Der WeesPJGroenewoudAS. Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1): 1-14.
27.
M’KumbuziVEalesCStewartA. An analysis of the completion of physiotherapy clinical records in Gauteng Province. South African Journal of Physiotherapy. 2002; 58(1): 18-27.
28.
PhillipsAStillerKWilliamsM. Medical record documentation: The quality of physiotherapy entries. International Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2006; 4(3): 1-17.
29.
RichozCAyerABerchtoldARichozS. Record keeping by Swiss physiotherapists: A national survey of knowledge regarding legal requirements. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 141(October): 1-10.
30.
ÖstholsSBoströmCEvaRB. Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 8288(May): 1-9.
31.
CowellIO’SullivanPO’SullivanKPoytonRMcGregorAMurtaghG. Perceptions of physiotherapists towards the management of non-specific chronic low back pain from a biopsychosocial perspective: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018; 38: 113-9.
32.
MacdermidJCWaltonDMCôtéPSantaguidaPLGrossACarlessoL. Use of outcome measures in managing neck pain: An international multidisciplinary survey. The Open Orthopaedicas Journal. 2013; 7: 506-20.
33.
GardnerTRefshaugeKMcAuleyJGoodallSHübscherMSmithL. Patient led goal setting in chronic low back pain-What goals are important to the patient and are they aligned to what we measure? Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 98(8): 1035-8.
34.
HushJMRefshaugeKSullivanGDe SouzaLMaherCGMcAuleyJH. Recovery: What does this mean to patients with low back pain? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2009; 61(1): 124-31.
35.
BuchbinderRBatterhamRElsworthGDionneCEIrvinEOsborneRH. A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: Development of a conceptual and measurement model. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13(5).
36.
MainCJFosterNBuchbinderR. How important are back pain beliefs and expectations for satisfactory recovery from back pain? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(2): 205-17.
37.
DeshpandePSudeepthiBlRajanSAbdul NazirC. Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2011; 2(4): 137.
38.
OlsenNRBradleyPLomborgKNortvedtMW. Evidence based practice in clinical physiotherapy education: A qualitative interpretive description. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13(1).
39.
AlreniASEMcRobertCMcLeanSM. Utilisation of outcome measures in the management of non-specific neck pain: A national survey of current physiotherapy practice in the UK. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021; 52(February): 102347.
40.
ÖstholsSBoströmCEvaRB. Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 8288(May): 1-9.
41.
RivardLMRussellDJRoxboroughLKetelaarMBartlettDJRosenbaumP. Promoting the use of measurement tools in practice: A mixed-methods study of the activities and experiences of physical therapist knowledge brokers. Phys Ther. 2010; 90(11): 1580-90.
