Vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) commonly result from low bone mass and microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue. spinal orthoses are common non-pharmacological options for managing vertebral fracture pain. However, the effects of spinal orthoses on pain, physical functioning, and quality of life (QoL) are still debated.
OBJECTIVE:
This survey aimed to investigate the patients-reported outcomes of a dynamic spinal orthosis prescribed in the routine clinical practice of VFFs management.
METHODS:
This multi-center national-wide prospective cohort study assessed older patients (aged 60 years) diagnosed with acute VFFs and prescribed with a dynamic spinal orthosis (Spinfast®). A survey questionnaire was realized and included sections on patient characterization, osteoporosis characterization, spinal orthosis, clinical outcomes, pain medications, and osteoporosis medications. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and after three months. A total of 68 patients completed the questionnaire at three months. Most patients had one or two VFFs and were treated with pain medications and osteoporosis medications. Compliance and tolerability of the spinal orthosis were assessed, and clinical outcomes such as pain intensity, physical functioning, and QoL were measured.
RESULTS:
The results showed no significant differences in outcomes between age subgroups. Italian physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians were commonly involved in the management of VFFs patients. Sixty-six patients completed the questionnaire. The results showed that pain intensity, physical functioning and QoL improved after three months of spinal orthosis wearing ( 0.0001).
CONCLUSION:
The correct management of VFFs is mandatory to improve pain and reduce disability, and our findings suggested a positive role of dynamic spinal orthosis to improve the comprehensive management of VFFs patients. However, high-quality research trials are warranted to provide clear recommendations for the correct clinical management of VFF.
CrimminsEM. Lifespan and healthspan: past, present, and promise. The Gerontologist.2015; 55(6): 901-11.
2.
KlenkJKeilUJaenschAChristiansenMCNagelG. Changes in life expectancy 1950–2010: contributions from age-and disease-specific mortality in selected countries. Population Health Metrics.2016; 14(1): 1-11.
3.
CollPPPhuSHajjarSHKirkBDuqueGTaxelP. The prevention of osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.2021; 69(5): 1388-98.
4.
PiazzollaABizzocaDSolarinoGMorettiLMorettiB. Vertebral fragility fractures: clinical and radiological results of augmentation and fixation – a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2020; 32: 1219-32.
5.
FerreiraMLMarchL. Vertebral fragility fractures – How to treat them? Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology.2019; 33(2): 227-35.
6.
MitchellRJewellPJavaidMMcKeanDOstlereS. Reporting of vertebral fragility fractures: can radiologists help reduce the number of hip fractures? Archives of Osteoporosis.2017; 12: 1-6.
7.
WilliamsALAl-BusaidiASparrowPJAdamsJEWhitehouseRW. Under-reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on computed tomography. European Journal of Radiology.2009; 69(1): 179-83.
8.
de SireAAmmendoliaAGimiglianoATiberiRCisariCInvernizziM, editors. Spinal orthoses prescription for vertebral fragility fractures by italian physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians: The SPIN-VER survey. Healthcare; 2021; MDP.
9.
ScaturroDLauricellaLTumminelliLGTomaselloSMauroGL. Is there a relationship between mild-moderate back pain and fragility fractures? Original investigation, 2020.
10.
VeroneseNKolkHMaggiS. Epidemiology of fragility fractures and social impact. Orthogeriatrics: The Management of Older Patients with Fragility Fractures.2021; 19-34.
11.
ZhuJMarchL. Treating osteoporosis: risks and management. Australian Prescriber.2022; 45(5).
12.
MigliaccioSFrancomanoDRomagnoliEMaroccoCFornariRResminiG, et al. Persistence with denosumab therapy in women affected by osteoporosis with fragility fractures: a multicenter observational real practice study in Italy. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.2017; 40: 1321-6.
13.
FerrilloMMigliarioMRoccuzzoAMolinero-MourellePFalcicchioGUmanoGR, et al. Periodontal Disease and Vitamin D Deficiency in Pregnant Women: Which Correlation with Preterm and Low-Weight Birth? Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(19).
14.
IolasconGMorettiAde SireACalafioreDGimiglianoF. Effectiveness of Calcifediol in Improving Muscle Function in Post-Menopausal Women: A Prospective Cohort Study. Adv Ther.2017; 34(3): 744-52.
15.
KropsLABoumaAJVan NassauFNautaJvan den Akker-ScheekIBossersWJ, et al. Implementing individually tailored prescription of physical activity in routine clinical care: protocol of the physicians implement exercise = medicine (PIE = M) development and implementation project. JMIR Research Protocols.2020; 9(11): e19397.
16.
AmanJEElangovanNYehI-LKonczakJ. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review. Frontiers in human neuroscience.2015; 8: 1075.
17.
de SireAInvernizziMBaricichALippiLAmmendoliaAGrassiFA, et al. Optimization of transdisciplinary management of elderly with femur proximal extremity fracture: A patient-tailored plan from orthopaedics to rehabilitation. World journal of orthopedics.2021; 12(7): 456.
18.
ScaturroDVitaglianiFTerranaPTomaselloSCamardaLLetizia MauroG. Does the association of therapeutic exercise and supplementation with sucrosomial magnesium improve posture and balance and prevent the risk of new falls? Aging clinical and Experimental Research.2022; 1-9.
19.
LippiLUbertiFFolliATurcoACurciCd’AbroscaF, et al. Impact of nutraceuticals and dietary supplements on mitochondria modifications in healthy aging: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Aging Clin Exp Res.2022; 34(11): 2659-74.
20.
NewmanMLoweCMBarkerK. Spinal orthoses for vertebral osteoporosis and osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2016; 97(6): 1013-25.
21.
SitYL. Posture training bracewear for older adults with degenerative scoliosis (ADS). 2021.
22.
FerlincAFabianiEVelnarTGradisnikL. The importance and role of proprioception in the elderly: a short review. Materia Socio-Medica.2019; 31(3): 219.
23.
SinakiM. Exercise for patients with osteoporosis: management of vertebral compression fractures and trunk strengthening for fall prevention. PM&R.2012; 4(11): 882-8.
24.
MeccarielloLMuziiVFFalzaranoGMediciACartaSFortinaM, et al. Dynamic corset versus three-point brace in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a prospective, comparative study. Aging clinical and experimental research.2017; 29: 443-9.
25.
ChenJ-HLiuCYouLSimmonsCA. Boning up on Wolff’s Law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone. Journal of Biomechanics.2010; 43(1): 108-18.
26.
ShariatzadehHModagheghBSMirzaeiA. The effect of dynamic hyperextension brace on osteoporosis and hyperkyphosis reduction in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery.2017; 5(3): 181.
27.
PfeiferMKohlweyLBegerowBMinneHW. Effects of two newly developed spinal orthoses on trunk muscle strength, posture, and quality-of-life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2011; 90(10): 805-15.
28.
RzewuskaMFerreiraMMcLachlanAJMachadoGCMaherCG. The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis. European Spine Journal.2015; 24: 702-14.
29.
LiMLawS-WChengJKeeH-MWongMS. A comparison study on the efficacy of SpinoMed® and soft lumbar orthosis for osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Prosthetics and orthotics international.2015; 39(4): 270-6.
30.
AzadiniaFKamyabMBehtashHMaroufiNLarijaniB. The effects of two spinal orthoses on balance in elderly people with thoracic kyphosis. Prosthetics and orthotics international.2013; 37(5): 404-10.
31.
Von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGøtzschePCVandenbrouckeJP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery.2014; 12(12): 1495-9.
32.
AssociationWM. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama.2013; 310(20): 2191-4.
33.
OrganizationWH. Decade of healthy ageing 2020–2030. Update. 2020; 5.
34.
GenantHKWuCYvan KuijkCNevittMC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res.1993; 8(9): 1137-48.
35.
LangleyGSheppeardH. The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatology International.1985; 5(4): 145-8.
36.
KurlowiczLWallaceM. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE). SLACK Incorporated Thorofare, NJ; 1999; p. 8-9.
37.
EysenbachG. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Gunther Eysenbach Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada 2004; p. e34.
38.
HettchenMWillertSvon StengelSKohlMKemmlerW. Effects of the “Spinomed active” orthosis on chronic back pain in kyphotic women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures three months and older: A randomized controlled study. Front Pain Res (Lausanne).2022; 3: 1038269.
39.
PierohPSpieglUJAVölkerAMärdianSvon der HöhNHOsterhoffG, et al. Spinal Orthoses in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review With Quantitative Quality Assessment. Global Spine J.2023; 13(1_suppl): 59s-72s.
40.
UrquhartJCAlrehailiOAFisherCGFlemingARasoulinejadPGurrK, et al. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis. J Neurosurg Spine.2017; 27(1): 42-7.
41.
KoeléMLemsWWillemsH. The clinical relevance of hyperkyphosis: a narrative review. Frontiers in Endocrinology.2020; 11: 5.
42.
StirrattMJDunbar-JacobJCraneHMSimoniJMCzajkowskiSHilliardME, et al. Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use. Translational Behavioral Medicine.2015; 5(4): 470-82.
43.
GarfieldSCliffordSEliassonLBarberNWillsonA. Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology.2011; 11(1): 149.
44.
GuralnikJMFerrucciLPieperCFLeveilleSGMarkidesKSOstirGV, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.2000; 55(4): M221-31.
45.
EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990; 16(3): 199-208.
46.
KotrlikJHigginsC. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal.2001; 19(1): 43.
47.
LangellaFBalestrinoADamilanoMCecchinatoRBiberZPaolettaM, et al. The aging spine: the effect of vertebral fragility fracture on sagittal alignment. Archives of Osteoporosis.2021; 16: 1-8.
48.
GrimmerKWilliamsM. Gender-age environmental associates of adolescent low back pain. Applied Ergonomics.2000; 31(4): 343-60.
49.
KimH-JYiJ-MChoH-GChangB-SLeeC-KKimJH, et al. Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. JBJS.2014; 96(23): 1959-66.
50.
AlexandruDSoW. Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures. The Permanente Journal.2012; 16(4): 46.
51.
LeeJSHobdenEStiellIGWellsGA. Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med.2003; 10(10): 1128-30.
52.
LeeY-HKangS-M. Effect of belt pressure and breath held on trunk electromyography. Spine.2002; 27(3): 282-90.
53.
RostamiMNoormohammadpourPSadeghianAHMansourniaMAKordiR. The effect of lumbar support on the ultrasound measurements of trunk muscles: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. PM&R.2014; 6(4): 302-8.
54.
FurrerPRHodelSWanivenhausFGrubhoferFFarshadM. Compliance with wearing a thoracolumbar orthosis in nonoperative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective sensor-controlled study. The Spine Journal.2023; 23(3): 433-9.
55.
KwehBTSLeeHQTanTRutgesJMarionTTewKS, et al. The role of spinal orthoses in osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the elderly population (age 60 years or older): systematic review. Global Spine Journal.2021; 11(6): 975-87.
56.
DionyssiotisYTrovasGThomaSLyritisGPapaioannouN. Prospective study of spinal orthoses in women. Prosthetics and Orthotics International.2015; 39(6): 487-95.
57.
KawchukGNEdgecombeTLWongAYLCojocaruAPrasadN. A non-randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of nonrigid, inelastic corsets on spine function in low back pain participants and asymptomatic controls. The Spine Journal.2015; 15(10): 2222-7.
58.
JinYZLeeJH. Effect of brace to osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a meta-analysis. Journal of Korean medical science.2016; 31(10): 1641-9.
59.
MakSKDAccotoD, editors. Review of current spinal robotic orthoses. Healthcare.2021; MDPI.
60.
EnsrudKESchousboeJT. Vertebral fractures. New England Journal of Medicine.2011; 364(17): 1634-42.
61.
JangH-DKimE-HLeeJCChoiS-WKimHSChaJ-S, et al. Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022. Asian Spine Journal.2022; 16(6): 934-46.
62.
HarveyNCBiverEKaufmanJ-MBauerJBrancoJBrandiML, et al. The role of calcium supplementation in healthy musculoskeletal ageing: An expert consensus meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Foundation for Osteoporosis (IOF). Osteoporosis International.2017; 28: 447-62.
63.
IolasconGMorettiAde SireACalafioreDGimiglianoF. Effectiveness of calcifediol in improving muscle function in post-menopausal women: a prospective cohort study. Advances in Therapy.2017; 34: 744-52.
64.
de SireAde SireRCurciCCastiglioneFWahliW. Role of Dietary Supplements and Probiotics in Modulating Microbiota and Bone Health: The Gut-Bone Axis. Cells.2022; 11(4).
65.
GibbsJCMacIntyreNJPonzanoMTempletonJAThabaneLPapaioannouA, et al. Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2019 (7).
66.
MageeCDByarsLADeZeeKJ. Limitations of subgroup analyses in meta-analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS duration. Archives of Internal Medicine.2012; 172(4): 375; author reply-6.
67.
DijkmanBKooistraBBhandariM. How to work with a subgroup analysis. Can J Surg.2009; 52(6): 515-22.
68.
SunXIoannidisJPAgoritsasTAlbaACGuyattG. How to use a subgroup analysis: users’ guide to the medical literature. Jama.2014; 311(4): 405-11.
69.
RothwellPM. Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet.2005; 365(9454): 176-86.
