Differences between chronic low back pain patients in Germany and Thailand in terms of nature of disease and socioeconomic and psychological factors

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Worldwide, chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common causes of physical and psychological disabilities. The factors that affect low back pain (LBP) between Western and Eastern countries are different.

OBJECTIVE:

We assessed the factors associated with LBP and their impact in German and Thai CLBP participants.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 100 Thai and 100 German CLBP participants. Data were collected before the participants received treatment in the outpatient rehabilitation clinic. We used standardized questionnaires to assess the demographic and socioeconomic data, clinical features of the pain, the impact of pain during daily activities, and psychological consequences.

RESULTS:

We found a statistically significant difference between the two groups for minimal pain intensity (NRS German $=$ 3.01, Thai $=$ 1.83), and the participants’ acceptable pain intensity (NRS German $=$ 1.97, Thai $=$ 3.88). The German participants had a higher negative impact score in their daily living compared to the Thai participants (German $=$ 23.5, Thai $=$ 10). Also, the German participants suffered more often from depression (CES-D score; German $=$ 17, Thai $=$ 4). However, the average back pain intensity was the same for both groups.

CONCLUSION:

German CLBP participants had significantly more depressive symptoms and pain-related impairments compared to the Thai participants. On the other hand, there were no differences in maximum and average pain severities.

Keywords

Chronic low back pain socioeconomic status psychological effect Thailand Germany

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Maher

Underwood

Buchbinder

. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017; 389: 736-47.

GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390: 1211-59.

Diamond

Borenstein

. Chronic low back pain in a working-age adult. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006; 20: 707-20.

Hoy

Bain

Williams

, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64: 2028-37.

Van Tulder

Koes

Bombardier

. Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002; 16: 761-75.

Shaw

Campbell

Nelson

, et al. Effects of workplace, family and cultural influences on low back pain: what opportunities exist to address social factors in general consultations? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013; 27: 637-48.

Sanders

Brena

Spier

, et al. Chronic low back pain patients around the world: cross-cultural similarities and differences. Clin J Pain. 1992; 8: 317-23.

Brena

Sanders

Motoyama

. American and Japanese chronic low back pain patients: cross-cultural similarities and differences. Clin J Pain. 1990; 6: 118-24.

Miller

. The world health organization analgesic ladder. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004; 49: 542-5.

10.

Tait

Chibnall

Krause

. The pain disability index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990; 40: 171-82.

11.

McKillop

Carroll

Dick

, et al. Measuring participation in patients with chronic back pain-the 5-item pain disability index. Spine J. 2018; 18: 307-13.

12.

Grönblad

Hupli

Wennerstrand

, et al. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain. 1993; 9: 189-95.

13.

Nilmanut

Kuptniratsaikul

Pekuman

, et al. The study of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale (CES-D) in thai people in siriraj hospital. ASEAN J Rehabil Med. 1997; 6: 25-30.

14.

Stein

Luppa

Mahnke

, et al. Depressions screening am telefon mittels der allgemeinen depressionsskala (ADS) [screening for depression by telephone using the german version of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D)]. Psychiatr Prax. 2014; 41: 135-41.

15.

Thong

ISK

Tan

Lee

TYC

, et al. A comparison of pain beliefs and coping strategies and their association with chronic pain adjustment between singapore and united states. Pain Med. 2017; 18: 1668-78.

16.

Hobara

. Beliefs about appropriate pain behavior: cross-cultural and sex differences between japanese and euro-americans. Eur J Pain. 2005; 9: 389-93.

17.

Rodrigues-De-Souza

Fernández-De-Las-Peñas

Martín-Vallejo

, et al. Differences in pain perception, health-related quality of life, disability, mood, and sleep between Brazilian and Spanish people with chronic non-specific low back pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016; 20: 412-21.

18.

Tung

. Pain beliefs and behaviors among Chinese. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2015; 27: 95-97.

19.

Billis

McCarthy

Oldham

. Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16: 865-79.

20.

Smith

. The biopsychosocial revolution: interviewing and provider-patient relationships becoming key issues for primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 309-10.