Rotator cuff muscles are structurally and functionally different from other upper-limb muscles because they are responsible for glenohumeral joint stability. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) induces excitability changes (increase or decrease) of the corticospinal tract (CST) in the peripheral muscles, such as those of the finger. However, it remains unclear whether similar results are obtained when targeting the infraspinatus muscle, which has properties that differ from other muscles, in healthy subjects.
OBJECTIVE:
We investigated the immediate effects of NMES on the corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus muscle, a rotator cuff muscle, in healthy subjects.
METHODS:
Thirteen healthy right-handed men (mean age: 26.77 2.08 years) participated in this study. The motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the maximum compound muscle action potential (Mmax) were recorded before NMES to the right infraspinatus and within 15 minutes after the end of the NMES.
RESULTS:
NMES on the infraspinatus muscle significantly increased its MEP amplitude (Pre: 0.45 mV [0.33–0.48]; Post: 0.54 mV [0.46–0.60] (median [lower quartile to higher quartile]); 0.005) but had no effect on Mmax (Pre: 2.95 mV [2.59–4.71]; Post: 3.35 mV [2.76–4.72]; 0.753).
CONCLUSIONS:
NMES application to the infraspinatus muscle increases CST excitability without producing immediate changes in the neuromuscular junction or muscle hypertrophy.
FarinaSTinazziMLe PeraDValerianiM. Pain-related modulation of the human motor cortex. Neurol Res.2003; 25(2): 130-142.
5.
MercierCLeonardG. Interactions between pain and the motor cortex: insights from research on phantom limb pain and complex regional pain syndrome. Physiother Can.2011; 63(3): 305-314.
6.
BankPJPeperCEMarinusJBeekPJvan HiltenJJ. Motor consequences of experimentally induced limb pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain.2013; 17(2): 145-157.
7.
BergquistAJClairJMLagerquistOMangCSOkumaYCollinsDF. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur J Appl Physiol.2011; 111(10): 2409-2426.
8.
TakedaKTaninoGMiyasakaH. Review of devices used in neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017; 10207-213.
9.
ChipchaseLSSchabrunSMHodgesPW. Peripheral electrical stimulation to induce cortical plasticity: a systematic review of stimulus parameters. Clin Neurophysiol.2011; 122(3): 456-463.
10.
AndrewsRKSchabrunSMRiddingMCGaleaMPHodgesPWChipchaseLS. The effect of electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability is dependent on application duration: a same subject pre-post test design. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013; 1051.
11.
MeesenRLCuypersKRothwellJCSwinnenSPLevinO. The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp.2011; 32(6): 872-882.
12.
McDonnellMNRiddingMC. Afferent stimulation facilitates performance on a novel motor task. Exp Brain Res.2006; 170(1): 109-115.
13.
ReddyASMohrKJPinkMMJobeFW. Electromyographic analysis of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles in persons with subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.2000; 9(6): 519-523.
14.
DiederichsenLPWintherADyhre-PoulsenPKrogsgaardMRNorregaardJ. The influence of experimentally induced pain on shoulder muscle activity. Exp Brain Res.2009; 194(3): 329-337.
15.
KimHMDahiyaNTeefeySAMiddletonWDStobbsGSteger-MayK, et al. Location and initiation of degenerative rotator cuff tears: an analysis of three hundred and sixty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2010; 92(5): 1088-1096.
16.
NgomoSMercierCRoyJS. Cortical mapping of the infraspinatus muscle in healthy individuals. BMC Neurosci. 2013; 1452.
17.
BrownSHBrookhamRLDickersonCR. High-pass filtering surface EMG in an attempt to better represent the signals detected at the intramuscular level. Muscle Nerve.2010; 41(2): 234-239.
18.
IshibashiKIshiiDYamamotoSNoguchiATanamachiKKohnoY. Opposite modulations of corticospinal excitability by intermittent and continuous peripheral electrical stimulation in healthy subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2020; 740135467.
19.
McKayDBrookerRGiacominPRiddingMMilesT. Time course of induction of increased human motor cortex excitability by nerve stimulation. Neuroreport.2002; 13(10): 1271-1273.
20.
CharltonCSRiddingMCThompsonPDMilesTS. Prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation induces persistent changes in excitability of human motor cortex. J Neurol Sci.2003; 208(1-2): 79-85.
21.
JohnsonVLHalakiMGinnKA. The use of surface electrodes to record infraspinatus activity is not valid at low infraspinatus activation levels. J Electromyogr Kinesiol.2011; 21(1): 112-118.
22.
GobboMMaffiulettiNAOrizioCMinettoMA. Muscle motor point identification is essential for optimizing neuromuscular electrical stimulation use. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 1117.
23.
DelagiEFPerottoAO. Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk. Charles C Thomas Pub Ltd; 2011.
24.
RothwellJCThompsonPDDayBLBoydSMarsdenCD. Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Exp Physiol.1991; 76(2): 159-200.
25.
GroppaSOlivieroAEisenAQuartaroneACohenLGMallV, et al. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol.2012; 123(5): 858-882.
26.
GasselMM. A Test of Nerve Conduction to Muscles of the Shoulder Girdle as an Aid in the Diagnosis of Proximal Neurogenic and Muscular Disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1964; 27200-205.
27.
Kaelin-LangALuftARSawakiLBursteinAHSohnYHCohenLG. Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol.2002; 540(Pt 2): 623-633.
28.
RiddingMCBrouwerBMilesTSPitcherJBThompsonPD. Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res.2000; 131(1): 135-143.
29.
MangCSClairJMCollinsDF. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has a global effect on corticospinal excitability for leg muscles and a focused effect for hand muscles. Exp Brain Res.2011; 209(3): 355-363.
30.
NgomoSMercierCBouyerLJSavoieARoyJS. Alterations in central motor representation increase over time in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Clin Neurophysiol.2015; 126(2): 365-371.
31.
FacchiniSRomaniMTinazziMAgliotiSM. Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilisation of the ring and little fingers. Clin Neurophysiol.2002; 113(3): 367-375.
32.
GranertOPellerMGaserCGroppaSHallettMKnutzenA, et al. Manual activity shapes structure and function in contralateral human motor hand area. Neuroimage.2011; 54(1): 32-41.
33.
NgomoSLeonardGMercierC. Influence of the amount of use on hand motor cortex representation: effects of immobilization and motor training. Neuroscience. 2012; 220208-214.
34.
VeldmanMPMaffiulettiNAHallettMZijdewindIHortobagyiT. Direct and crossed effects of somatosensory stimulation on neuronal excitability and motor performance in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014; 4722-35.
35.
MyersJBWassingerCALephartSM. Sensorimotor contribution to shoulder stability: effect of injury and rehabilitation. Man Ther.2006; 11(3): 197-201.
