Clinical spinal instability: 10 years since the derivation of a clinical prediction rule. A narrative literature review

Abstract

BACKGROUND

: Between 2005 and 2015 significant changes in the clinical decision making paradigm for the treatment of spinal instability occurred. This was largely motivated by a clinical prediction rule (CPR) derivation study that was developed to specifically identify patients with low back pain who are more likely to respond positively to lumbar stabilization exercises.

OBJECTIVE

: This is a narrative literature review on the recent advances physiotherapy has made in the treatment of clinical spinal instability.

METHODS:

Literature discussing the conservative treatment of lumbar spinal instability published from 2005–2015 was identified with electronic searches of PubMed (MEDLINE) Advanced search, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, MEDLINE (EBSCO), SportDISCUS (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), PEDro, Scopus and Cochrane and reviewed.

RESULTS

: Five systematic reviews, 2 with meta-analyses, and 1 systematic review on the quality of systematic reviews were found. There seems to be some benefit from specific stabilization exercise programs in regards to pain reduction, but they might not be more effective than other forms of exercise. The currently existing CPR for stabilization exercises is not far enough developed to use in clinical practice and is not validated as of yet.

CONCLUSION

: Stabilization exercises seem to decrease chronic low back pain, although it is not clear that this pain has to be caused by clinical spinal instability. Caution should be exercised when using CPRs in the clinic; they are not meant to be strict treatment guidelines, but rather a tool that helps facilitate clinical decision-making.

Keywords

Stability CPR spine lumbar systematic review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cook

Brismee

Sizer

. Subjective and objective descriptors of clinical lumbar spine instability: A Delphi study. Manual Ther 2006; 11(1): 11-21.

Pitkanen

Manninen

Lindgrer

Turunen

Airaksinen

. Limited usefulness of traction-compression films in the radiographic diagnosis of lumbar spinal instability. Comparison with flexion-extension films. Spine 1997; 22(2): 193-7.

Panjabi

. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003; 13(4): 371-9.

Beazell

Mullins

Grindstaff

. Lumbar instability: An evolving and challenging concept. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2010; 18(1): 9-14.

Panjabi

. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part 2. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 1992; 5(4): 390-7.

Paris

. Physical signs of instability. Spine 1985; 10(3): 277-9.

Leone

Guglielmi

Cassar-Pullicino

Bonomo

. Lumbar intervertebral instability: A review. Radiology 2007; 245(1): 62-77.

Biely

Silfies

Smith

Hicks

. Clinical observation of standing trunk movements: What do the aberrant movement patterns tell us? J Orthop Sport Phys 2014; 44(4): 262-72.

Rabin

Shashua

Pizem

Dar

. The interrater reliability of physical examination tests that may predict the outcome or suggest the need for lumbar stabilization exercises. J Orthop Sport Phys 2013; 43(2): 83-90.

10.

Hicks

Fritz

Delitto

McGill

. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2005; 86(9): 1753-62.

11.

Rabin

Shashua

Pizem

Dickstein

Dar

. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain who are likely to experience short-term success following lumbar stabilization exercises: A randomized controlled validation study. J Orthop Sport Phys 2014; 44(1): 6-18.

12.

Kong

Cho

Park

. Changes in the activities of the trunk muscles in different kinds of bridging exercises. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2013; 25: 1609-12.

13.

Leetun

Ireland

Willson

Ballantyne

Davis

. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sport Exer 2004; 36(6): 926-34.

14.

Oliver

Adams-Blair

. Improving core strength to prevent injury. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 2010; 81(7): 15-9.

15.

Sackett

Rosenberg

Gray

Haynes

Richardson

. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312(7023): 71-2.

16.

Uman

. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l’Academie Canadienne de Psychiatrie de l’Enfant et de l’Adolescent 2011; 20(1): 57-9.

17.

Cook

. Potential pitfalls of clinical prediction rules. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2008; 16(2): 69-71.

18.

Beattie

Nelson

. Clinical prediction rules: What are they and what do they tell us? Aust J Physiother 2006; 52(3): 157-63.

19.

Haskins

Rivett

Osmotherly

. Clinical prediction rules in the physiotherapy management of low back pain: A systematic review. Manual Ther 2012; 17(1): 9-21.

20.

Ferreira

Maher

Herbert

Refshauge

. Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: A systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2006; 52(2): 79-88.

21.

Rackwitz

, de Bie

Limm

, von Garnier

Ewert

Stucki

. Segmental stabilizing exercises and low back pain. What is the evidence? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20(7): 553-67.

22.

Hauggaard

Persson

. Specific spinal stabilisation exercises in patients with low back pain – a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews 2007; 12: 233-48.

23.

Lewis

Morris

Walsh

. Are physiotherapy exercises effective in reducing chronic low back pain? Physical Therapy Reviews 2008; 13(1): 37-44.

24.

Macedo

Maher

Latimer

McAuley

. Motor control exercise for persistent, nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review. Physical Therapy 2009; 89(1): 9-25.

25.

Haladay

Miller

Challis

Denegar

. Quality of systematic reviews on specific spinal stabilization exercise for chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013; 43(4): 242-50.

26.

Kumar

. Efficacy of segmental stabilization exercise for lumbar segmental instability in patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized placebo controlled crossover study. North American Journal of Medical Sciences 2011; 3(10): 456-61.

27.

Javadian

Behtash

Akbari

Taghipour-Darzi

Zekavat

. The effects of stabilizing exercises on pain and disability of patients with lumbar segmental instability. J Back Musculoskelet 2012; 25(3): 149-55.

28.

Puntumetakul

Areeudomwong

Emasithi

Yamauchi

. Effect of 10-week core stabilization exercise training and detraining on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability. Patient Preference and Adherence 2013; 7: 1189-99.

29.

Stanton

Fritz

Hancock

Latimer

Maher

Wand

, et al. Evaluation of a treatment-based classification algorithm for low back pain: A cross-sectional study. Physical Therapy 2011; 91(4): 496-509.

30.

Teyhen

Flynn

Childs

Abraham

. Arthrokinematics in a subgroup of patients likely to benefit from a lumbar stabilization exercise program. Phys Ther 2007; 87(3): 313-25.

31.

Sengupta

Fan

. The basis of mechanical instability in degenerative disc disease: A cadaveric study of abnormal motion versus load distribution. Spine 2014; 39(13): 1032-43.