Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-7
Upper cervical and upper thoracic spine mobilization versus deep cervical flexors exercise in individuals with forward head posture: A randomized clinical trial investigating their effectiveness
Although commonly utilized treatments, no study has directly compared the effectiveness of joint mobilization and stabilization exercise in individuals with forward head posture (FHP).
OBJECTIVE:
This study aimed to investigate the effects of upper cervical and upper thoracic spine mobilization versus deep cervical flexors exercise (DCFE) in individuals with FHP.
METHODS:
Thirty-one participants with FHP were randomized into the mobilization ( 15) or exercise ( 16) group. The treatment period was 4 weeks with follow-up assessment at 4 weeks and 6 weeks after the initial examination. Outcomes assessed included the craniovertebral angle (CVA), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), respiratory function, and the global rating of change (GRC).
RESULTS:
Participants in the mobilization group demonstrated significant improvements ( 0.05) in CVA, NPRS, and respiratory function, as compared to those in the exercise group. In addition, 9 of 15 (60%) participants in the mobilization group, as compared to 4 of 16 participants (25%) in the exercise group, had a GRC score of 4 or higher.
CONCLUSIONS:
The combination of upper cervical and upper thoracic spine mobilization indicated better overall short-term outcomes in CVA, NPRS, respiratory function, and GRC compared with DCFE in individuals with FHP.
SmithA. Smartphone ownership – 2013 update. Pew Research Center: Washington DC 2013, p. 2013.
2.
StrakerLMColemanJSkossRMaslenBABurgess-LimerickRPollockCM. A comparison of posture and muscle activity during tablet computer, desktop computer and paper use by young children. Ergonomics.2008; 51(4): 540-555.
3.
StrakerLBurgess-LimerickRPollockCColemanJSkossRMaslenB. Children’s posture and muscle activity at different computer display heights and during paper information technology use. Hum Factors.2008; 50(1): 49-61.
4.
HarrisonDEHarrisonDDBetzJJJanikTJHollandBCollocaCJ, et al. Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.2003; 26(3): 139-151.
5.
KimSYKooSJ. Effect of duration of smartphone use on muscle fatigue and pain caused by forward head posture in adults. J Phys Ther Sci.2016; 28(6): 1669-1672.
6.
MiyazakiMHymansonHJMorishitaYHeWZhangHWuG, et al. Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2008; 33(23): E870-876.
7.
MostamandJLotfiHSafiN. Evaluating the head posture of dentists with no neck pain. J Bodywork Movement Ther.2013; 17(4): 430-433.
8.
SalahzadehZMaroufiNAhmadiABehtashHRazmjooAGohariM, et al. Assessment of forward head posture in females: observational and photogrammetry methods. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil.2014; 27(2): 131-139.
9.
HickeyERRondeauMJCorrenteJRAbysalhJSeymourCJ. Reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device and plumb-line techniques in measuring resting head posture (RHP). J Man Manip Ther.2000; 8(1): 10-17.
10.
KapreliEVourazanisEBillisEOldhamJAStrimpakosN. Respiratory dysfunction in chronic neck pain patients. A pilot study. Cephalalgia.2009; 29(7): 701-710.
11.
LangfordML. Poor posture subjects a worker’s body to muscle imbalance, nerve compression. Occup Health Saf.1994; 63(9): 38-40, 42.
12.
DimitriadisZKapreliEStrimpakosNOldhamJ. Respiratory weakness in patients with chronic neck pain. Man Ther.2013; 18(3): 248-253.
13.
LauHMChiuTTLamTH. Measurement of craniovertebral angle with Electronic Head Posture Instrument: Criterion validity. J Rehabil Res Dev.2010; 47(9): 911-918.
14.
PerriMAHalfordE. Pain and faulty breathing: a pilot study. J Bodywork Movement Ther.2004; 8(4): 297-306.
15.
EdwardsS. Neurological Physiotherapy: A problem-solving approach: Elsevier Health Sciences 2002.
16.
JullGKristjanssonEDall’AlbaP. Impairment in the cervical flexors: a comparison of whiplash and insidious onset neck pain patients. Man Ther.2004; 9(2): 89-94.
17.
MooreMK. Upper crossed syndrome and its relationship to cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.2004; 27(6): 414-420.
18.
LegrandASchneiderEGevenoisPADe TroyerA. Respiratory effects of the scalene and sternomastoid muscles in humans. J Appl Physiol.2003; 94(4): 1467-1472.
19.
KapreliEVourazanisEStrimpakosN. Neck pain causes respiratory dysfunction. Med Hypotheses.2008; 70(5): 1009-1013.
20.
D’SylvaJMillerJGrossABurnieSJGoldsmithCHGrahamN, et al. Manual therapy with or without physical medicine modalities for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther.2010; 15(5): 415-433.
21.
MillerJGrossAD’SylvaJBurnieSJGoldsmithCHGrahamN, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther.2010; 15(4): 334-354.
22.
MasaracchioMClelandJAHellmanMHaginsM. Short-term combined effects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation and cervical spine nonthrust manipulation in individuals with mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.2013; 43(3): 118-127.
23.
FaulFErdfelderELangAGBuchnerA. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods.2007; 39(2): 175-191.
24.
DunningJRClelandJAWaldropMAArnotCFYoungIATurnerM, et al. Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.2012; 42(1): 5-18.
25.
KaltenbornFMEvjenthOKaltenbornTBVollowitzE. The spine: Basic evaluation and mobilization techniques: Olaf Norlis Bokhandel. 1993.
26.
HengeveldEBanksK. Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation E-Book: Management of Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders: Elsevier Health Sciences. 2013.
27.
FallaDLCampbellCDFaganAEThompsonDCJullGA. Relationship between cranio-cervical flexion range of motion and pressure change during the cranio-cervical flexion test. Man Ther.2003; 8(2): 92-96.
28.
Fernandez-de-las-PenasCPerez-de-HerediaMMolero-SanchezAMiangolarra-PageJC. Performance of the craniocervical flexion test, forward head posture, and headache clinical parameters in patients with chronic tension-type headache: a pilot study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.2007; 37(2): 33-39.
29.
HudswellSVon MengersenMLucasN. The cranio-cervical flexion test using pressure biofeedback: A useful measure of cervical dysfunction in the clinical setting? Int J Ossteopath Med.2005; 8(3): 98-105.
30.
WatsonDHTrottPH. Cervical headache: an investigation of natural head posture and upper cervical flexor muscle performance. Cephalalgia.1993; 13(4): 272-284; discussion 232.
31.
YipCHChiuTTPoonAT. The relationship between head posture and severity and disability of patients with neck pain. Man Ther.2008; 13(2): 148-154.
32.
DiabAAMoustafaIM. The efficacy of forward head correction on nerve root function and pain in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a randomized trial. Clin Rehabil.2012; 26(4): 351-361.
33.
RaineSTwomeyLT. Head and shoulder posture variations in 160 asymptomatic women and men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1997; 78(11): 1215-1223.
34.
PriceDDBushFMLongSHarkinsSW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain.1994; 56(2): 217-226.
35.
Ferreira-ValenteMAPais-RibeiroJLJensenMP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain.2011; 152(10): 2399-2404.
36.
ClelandJAChildsJDWhitmanJM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2008; 89(1): 69-74.
37.
ClelandJAGlynnPWhitmanJMEberhartSLMacDonaldCChildsJD. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther.2007; 87(4): 431-440.
38.
JaeschkeRSingerJGuyattGH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials.1989; 10(4): 407-415.
39.
ClelandJAChildsJDMcRaeMPalmerJAStowellT. Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther.2005; 10(2): 127-135.
40.
Gonzalez-IglesiasJFernandez-de-las-PenasCClelandJAAlburquerque-SendinFPalomeque-del-CerroLMendez-SanchezR. Inclusion of thoracic spine thrust manipulation into an electro-therapy/thermal program for the management of patients with acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther.2009; 14(3): 306-313.
41.
McNairPJPorteroPChiquetCMawstonGLavasteF. Acute neck pain: cervical spine range of motion and position sense prior to and after joint mobilization. Man Ther.2007; 12(4): 390-394.
42.
KanlayanaphotpornRChiradejnantAVachalathitiR. The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2009; 90(2): 187-192.
43.
GrossARHovingJLHainesTAGoldsmithCHKayTAkerP, et al. A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(14): 1541-1548.
44.
BialoskyJEBishopMDPriceDDRobinsonMEGeorgeSZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther.2009; 14(5): 531-538.
45.
GosselinkATBlanksmaPKCrijnsHJVan GelderICde KamPJHillegeHL, et al. Left ventricular beat-to-beat performance in atrial fibrillation: contribution of Frank-Starling mechanism after short rather than long RR intervals. J Am Coll Cardiol.1995; 26(6): 1516-1521.
46.
AlmeidaVPGuimaraesFSMocoVJMenezesSLMafortTTLopesAJ. [Correlation between pulmonary function, posture, and body composition in patients with asthma]. Rev Port Pneumol.2013; 19(5): 204-210.
47.
HwangboPNHwangboGParkJLeeS. The Effect of Thoracic Joint Mobilization and Self-stretching Exercise on Pulmonary Functions of Patients with Chronic Neck Pain. J Phys Ther Sci.2014; 26(11): 1783-1786.
