The effectiveness of proprioceptive and neuromuscular training compared to bracing in reducing the recurrence rate of ankle sprains in athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Ankle sprains are common musculoskeletal injuries in which the ligaments of the ankle partially or completely tear due to sudden stretching.

OBJECTIVES:

To critically appraise, evaluate and establish the best available evidence to determine the effectiveness of proprioceptive and neuromuscular training (PNT) compared to bracing in reducing the recurrence rate of ankle sprains in athletes.

METHODOLOGY:

The following seven databases were searched in June 2017: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, EBSCO Host: CINAHL. The main search terms used were “ankle sprains”, “proprioceptive training”, “neuromuscular training” and “bracing”. The quality of the trials were critically appraised according to the PEDro scale. The RevMan 5 ${}^{\mathrm{\copyright }}$ software was used to pool results.

RESULTS:

Three studies met the inclusion criteria and the quality according to the PEDro scale ranged from 4/10–7/10. The pooled data showed no difference between PNT and bracing in reducing the recurrence rate of ankle sprains in athletes at 12 months after initiation of the study.

CONCLUSION:

This systematic review of the overall effect suggested that current evidence (Level II) does not favour the use of PNT over bracing in reducing the recurrence rate of ankle sprains. Physiotherapists are advised to use either PNT or bracing according to the patients preference and their own expertise.