The clinical factors associated with benefit finding of complementary medicine use in patients with back pain: A cross-sectional study with cluster analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2017
The clinical factors associated with benefit finding of complementary medicine use in patients with back pain: A cross-sectional study with cluster analysis
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has been increasing.
OBJECTIVE:
To identify the factors associated with perceived benefit from CAM methods in back problems.
METHODS:
The study was conducted on patients who practiced any CAM methods due to complaints of back pain. Social-demographic properties, details of CAM methods employed were questioned. Severity of pain was measured by visual analog scale (VAS); benefits were evaluated by the Likert scale. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to discover relationships among variables.
RESULTS:
In total, 500 patients (265 female, 235 male) were included in the study. Mostly used methods were herbal therapy(32%), balneotherapy (31%), cupping (19.4%) and massage-manipulation (19.2%). Of patients, 355 (71%) were satisfied. The variables associated with benefit finding were female gender, age, chronicity and severity of pain, high educational level, upper middle income status, use as a result of recommendation, dissatisfaction with conventional methods, residence in an urban area, non-herbal method use, being married, and social insurance (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION:
The majority of patients using CAM perceived benefits; in particular, women living in urban areas, highly educated, aged more than 40, who suffer from severe chronic back pain, may be more inclined to go to CAM therapists.
MahaN, ShawA. Academic doctors' views of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its role within the NHS: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2007; 7: 17.
2.
HarrisPE, CooperKL, ReltonC, ThomasKJ. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract. 2012; 66: 915-6.
3.
KizhakkeveetilA, RoseK, KadarGE. Integrative therapies for low back pain that include complementary and alternative medicine care: a systematic review. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014; 3(5): 49-64.
4.
BroomAF, KirbyER, SibbrittDW, AdamsJ, RefshaugeKM. Use of complementary and alternative medicine by mid-aged women with back pain: A national cross sectional survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012; 12: 98.
5.
KanodiaAK, LegedzaATR, DavisRB, EisenbergDM, PhilipsRS. Perceived Benefit of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Back Pain: A National Survey. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010; 23(3): 354-362.
6.
GrazioS, BalenD. Complementary and alternative treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Acta Clin Croat. 2011; 50(4): 513-530.
7.
ArtusM, CroftP, LewisM. The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain. BMC Fam Pract. 2007; 8: 26.
8.
SibbrittD, AdamsJ. Back pain amongst 8,910 young Australian women:a longitudinal analysis of the use of conventional providers, complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and self-prescribed CAM. Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 29: 25-32.
9.
GhildayalN, JohnsonPJ, EvansRL, KreitzerMJ. Complementary and alternative medicine use in the US adult low back pain population. Glob Adv Health Med. 2016; 5(1): 69-78.
10.
Traditional Medicine. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs134/enx.
11.
HuntK, ErnstE. Patients' use of CAM: Results from the Health Survey for England 2005. Focus Alt Complement Ther. 2010; 15: 101-3.
12.
CilingirD, HintistanS, YigitbasC, NuralN. Nonmedical methods to relieve low back pain caused by lumbar disc herniation: A descriptive study in northeastern Turkey. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014; 15(2): 449-57.
13.
MartinBI, GerkovichMM, DeyoRA, ShermanKJ, CherkinDC, LindBK, GoertzCM, LaffertyWE. The association of CAM use and health care expenditures for back and neck problems. Med Care. 2012; 50(12): 1029-1036.
14.
BishopFL, YardleyL, LewithGT. Why consumers maintain complementary and alternative medicine use: a qualitative study. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2010; 16(2): 175-82.
15.
ErnstE, HungS. Great expectations: What do patients using complementary and alternative medicine hope for?Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. 2011; 4(2): 89-101.
16.
RobinsonA, McGrailMR. Disclosure of cam use to medical practitioners: A review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Complement Ther Med. 2004; 12: 90-98.
17.
PattersonC, ArthurH. A complementary alternative medicine questionnaire for young adults. Integr Med Insights. 2009; 4: 1-11.
18.
SleathB, CallahanLF, DevellisRF, BeardA. Patients' perceptions of rheumatologists' participatory decision-making style and communication about complementary and alternative medicine. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(3): 416-421.
19.
DixonJS, BirdHA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analog scale. Ann Rheum Dis. 1981; 40: 87-89.
20.
The National Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Cervices. What is CAM? [2007] Available at:http://nccam.nih.gov/health/ whatiscam/.
21.
Ben-AryeE, FrenkelM, KleinA, ScharfM. Attitudes toward integration of complementary and alternative medicine in primary care: Perspectives of patients, physicians and complementary practitioners. Patient Education and Counseling. 2008; 70(3): 395-402.
22.
LikertL. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol Bronconeumol. 1932; 140: 44-60.
23.
KettenringJR. The practice of cluster analysis. J. Classif. 2006; 23: 3-30.
24.
UlusoyH, GucerTK, AksuM, ArslanS, HabibogluA, AkgolG, BilgiciA, KuruO, CetinI, KamanlıA, OzgocmenS. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in Turkish patients with rheumatic diseases. Turk J Rheumatol. 2012; 27(1): 31-37.
25.
TabishSA. Complementary and Alternative Healthcare:Is it Evidence-based?Int J Health Sci. 2008; 2(1): 5-9.
26.
NdetanHT, BaeS, Evans JrMW, RupertRL, SinghKP. Characterization of health status and modifiable risk behavior among United States adults using chiropractic care as compared with general medical care. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009; 32(6): 414-422.
HaetzmanM, ElliottAM, SmithBH, HannafordP, ChambersWA. Chronic pain and the use of conventional and alternative therapy. Fam Pract. 2003; 20(2): 147-54.
29.
MurthyV, SibbrittDW, AdamsJ. An integrative review of complementary and alternative medicine use for back pain: A focus on prevalence, reasons for use, influential factors, self-perceived effectiveness, and communication. Spine J. 2015; 15(8): 1870-83.
30.
Ndao-BrumblaySK, GreenCR. Predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use in chronic pain patients. Pain Med J. 2010; 11(1): 16-24.
31.
EavesER, ShermanKJ, RitenbaughC, HsuC, NichterM, TurnerJA, CherkinDC. A qualitative study of changes in expectations over time among patients with chronic low back pain seeking four CAM therapies. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015; 15: 12.
32.
BaartsC, PedersenIK. Derivative benefits: exploring the body through complementary and alternative medicine. Sociol Health Illn. 2009; 31(5): 719-33.
33.
De SilvaV, El-MetwallyA, ErnstE, LewithG, MacfarlaneGJ. Evidence for the efficacy of complementary and alternative medicines in the management of fibromyalgia: A systematic review. Rheumatology. 2010; 49: 1063-1068.
34.
OwensJE, MenardM. The Quantification of Placebo Effects Within a General Model of Health Care Outcomes. J Altern Complement Med. 2011; 17(9): 817-21.
35.
FurlanAD, YazdiF, TsertsvadzeA, GrossA, Van TulderM, SantaguidaL. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low back pain. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012; 953139.
36.
FrassM, StrassiPR, FriehsH, MüllnerM, KundiM, KayeAD. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personel: A systematic review. The Ochsner Journal. 2012; 12: 45-46.
