This study explores the dynamics of a mathematical model, utilizing ordinary differential equations (ODE), to depict the interplay between cancer cells and effector cells under chemotherapy. The stability of the equilibrium points in the model is analysed using the Jacobian matrix and eigenvalues. Additionally, bifurcation analysis is conducted to determine the optimal values for the control parameters.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the performance of the model and control strategies, benchmarking simulations are performed using the PlatEMO platform.
METHODS:
The Pure Multi-objective Optimal Control Problem (PMOCP) and the Hybrid Multi-objective Optimal Control Problem (HMOCP) are two different forms of optimal control problems that are solved using revolutionary metaheuristic optimisation algorithms. The utilization of the Hypervolume (HV) performance indicator allows for the comparison of various metaheuristic optimization algorithms in their efficacy for solving the PMOCP and HMOCP.
RESULTS:
Results indicate that the MOPSO algorithm excels in solving the HMOCP, with M-MOPSO outperforming for PMOCP in HV analysis.
CONCLUSION:
Despite not directly addressing immediate clinical concerns, these findings indicates that the stability shifts at critical thresholds may impact treatment efficacy.
AgurZ.ElishmereniM.ForyśU. and KoganY., Accelerating the development of personalized cancer immunotherapy by integrating molecular patients’ profiles with dynamic mathematical models, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics108(3) (2020), 515–527.
2.
de PillisL.G., Chemotherapy for tumors: an analysis of the dynamics and a study of quadratic and linear optimal controls, Math Biosci209(1) (2007), 292–315. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2006.05.003.
3.
ShindiO.KanesanJ.KendallG. and RamanathanA., The combined effect of optimal control and swarm intelligence on optimization of cancer chemotherapy, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine189(1) (2020), 105327.
4.
SamyP.G.KanesanJ. and TiuZ.C., Optimization of chemotherapy using hybrid optimal control and swarm intelligence, IEEE Access (2023), 1. doi:10.1109/access.2023.3254210.
5.
SbeityH., Review of optimization methods for cancer chemotherapy treatment planning, Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology8(2) (2015). doi:10.4172/jcsb.1000173.
6.
SharifiM.JamshidiA.A. and SarvestaniN.N., An adaptive robust control strategy in a cancer tumor-immune system under uncertainties, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics16(3) (2018), 865–873.
7.
TranA.P.Ali Al-RadhawiM.KarevaI.WuJ.WaxmanD.J. and SontagE.D., Delicate balances in cancer chemotherapy: modeling immune recruitment and emergence of systemic drug resistance, Frontiers in immunology11 (2020), 1376.
8.
OelkrugC. and RamageJ.M., Enhancement of T cell recruitment and infiltration into tumours, Clinical and Experimental Immunology178(1) (2014), 1–8. doi:10.1111/cei.12382.
9.
GloriusP., The novel tribody [(CD20)2xCD16] efficiently triggers effector cell-mediated lysis of malignant B cells, Leukemia27(1) (2013), 190–201. doi:10.1038/leu.2012.150.
10.
de PillisL.G.RadunskayaA.E. and WisemanC.L., A validated mathematical model of cell-mediated immune response to tumor growth, Cancer Research65(17) (2005), 7950–7958.
11.
SharmaP.KumarP. and SharmaR., Natural killer cells-their role in tumour immunosurveillance, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR11(8) (2017), BE01. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/26748.10469.
12.
de PillisL.G.GuW. and RadunskayaA.E., Mixed immunotherapy and chemotherapy of tumors: modeling, applications and biological interpretations, Journal of Theoretical Biology238(4) (2006), 841–862.
13.
SharifiN.OzgoliS. and RamezaniA., Multiple model predictive control for optimal drug administration of mixed immunotherapy and chemotherapy of tumours, Comput Methods Programs Biomed144 (2017), 13–19. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.03.012.
14.
BashkirtsevaI.ChukharevaA. and RyashkoL., Stochastic dynamics of nonlinear tumor–immune system with chemotherapy, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications622 (2023), 128835.
15.
SongG.LiangG.TianT. and ZhangX., Mathematical modeling and analysis of tumor chemotherapy, Symmetry14(4) (2022), 704. doi:10.3390/sym14040704.
16.
MiK., Characterizing heterogeneity of non-small cell lung tumour microenvironment to identify signature prognostic genes, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine24(24) (2020), 14608–14618.
17.
SubhanF., Cancerous tumor controlled treatment using search heuristic (GA)-based sliding mode and synergetic controller, Cancers14(17) (2022), 4191.
18.
DasA.DehingiaK.RayN. and SarmahH.K., Stability analysis of a targeted chemotherapy-cancer model, Mathematical Modelling and Control3(2) (2023), 116–126.
19.
AlharbiS.A. and RambelyA.S., A new ODE-based model for tumor cells and immune system competition, Mathematics8(8) (2020), 1285.
20.
SteinR.R., Ecological modeling from time-series inference: insight into dynamics and stability of intestinal microbiota, PLoS Computational Biology9(12) (2013), e1003388. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003388.
21.
BesseA.ClappG.D.BernardS.NicoliniF.E.LevyD. and LepoutreT., Stability analysis of a model of interaction between the immune system and cancer cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology80(5) (2018), 1084–1110. doi:10.1007/s11538-017-0272-7.
22.
UnniP. and SeshaiyerP., Mathematical modeling, analysis, and simulation of tumor dynamics with drug interventions, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine2019 (2019), 1–13.
23.
TianY.ZhuW.ZhangX. and JinY., A practical tutorial on solving optimization problems via PlatEMOs, Neurocomputing (2022).
24.
TianY.ChengR.ZhangX. and JinY., PlatEMO: A MATLAB platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization [Educational Forum], IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine12(4) (2017), 73–87. doi:10.1109/mci.2017.2742868.
25.
LobatoF.S.MachadoV.S. and Steffen Jr.V., Determination of an optimal control strategy for drug administration in tumor treatment using multi-objective optimization differential evolution, Comput Methods Programs Biomed131 (2016), 51–61. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.04.004.
26.
FonsecaC.M.PaqueteL. and López-IbánezM., An improved dimension-sweep algorithm for the hypervolume indicator, in: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE, 2006, pp. 1157–1163.
27.
GuerreiroA.P. and FonsecaC.M., An analysis of the hypervolume sharpe-ratio indicator, European Journal of Operational Research283(2) (2020), 614–629.
28.
WeiB., Stability analysis of equilibrium point and limit cycle of two-dimensional nonlinear dynamical systems—a tutorial, Applied Sciences13(2) (2023), 1136. doi:10.3390/app13021136.
29.
TianY.SunM.YangS. and ZhangX., Tagging Metaheuristics with Problem-Oriented Labels for Non-Expert Users, IEEE, Singapore, 2022. doi:10.1109/ssci51031.2022.10022221 [Online].
30.
ChengR., A benchmark test suite for evolutionary many-objective optimization, Complex & Intelligent Systems3(1) (2017), 67–81. doi:10.1007/s40747-017-0039-7.
31.
XieY.QiaoJ.WangD. and YinB., A novel decomposition-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm using improved multiple adaptive dynamic selection strategies, Information Sciences556 (2021), 472–494.
32.
BrownH.E.SuryanarayananS. and HeydtG.T., Some characteristics of emerging distribution systems considering the smart grid initiative, The Electricity Journal23(5) (2010), 64–75.
