Compression properties and dissolution of bioactive glass S53P4 and n-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive-composite

Abstract

Bioactive glass (BG)-containing fiber-reinforced composite implants, typically screw-retained, have started to be used clinically. In this study, we tested the mechanical strength of composites formed by a potential implant adhesive of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue and BG S53P4 particles. Water immersion for 3, 10 or 30 days had no adverse effect on the compression strength. When cyanoacrylate glue-BG-composites were subjected to simulated body fluid immersion, the average pH rose to 7.52 (SD 0.066) from the original value of 7.35 after 7 days, and this pH increment was smaller compared to BG particle-group or fibrin glue-BG-composite group. Based on these results n-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate glue, by potentially producing a strong adhesion, might be considered a possible alternative for fixation of BG S53P4 containing composite implants. However, the mechanical and solubility properties of the cyanoacrylate glue may not encourage the use of this tissue adhesive with BG particles.

Keywords

Bioactive glass S53P4 cyanoacrylate adhesive tissue glue compression strength water sorption

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Spotnitz

W.D.

and Burks

, Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives III: A new update as well as cost and regulatory considerations for components of the surgical toolbox, Transfusion 52(10) (2012), 2243–2255. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03707.x.

Coover

H.W.

Joyner

F.B.

Shearer

N.H.

and Wicker

T.H.

, Chemistry and performance of cyanoacrylate adhesive, J. Soc. Plast. Surg. England 15 (1959), 5–6.

Sanders

D.L.

and Waydia

, A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair, Hernia 18(2) (2014), 165–176. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1093-8.

Rana

and Savant

, A brief review of techniques used to seal corneal perforation using cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive, Cont. Lens. Anterior Eye 36(4) (2013), 156–158. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.03.006.

Deenadayal

D.S.

Neeli

A.K.

and Patel

S.H.

, Graft uptake rates with isoamyl-2-cyanoacrylate in myringoplasty procedures: A 10-year retrospective study, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 145(3) (2011), 442–445. doi:10.1177/0194599811404963.

Hoffmann

Volkmer

Kokott

Augat

Ohnmacht

Sedlmayr

Schieker

Claes

Mutschler

and Ziegler

, Characterisation of a new bioadhesive system based on polysaccharides with the potential to be used as bone glue, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 20(10) (2009), 2001–2009. doi:10.1007/s10856-009-3782-5.

Kyung

Song

S.H.

Kang

and Oh

S.H.

, Medpor implant fixation using fibrin glue in blowout fracture surgery, J. Craniofac. Surg. 24(5) (2013), 1781–1784. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a21076.

Aitasalo

K.M.

Piitulainen

J.M.

Rekola

and Vallittu

P.K.

, Craniofacial bone reconstruction with bioactive fiber-reinforced composite implant, Head Neck 36(5) (2014), 722–728. doi:10.1002/hed.23370.

Vallittu

P.K.

Närhi

T.O.

and Hupa

, Fiber glass–bioactive glass composite for bone replacing and bone anchoring implants, Dent. Mater. 31(4) (2015), 371–381. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.003.

10.

Zou

Y.F.

Chu

Wang

C.B.

and Hu

Z.Y.

, Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: Plates and screws, Eur. J. Radiol. 84(3) (2015), 450–457. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.001.

11.

Mehdizadeh

and Yang

, Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives, Macromol. Biosci. 13(3) (2013), 271–288. doi:10.1002/mabi.201200332.

12.

Tuusa

S.M.

Lassila

L.V.

Matinlinna

J.P.

Peltola

M.J.

and Vallittu

P.K.

, Initial adhesion of glass-fiber-reinforced composite to the surface of porcine calvarial bone, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 75(2) (2005), 334–342. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30311.

13.

Reck

, Bioactive glass-ceramics in ear surgery: Animal studies and clinical results, Laryngoscope 94(2 Pt. 2 Suppl. 33) (1984), 1–54. doi:10.1288/00005537-198402001-00001.

14.

Schepers

E.J.

Ducheyne

Barbier

and Schepers

, Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range: A new material for the repair of bone defects, Implant Dent. 2(3) (1993), 151. doi:10.1097/00008505-199309000-00002.

15.

Stoor

Söderling

and Salonen

J.I.

, Antibacterial effects of a bioactive glass paste on oral microorganisms, Acta Odontol. Scand. 56(3) (1998), 161–165. doi:10.1080/000163598422901.

16.

Stoor

Söderling

and Grenman

, Interactions between the bioactive glass S53P4 and the atrophic rhinitis-associated microorganism klebsiella ozaenae, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 48(6) (1999), 869–874. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:6<869::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-6.

17.

Munukka

Leppäranta

Korkeamäki

Vaahtio

Peltola

Zhang

Hupa

Ylänen

Salonen

J.I.

Viljanen

M.K.

and Eerola

, Bactericidal effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19(1) (2008), 27–32. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3143-1.

18.

Leppäranta

Vaahtio

Peltola

Zhang

Hupa

Ylänen

Salonen

J.I.

Viljanen

M.K.

and Eerola

, Antibacterial effect of bioactive glasses on clinically important anaerobic bacteria in vitro, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19(2) (2008), 547–551. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3018-5.

19.

Wilson

Pigott

G.H.

Schoen

F.J.

and Hench

L.L.

, Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 15(6) (1981), 805–817. doi:10.1002/jbm.820150605.

20.

Lindfors

N.C.

and Aho

A.J.

, Tissue response to bioactive glass and autogenous bone in the rabbit spine, Eur. Spine J. 9(1) (2000), 30–35. doi:10.1007/s005860050005.

21.

Peltola

Aitasalo

Suonpää

Varpula

and Yli-Urpo

, Bioactive glass S53P4 in frontal sinus obliteration: A long-term clinical experience, Head Neck 28(9) (2006), 834–841. doi:10.1002/hed.20436.

22.

Peltola

Kinnunen

and Aitasalo

, Reconstruction of orbital wall defects with bioactive glass plates, J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 66(4) (2008), 639–646. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.019.

23.

Silvola

J.T.

, Mastoidectomy cavity obliteration with bioactive glass: A pilot study, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 147(1) (2012), 119–126. doi:10.1177/0194599812438168.

24.

Sarin

Grénman

Aitasalo

and Pulkkinen

, Bioactive glass S53P4 in mastoid obliteration surgery for chronic otitis media and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 121(9) (2012), 563–569. doi:10.1177/000348941212100901.

25.

Peltola

M.J.

Vallittu

P.K.

Vuorinen

Aho

A.A.

Puntala

and Aitasalo

K.M.

, Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction, Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 269(2) (2012), 623–628. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1607-x.

26.

Lindfors

N.C.

Hyvönen

Nyyssönen

Kirjavainen

Kankare

Gullichsen

and Salo

, Bioactive glass S53P4 as bone graft substitute in treatment of osteomyelitis, Bone 47(2) (2010), 212–218. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.030.

27.

McAndrew

Efrimescu

Sheehan

and Niall

, Through the looking glass; bioactive glass S53P4 (BonAlive^®) in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis, Ir. J. Med. Sci. 182(3) (2013), 509–511. doi:10.1007/s11845-012-0895-5.

28.

Buckley

M.J.

and Beckman

E.J.

, Adhesive use in oral and maxillofacial surgery, Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 22(1) (2010), 195–199. doi:10.1016/j.coms.2009.10.008.

29.

Gosain

A.K.

Song

Corrao

M.A.

and Pintar

F.A.

, Biomechanical evaluation of titanium, biodegradable plate and screw, and cyanoacrylate glue fixation systems in craniofacial surgery, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101(3) (1998), 582–591. doi:10.1097/00006534-199803000-00004.

30.

Kokubo

and Takadama

, How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?, Biomaterials 27(15) (2006), 2907–2915. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017.

31.

Toriumi

D.M.

Raslan

W.F.

Friedman

and Tardy

M.E.

, Histotoxicity of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. A comparative study, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 116(5) (1990), 546–550. doi:10.1001/archotol.1990.01870050046004.

32.

Toriumi

D.M.

Raslan

W.F.

Friedman

and Tardy

M.E.

Jr. , Variable histotoxicity of histoacryl when used in a subcutaneous site: An experimental study, Laryngoscope 101(4 Pt. 1) (1991), 339–343.

33.

Shermak

M.A.

Wong

Inoue

Crain

B.J.

M.J.

Chao

E.Y.

and Manson

P.N.

, Fixation of the craniofacial skeleton with butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and its effects on histotoxicity and healing, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102(2) (1998), 309–318. doi:10.1097/00006534-199808000-00003.

34.

Smith

G.H.

McEachan

J.E.

McLean

and Huntley

J.S.

, Prevention of knot slippage with the use of cyanoacrylate glue: A mechanical study, J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong) 21(1) (2013), 65–67.

35.

García Páez

J.M.

Jorge Herrero

Rocha

Maestro

Castillo-Olivares

J.L.

Millan

Carrera Sanmartin

and Cordon

, Comparative study of the mechanical behaviour of a cyanoacrylate and a bioadhesive, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 15(2) (2004), 109–115. doi:10.1023/B:JMSM.0000011810.12031.c6.

36.

Ahn

D.K.

Sims

C.D.

Randolph

M.A.

O’Connor

Butler

P.E.

Amarante

M.T.

and Yaremchuk

M.J.

, Craniofacial skeletal fixation using biodegradable plates and cyanoacrylate glue, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 99(6) (1997), 1508–1515. doi:10.1097/00006534-199705010-00005.

37.

Oral

Lassila

L.V.

Kumbuloglu

and Vallittu

P.K.

, Bioactive glass particulate filler composite: Effect of coupling of fillers and filler loading on some physical properties, Dent. Mater. 30(5) (2014), 570–577. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.017.

38.

Kull

Martinelli

Briganti

Losi

Spiller

Tonlorenzi

and Soldani

, Glubran2 surgical glue: In vitro evaluation of adhesive and mechanical properties, J. Surg. Res. 157(1) (2009), e15–e21.

39.

Zhang

Leppäranta

Munukka

et al., Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 93(2) (2010), 475–483.

40.

Quinn

J.V.

Osmond

M.H.

Yurack

J.A.

and Moir

P.J.

, N-2-butylcyanoacrylate: Risk of bacterial contamination with an appraisal of its antimicrobial effects, J. Emerg. Med. 13(4) (1995), 581–585. doi:10.1016/0736-4679(95)80025-5.

41.

Wilkinson

J.N.

Chikhani

Mortimer

and Gill

S.J.

, The antimicrobial effect of histoacryl skin adhesive, Anaesthesia 63(12) (2008), 1382–1384. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05775.x.

42.

Romero

I.L.

Malta

J.B.

Silva

C.B.

Mimica

L.M.

Soong

K.H.

and Hida

R.Y.

, Antibacterial properties of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive: Does the polymerization reaction play a role?, Indian J. Ophthalmol. 57(5) (2009), 341–344. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.55065.

43.

Monfoulet

L.E.

Becquart

Marchat

Vandamme

Bourguignon

Pacard

Viateau

Petite

and Logeart-Avramoglou

, The pH in the microenvironment of human mesenchymal stem cells is a critical factor for optimal osteogenesis in tissue-engineered constructs, Tissue Eng. Part. A 20(13–14) (2014), 1827–1840. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0500.