Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-5
Numerical simulation of dielectrophoretic separation of live/dead cells using a three-dimensional nonuniform AC electric field in micro-fabricated devices
BACKGROUND: The analysis of cell separation has many important biological and medical applications. Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is one of the most effective and widely used techniques for separating and identifying biological species.
OBJECTIVE: In the present study, a DEP flow channel, a device that exploits the differences in the dielectric properties of cells in cell separation, was numerically simulated and its cell-separation performance examined.
METHODS: The samples of cells used in the simulation were modeled as human leukocyte (B cell) live and dead cells. The cell-separation analysis was carried out for a flow channel equipped with a planar electrode on the channel’s top face and a pair of interdigitated counter electrodes on the bottom. This yielded a three-dimensional (3D) nonuniform AC electric field in the entire space of the flow channel.
RESULTS: To investigate the optimal separation conditions for mixtures of live and dead cells, the strength of the applied electric field was varied. With appropriately selected conditions, the device was predicted to be very effective at separating dead cells from live cells.
CONCLUSIONS: The major advantage of the proposed method is that a large volume of sample can be processed rapidly because of a large spacing of the channel height.
DemircanYÖzgürEKülahH. Dielectrophoresis: Applications and future outlook in point of care. Electrophoresis. 2013;34:1008–1027.
2.
KhoshmaneshKNahavandiSBaratchiSMitchellAKalantar-zadehK. Dielectrophoretic platforms for bio-microfluidic systems. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26:1800–1814.
3.
KarimiAYazdiSArdekaniAM. Hydrodynamic mechanisms of cell and particle trapping in microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics. 2013;7:021501.
4.
HultgrenATanaseMChenCSMeyerGJReichDH. Cell manipulation using magnetic nanowires. J Appl Phys. 2003;93:7554–7556.
5.
GrayDSTanJLVoldmanJChenCS. Dielectrophoretic registration of living cells to a microelectrode array. Biosens Bioelectron. 2004;19:1765–1774.
6.
LeuTSLiaoZF. Separating plasma and blood cells by dielectrophoresis in microfluidic chips. Intl J Mod Phys Conf Ser. 2012;19:185–189.
7.
HungSHHuangSCLeeGB. Numerical simulation of optically-induced dielectrophoresis using a voltage-transformation-ratio model. Sensors. 2013;13:1965–1983.
8.
PethigR. Dielectrophoresis: Status of the theory, technology, and applications. Biomicrofluidics. 2010;4:022811.
9.
GascoynePRCVykoukalJV. Dielectrophoresis-based sample handling in general-purpose programmable diagnostic instruments. P IEEE. 2004;92:22–42.
10.
GascoynePRCWangXBHuangYBeckerFF. Dielectrophoretic separation of cancer cells from blood. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 1997;33:670–678.
11.
LiHBashirR. Dielectrophoretic separation and manipulation of live and heat-treated cells of Listeria on microfabricated devices with interdigitated electrodes. Sensors Actuators B. 2002;86:215–221.
12.
HensleeEASanoMBRojasADSchmelzEMDavalosRV. Selective concentration of human cancer cells using contactless dielectrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2011;32:2523–2529.
13.
PatelSShowersDVedantamPTzengTRQianSXuanX. Microfluidic separation of live and dead yeast cells using reservoir-based dielectrophoresis. Biomicrofluidics. 2012;6:034102.
14.
ShafieeHSanoMBHensleeEACaldwellJLDavalosRV. Selective isolation of live/dead cells using contactless dielectrophoresis (cDEP). Lab Chip. 2010;10:438–445.
15.
ShimSStemke-HaleKTsimberidouAMNoshariJAndersonTEGascoynePRC. Antibody-independent isolation of circulating tumor cells by continuous-flow dielectrophoresis. Biomicrofluidics. 2013;7:011807.
16.
KangYLiDKalamsSAEidJE. DC-dielectrophoretic separation of biological cells by size. Biomed Microdevices. 2008;10:243–249.
17.
GielenFPereiraFdeMelloAJEdelJB. High-resolution local imaging of temperature in dielectrophoretic platforms. Anal Chem. 2010;82:7509–7514.
18.
JonesTB. Electromechanics of particles. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press; 1995. p. 34–48.
19.
MonroeJGCambierJC. Sorting of B lymphoblasts based upon cell diameter provides cell populations enriched in different stages of cell cycle. J Immunol Methods. 1983;63:45–56.
20.
OhtaAT. Optofluidic devices for cell, microparticle, and nanoparticle manipulation [PhD thesis]. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 2008.
21.
SchlichtingH. Boundary-layer theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979. p. 185–187.
22.
BrüngerABrooksCLIIIKarplusM. Stochastic boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations of ST2. Chem Phys Lett. 1984;105:495–500.
23.
TadaSNatsuyaTTsukamotoASantoY. Contactless cell trapping by the use of a uniform AC electric field. Biorheol. 2013;50:283–303.
24.
QiuZYMarkarianNKhusidBAcrivosA. Positive dielectrophoresis and heterogeneous aggregation in high-gradient AC electric fields. J Appl Phys. 2002;92:2829–2843.
25.
KumarAKhusidBQiuZYAcrivosA. New electric-field-driven mesoscale phase transitions in polarized suspensions. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95:258301.
