The purpose of this study was to evaluate, revise, and extend the Informed Consent Ontology (ICO) for expressing clinical permissions, including reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data. This study followed a formative evaluation design and used a bottom-up modeling approach. Data were collected from the literature on US federal regulations and a study of clinical consent forms. Eleven federal regulations and fifteen permission-sentences from clinical consent forms were iteratively modeled to identify entities and their relationships, followed by community reflection and negotiation based on a series of predetermined evaluation questions. ICO included fifty-two classes and twelve object properties necessary when modeling, demonstrating appropriateness of extending ICO for the clinical domain. Twenty-six additional classes were imported into ICO from other ontologies, and twelve new classes were recommended for development. This work addresses a critical gap in formally representing permissions clinical permissions, including reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data. It makes missing content available to the OBO Foundry, enabling use alongside other widely-adopted biomedical ontologies. ICO serves as a machine-interpretable and interoperable tool for responsible reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data at scale.
21st Century Cures Act, Pub. L. No. 114-255, 130 Stat. 1049 (2016).
2.
American Medical Informatics Association (2020). Clinical Research Informatics. AMIA. https://www.amia.org/applications-informatics/clinical-research-informatics.
3.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §12111 et seq.
4.
An Overview of the Common Core Ontologies (2019). /paper/An-Overview-of-the-Common-Core-Ontologies/ecac54098980b853f7558572247336084f6fdf3b.
5.
Arp, R., Smith, B. & Spear, A.D. (2015). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. MIT Press.
6.
Ashburner, M. & Schriml, L.M. (2020). Gazetteer. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/gaz.owl.
7.
Balhoff, J. (2017). Tailoring the NCI thesaurus for use in the OBO library. ICBO. https://compasify.com/paper/Tailoring-the-NCI-Thesaurus-for-Use-in-The-OBO-Library.p-2b07a50776436851e72692a58c90c8e2727f356a.
8.
Bandrowski, A., Brinkman, R., Brochhausen, M., Brush, M.H., Bug, B., Chibucos, M.C., Clancy, K., Courtot, M., Derom, D., Dumontier, M., Fan, L., Fostel, J., Fragoso, G., Gibson, F., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Haendel, M.A., He, Y., Heiskanen, M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., et al. (2016). The ontology for biomedical investigations. PloS One, 11(4), e0154556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154556.
9.
Batchelor, C. (2020). Chemical Methods Ontology. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/chmo.owl.
10.
Brochhausen, M., Zheng, J., Birtwell, D., Williams, H., Masci, A.M., Ellis, H.J. & Stoeckert, C.J. (2016). OBIB – A novel ontology for biobanking. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 7(1), 23. doi:10.1186/s13326-016-0068-y.
11.
Burton-Jones, A., Storey, V.C., Sugumaran, V. & Ahluwalia, P. (2005). A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55(1), 84–102. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2004.11.010.
12.
Buttigieg, P.L., Jensen, M., Walls, R.L. & Mungall, C.J. (2016). Environmental semantics for sustainable development in an interconnected biosphere. In International Conference on Biomedical Ontology and BioCreative (ICBO BioCreative 2016). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1747/IT201_ICBO2016.pdf.
13.
Ceusters, W. (2012). An information artifact ontology perspective on data collections and associated representational artifacts. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 180, 68–72.
14.
Ceusters, W. & Smith, B. (2015). Aboutness: Towards foundations for the information artifact ontology. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO). (pp. 1–5, Vol. 1515). CEUR.
Côté, R.G., Jones, P., Apweiler, R. & Hermjakob, H. (2006). The ontology lookup service, a lightweight cross-platform tool for controlled vocabulary queries. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(1), 97. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-97.
17.
de Matos, P., Alcántara, R., Dekker, A., Ennis, M., Hastings, J., Haug, K., Spiteri, I., Turner, S. & Steinbeck, C. (2010). Chemical entities of biological interest: An update. Nucleic Acids Research, 38(suppl_1), D249–D254. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp886.
18.
Diehl, A.D., Meehan, T.F., Bradford, Y.M., Brush, M.H., Dahdul, W.M., Dougall, D.S., He, Y., Osumi-Sutherland, D., Ruttenberg, A., Sarntivijai, S., Van Slyke, C.E., Vasilevsky, N.A., Haendel, M.A., Blake, J.A. & Mungall, C.J. (2016). The cell ontology 2016: Enhanced content, modularization, and ontology interoperability. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 7(1), 44. doi:10.1186/s13326-016-0088-7.
19.
Dumontier, M., Baker, C.J., Baran, J., Callahan, A., Chepelev, L., Cruz-Toledo, J., Del Rio, N.R., Duck, G., Furlong, L.I., Keath, N., Klassen, D., McCusker, J.P., Queralt-Rosinach, N., Samwald, M., Villanueva-Rosales, N., Wilkinson, M.D. & Hoehndorf, R. (2014). The semanticscience integrated ontology (SIO) for biomedical research and knowledge discovery. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5(1), 14. doi:10.1186/2041-1480-5-14.
20.
Dyke, S.O.M., Philippakis, A.A., Rambla De Argila, J., Paltoo, D.N., Luetkemeier, E.S., Knoppers, B.M., Brookes, A.J., Spalding, J.D., Thompson, M., Roos, M., Boycott, K.M., Brudno, M., Hurles, M., Rehm, H.L., Matern, A., Fiume, M. & Sherry, S.T. (2016). Consent codes: Upholding standard data use conditions. PLOS Genetics, 12(1), e1005772. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005772.
21.
Eklund, N., Andrianarisoa, N.H., van Enckevort, E., Anton, G., Debucquoy, A., Müller, H., Zaharenko, L., Engels, C., Ebert, L., Neumann, M., Geeraert, J., T’Joen, V., Demski, H., Caboux, É., Proynova, R., Parodi, B., Mate, S., van Iperen, E., Merino-Martinez, R., et al. (2020). Extending the minimum information about BIobank data sharing terminology to describe samples, sample donors, and events. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 18(3), 155–164. doi:10.1089/bio.2019.0129.
22.
Federhen, S. (2012). The NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(Database issue), D136–D143. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1178.
23.
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-85, 121 Stat. 823 (2007).
24.
Freimuth, R.R., Freund, E.T., Schick, L., Sharma, M.K., Stafford, G.A., Suzek, B.E., Hernandez, J., Hipp, J., Kelley, J.M., Rokicki, K., Pan, S., Buckler, A., Stokes, T.H., Fernandez, A., Fore, I., Buetow, K.H. & Klemm, J.D. (2012). Life sciences domain analysis model. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(6), 1095–1102. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000763.
25.
Friedman, C.P. & Wyatt, J.C. (2006). Evaluation as a field. In Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics (2nd ed.). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2685-5.
26.
Gelernter, J. & Jha, J. (2016). Challenges in ontology evaluation. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 7(3), 1–4. doi:10.1145/2935751.
27.
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-223, 122 Stat. 881 (2008).
28.
Gkoutos, G.V., Schofield, P.N. & Hoehndorf, R. (2012). The units ontology: A tool for integrating units of measurement in science. Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2012, bas033. doi:10.1093/database/bas033.
29.
Harris, M.R., Langford, L.H., Miller, H., Hook, M., Dykes, P.C. & Matney, S.A. (2015). Harmonizing and extending standards from a domain-specific and bottom-up approach: An example from development through use in clinical applications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 22(3), 545–552. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocu020.
30.
He, Y. (2020). Informed consent ontology [OWL]. ICO-ontology. https://github.com/ICO-ontology/ICO. (Original work published 2015).
31.
He, Y., Sarntivijai, S., Lin, Y., Xiang, Z., Guo, A., Zhang, S., Jagannathan, D., Toldo, L., Tao, C. & Smith, B. (2014). OAE: The ontology of adverse events. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5, 29. doi:10.1186/2041-1480-5-29.
32.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).
33.
Hicks, A., Hanna, J., Welch, D., Brochhausen, M. & Hogan, W.R. (2016). The ontology of medically related social entities: Recent developments. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 7(1), 47. doi:10.1186/s13326-016-0087-8.
34.
Hogan, W.R., Diller, M. & Hicks, A. (2016). Graphical entity ontology. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/geo.owl.
35.
Huntley, R.P., Harris, M.A., Alam-Faruque, Y., Blake, J.A., Carbon, S., Dietze, H., Dimmer, E.C., Foulger, R.E., Hill, D.P., Khodiyar, V.K., Lock, A., Lomax, J., Lovering, R.C., Mutowo-Meullenet, P., Sawford, T., Van Auken, K., Wood, V. & Mungall, C.J. (2014). A method for increasing expressivity of gene ontology annotations using a compositional approach. BMC Bioinformatics, 15(1), 155. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-155.
36.
Jackson, R.C., Balhoff, J.P., Douglass, E., Harris, N.L., Mungall, C.J. & Overton, J.A. (2019). ROBOT: A tool for automating ontology workflows. BMC Bioinformatics, 20(1), 407. doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3002-3.
37.
Kibbe, W.A., Arze, C., Felix, V., Mitraka, E., Bolton, E., Fu, G., Mungall, C.J., Binder, J.X., Malone, J., Vasant, D., Parkinson, H. & Schriml, L.M. (2015). Disease ontology 2015 update: An expanded and updated database of human diseases for linking biomedical knowledge through disease data. Nucleic Acids Research, 43(Database issue), D1071–D1078. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1011.
38.
Kock-Schoppenhauer, A.-K., Kamann, C., Ulrich, H., Duhm-Harbeck, P. & Ingenerf, J. (2017). Linked Data Applications Through Ontology Based Data Access in Clinical Research. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (pp. 131–135). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-753-5-131.
39.
Lin, Y., Harris, M.R., Manion, F.J., Eisenhauer, E., Zhao, B., Shi, W., Karnovsky, A. & He, Y. (2014). Development of a BFO-based informed consent ontology (ICO). In ICBO Conference Proceedings. International Conference on Biomedical Ontology.
Mungall, C.J., Vasilevsky, N., Matentzoglu, N., Osumi-Sutherland, D., Dahdul, W., Balhoff, J., Robb, S., Haendel, M., Buttigieg, P.L., Köhler, S., Clare72, Harris, M., Meier, A., Hoehndorf, R., Euniceyi, Gkoutos, G., Walls, R. & Bellow, S. pato-ontology/pato: V2020-08-02. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3970080.
42.
Neuhaus, F., Ray, S. & Sriram, R.D. (2014). Toward Ontology Evaluation Across the Life Cycle (NIST IR 8008). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
43.
Norlin, L., Fransson, M.N., Eriksson, M., Merino-Martinez, R., Anderberg, M., Kurtovic, S. & Litton, J.-E. (2012). A minimum data set for sharing biobank samples, information, and data: MIABIS. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 10(4), 343–348. doi:10.1089/bio.2012.0003.
44.
Noy, N.F. & Rubin, D.L. (2008). Translating the foundational model of anatomy into OWL. Web Semantics (Online), 6(2), 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.12.001.
45.
OBO Foundry (2020). Principles: Overview. The OBO Foundry. http://www.obofoundry.org/principles/fp-000-summary.html.
46.
Obrst, L., Ceusters, W., Mani, I., Ray, S. & Smith, B. (2007). The evaluation of ontologies. In C.J.O.Baker and K.-H.Cheung (Eds.), Semantic Web (pp. 139–158). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-48438-9_8.
47.
Ong, E., Xiang, Z., Zhao, B., Liu, Y., Lin, Y., Zheng, J., Mungall, C.J., Courtot, M., Ruttenberg, A. & He, Y. (2017). Ontobee: A linked ontology data server to support ontology term dereferencing, linkage, query and integration. Nucleic Acids Research, 45(D1), D347–D352. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw918.
48.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 36, and 42 U.S.C.).
49.
Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. §46 (2019).
50.
Public Health Services Act §301, 42 U.S.C. §241 (2019).
51.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 355 (1973).
52.
Scheuermann, R.H., Ceusters, W. & Smith, B. (2009). Toward an ontological treatment of disease and diagnosis. Summit on Translational Bioinformatics, 2009, 116–120.
53.
Schleyer, T., Spallek, H. & Hernández, P. (2007). A qualitative investigation of the content of dental paper-based and computer-based patient record formats. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(4), 515–526. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2335.
54.
Shang, N., Weng, C. & Hripcsak, G. (2018). A conceptual framework for evaluating data suitability for observational studies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(3), 248–258. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx095.
55.
Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L.J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., The OBI Consortium, Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S.-A., Scheuermann, R.H., Shah, N., Whetzel, P.L. & Lewis, S. (2007). The OBO Foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology, 25(11), 1251–1255. doi:10.1038/nbt1346.
56.
The Gene Ontology Consortium (2019). The gene ontology resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D330–D338. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1055.
57.
The Joint Commission, Division of Healthcare Improvement (2016). Informed Consent: More than getting a Signature (Issue 21; Quick Safety). The Joint Commission. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/joint-commission-online/quick_safety_issue_twenty-one_february_2016pdf.pdf?db=web&hash=5944307ED39088503A008A70D2C768AA.
58.
Torniai, C., Brush, M., Vasilevsky, N., Segerdell, E., Wilson, M., Johnson, T., Corday, K., Shaffer, C. & Haendel, M. (2011). Developing an application ontology for biomedical resource annotation and retrieval: Challenges and lessons learned. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 833, 101–108. https://ohsu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/developing-an-application-ontology-for-biomedical-resource-annota-2.
59.
Umberfield, E.E., Jiang, Y., Fenton, S.H., Stansbury, C., Ford, K., Crist, K., Kardia, S.L.R., Thomer, A.K. & Harris, M.R. (2021a). Lessons learned for identifying and annotating permissions in clinical consent forms. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(3), 429–435. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1730032.
60.
Umberfield, E.E., Kardia, S.L.R., Jiang, Y., Thomer, A.K. & Harris, M.R. (2021b). Regulations and norms for reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data. Western Journal of Nursing Research. doi:10.1177/01939459211029296.
61.
Umberfield, E.E., Stansbury, C., Ford, K., Jiang, Y., Kardia, S.L.R., Thomer, A.K. & Harris, M.R. (2021c). Appendices for article: “Evaluating and extending the Informed Consent Ontology for representing permissions from the clinical domain.”. doi:10.7302/3709.
62.
Utecht, J., Ball, J., Bowman, S.M., Dodd, J., Judkins, J., Maxson, R.T., Nabaweesi, R., Pradhan, R., Sanddal, N.D., Winchell, R.J. & Brochhausen, M. (2019). Development and validation of a controlled vocabulary: An OWL representation of organizational structures of trauma centers and trauma systems. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 264, 403–407. doi:10.3233/SHTI190252.
63.
Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A.J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C.T., Finkers, R., et al. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
64.
Zhu, X., Fan, J.-W., Baorto, D.M., Weng, C. & Cimino, J.J. (2009). A review of auditing methods applied to the content of controlled biomedical terminologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(3), 413–425. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.03.003.
