In this paper, we present a domain-specific, open access, reference ontology (ROMAIN) for the maintenance management domain. We use a hybrid approach, based on a top-down alignment to an open source top-level ontology, the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), and a bottom up focus on classes that are grounded in maintenance practice. We constrain the scope of the ontology to the classes that are unique to the maintenance management practice, such as maintenance strategy, degradation, and work order management, rather than modeling the entire domain of maintenance. This approach reduces the scope of the development task and enables reasoning to be tested at a manageable scale. ROMAIN provides a unifying framework that can be used in conjunction with other BFO compliant sub-domain ontologies, such as planning and scheduling ontologies. The proposed ontology is validated using real-life data in the context of a use case related to evaluating the effectiveness of maintenance strategy.
Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T., Johannesson, P., Gordijn, J., Grégoire, B., Schmitt, M., Dubois, E., Abels, S., et al. (2006). Towards a reference ontology for business models. In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (pp. 482–496). Springer.
2.
Arnold, P. & Rahm, E. (2014). Enriching ontology mappings with semantic relations. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 93, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2014.07.001.
3.
Arp, R., Smith, B. & Spear, A. (2015). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
4.
Arpirez, J., Gómez-Pérez, A., Lozano, A. & Pinto, H.S. (1998). 2Agent: An ontology-based WWW broker to select ontologies. In Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and PSMs, Brighton, England.
5.
Batres, R., Fujihara, S., Shimada, Y. & Fuchino, T. (2014). The use of ontologies for enhancing the use of accident information. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(2), 119–130. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2012.11.002.
6.
Batres, R., West, M., Leal, D., Price, D., Masaki, K., Shimada, Y., Fuchino, T. & Naka, Y. (2007). An upper ontology based on ISO 15926. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 31(5–6), 519–534. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.07.004.
7.
Baumgartner, N. & Retschitzegger, W. (2006). A survey of upper ontologies for situation awareness. In Proc. of the 4th IASTED International Conference on Knowledge Sharing and Collaborative Engineering, St. Thomas, US VI (1–9).
8.
Bendell, T. (1988). An overview of collection, analysis, and application of reliability data in the process industries. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 37(2), 132–137. doi:10.1109/24.3732.
9.
Ceusters, W. (2012). An information artifact ontology perspective on data collections and associated representational artifacts. In MIE (pp. 68–72).
10.
Ceusters, W., Elkin, P. & Smith, B. (2007). Negative findings in electronic health records and biomedical ontologies: A realist approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(3), 326–333. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.02.003.
CUBRC (2014). Common core ontologies for data integration. https://www.cubrc.org/index.php/data-science-and-information-fusion/ontology.
13.
Ebrahimipour, V., Rezaie, K. & Shokravi, S. (2010). An ontology approach to support FMEA studies. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 671–677. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.033.
14.
Ebrahimipour, V. & Yacout, S. (2015). Ontology-based schema to support maintenance knowledge representation with a case study of a pneumatic valve. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 45(4), 702–712. doi:10.1109/TSMC.2014.2383361.
15.
Ebrahimipour, V. & Yacout, S. (2016). Ontology Modeling in Physical Asset Integrity Management. New York: Springer.
16.
Elmhadhbi, L., Karray, M.H. & Archimede, B. (2019). Toward the use of upper level ontologies for semantically interoperable systems: An emergency management use case. In Enterprise Interoperability VIII (Vol. 9, Chapter 11). Springer.
17.
Falquet, G., Métral, C., Teller, J. & Tweed, C. (2011). Ontologies in Urban Development Projects. Springer.
18.
Galton, A. (2012). States, processes and events, and the ontology of causal relations.
Gruber, T.R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 43(5–6), 907–928. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.
21.
Grüninger, M. & Fox, M.S. (1995). The role of competency questions in enterprise engineering. In Benchmarking – Theory and Practice (pp. 22–31). Springer.
22.
Guarino, N. (2017). BFO and DOLCE: So far, so close.... COSMOS + TAXIS.
23.
Guizzardi, G. & Wagner, G. (2010). Using the unified foundational ontology (UFO) as a foundation for general conceptual modeling languages. In Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications (pp. 175–196). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_8.
24.
Hodkiewicz, M. (2018). Working towards a siri for maintenance. In Mastering SAP Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.
IEC (2016). AS IEC 60300.3.14 dependability management application guide – maintenance and maintenance support. Geneva, Switzerland.
27.
ISO (2003). ISO 15926 industrial automation systems and integration – integration of life-cycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities – part 2: Data model. Geneva, Switzerland.
28.
ISO (2012). ISO 13372 condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines – vocabulary. Geneva, Switzerland.
29.
ISO (2014). ISO 55001 asset management – management systems – requirements. Geneva, Switzerland.
30.
Karray, M.-H., Chebel-Morello, B., Lang, C. & Zerhouni, N. (2011). A component based system for s-maintenance. In Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2011 9th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 519–526). IEEE.
31.
Karray, M.H., Chebel-Morello, B. & Zerhouni, N. (2012). A formal ontology for industrial maintenance. Applied Ontology, 7(3), 269–310.
32.
Karray, M.H., Morello, B.C. & Zerhouni, N. (2010). Towards a maintenance semantic architecture. In Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management (pp. 98–111). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_12.
33.
Kelly, A. (1997). Maintenance Organization and Systems. Butterworth-Heinemann.
34.
Kelly, A. (2006). Strategic Maintenance Planning (Vol. 1). Oxford: Elsevier.
35.
Knapp, M. & Hasibether, F. (2011). Material master data quality. In Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), 2011 17th International Conference on (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
36.
Mascardi, V., Cordì, V. & Rosso, P. (2007). A comparison of upper ontologies. In Woa (Vol. 2007, pp. 55–64).
37.
Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A. & Schneider, L. (2002). The wonderweb library of foundational ontologies.
38.
Matsokis, A., Karray, H.M., Chebel-Morello, B. & Kiritsis, D. (2010). An ontology-based model for providing semantic maintenance. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 43(3), 12–17. doi:10.3182/20100701-2-PT-4012.00004.
39.
Matsokis, A. & Kiritsis, D. (2010). An ontology-based approach for product lifecycle management. Computers in Industry, 61(8), 787–797. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2010.05.007.
40.
Mazzola, L., Kapahnke, P., Vujic, M. & Klusch, M. (2016). CDM-core: A manufacturing domain ontology in OWL2 for production and maintenance. In KEOD (pp. 136–143).
41.
Mizoguchi, R. (2010). YAMATO: Yet another more advanced top-level ontology. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Ontology Workshop (pp. 1–16).
42.
Morello, B., Karray, M. & Zerhouni, N. (2010). New persepctives of maintenance systems: Towards S-maintenance. Proceedings from the IMS2020 Summer School on Sustainable Manufacturing, 26, 223–236.
43.
Moubray, J. (2007). Reliability-Centered Maintenance RCM II (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
44.
Noy, N.F. (2004). Semantic integration: A survey of ontology-based approaches. ACM Sigmod Record, 33(4), 65–70. doi:10.1145/1041410.1041421.
45.
Otte, J.N., Rudnicki, R. & Smith, B. (2018). Final Report for Coordinated Holistic Alignment of Manufacturing Processes (CHAMP). New York: University of Buffalo.
46.
Palmer, D. (1999). Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Handbook. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.
47.
Pease, A. (2006). Formal representation of concepts: The suggested upper merged ontology and its use in linguistics. In Ontolinguistics. How Ontological Status Shapes the Linguistic Coding of Concepts.
48.
Reiman, T. & Oedewald, P. (2004). Measuring maintenance culture and maintenance core task with CULTURE-questionnaire – a case study in the power industry. Safety Science, 42(9), 859–889. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2004.04.001.
49.
Ruiz, F., Vizcaíno, A., Piattini, M. & García, F. (2004). An ontology for the management of software maintenance projects. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 14(03), 323–349. doi:10.1142/S0218194004001646.
50.
SAE (2011). SAE JA1012 a guide to the reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) standard. London.
51.
Semy, S.K., Pulvermacher, M.K. & Obrst, L.J. (2004). Toward the use of an upper ontology for U.S. Government and U.S. Military domains: An evaluation military domains: An evaluation.
52.
Simperl, E.P.B., Mochol, M. & Bürger, T. (2010). Achieving maturity: The state of practice in ontology engineering in 2009. IJCSA, 7(1), 45–65.
53.
Smith, B. (2006). Against idiosyncrasy in ontology development. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 150, 15.
54.
Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L.J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., et al. (2007). The OBO foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology, 25(11), 1251. doi:10.1038/nbt1346.
55.
Smith, B. & Ceusters, W. (2010). Ontological realism: A methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Applied Ontology, 5(3–4), 139–188.
56.
SMRP (2009). SMRP Best Practice – Maintenance |& Reliability Body of Knowledge (5th ed.). Atlanta, GA: Society of Maintenance and Reliability Professionals.
57.
Stevenson, G., Knox, S., Dobson, S. & Nixon, P. (2009). Ontonym: A collection of upper ontologies for developing pervasive systems. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies (p. 9). ACM.
58.
Stuber, A. (2016). The Maintenance Framework. Global Forum on Maintenance and Asset Management.
59.
Suarez-Figueroa, M.C. & Gómez-Pérez, A. (2008). First attempt towards a standard glossary of ontology engineering terminology.
