In this study, we introduce an explicit trading-volume process into the Almgren–Chriss model, which is a standard model for optimal execution. We propose a penalization method for deriving a verification theorem for an adaptive optimization problem. We also discuss the optimality of the volume-weighted average-price strategy of a risk-neutral trader. Moreover, we derive a second-order asymptotic expansion of the optimal strategy and verify its accuracy numerically.
AlfonsiA., FruthA., SchiedA., 2010. Optimal execution strategies in limit order books with general shape functions, Quantitative Finance10(2), 143–157.
2.
AlfonsiA., SchiedA., SlynkoA., 2012. Order book resilience, price manipulation, and the positive portfolio problem, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics3(1), 511–533.
3.
AlmgrenR., ChrissN., 2000. Optimal execution of portfolio transactions, Journal of Risk18(2), 57–62.
4.
AlmgrenR., ThumC., HauptmannE., LiH., 2005a. Direct estimation of equity market impact. Preprint.
AnéT., GemanH., 2000. Order flow, transaction clock, and normality of asset returns, The Journal of Finance55(5), 2259–2284.
7.
BertsimasD., LoA.W., 1998. Optimal control of execution costs, Journal of Financial Markets1(1), 1–50.
8.
ChengX., GiacintoM.D., WangT.-H., 2017. Optimal execution with uncertain order fills in the Almgren–Chriss framework, Quantitative Finance17(1), 55–69.
9.
FreiC., WestrayN., 2013. Optimal execution of a VWAP order: A stochastic control approach, Mathematical Finance25(3), 612–639.
10.
GatheralJ., 2010. No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact, Quantitative Finance10(7), 749–759.
11.
GatheralJ., SchiedA., 2011. Optimal trade execution under geometric Brownian motion in the Almgren and Chriss framework, International Journal on Theoretical and Applied Finance14(3), 353–368.
12.
GatheralJ., SchiedA., 2013. Dynamical models of market impact and algorithms for order execution. In: FouqueJ., LangsamJ., ed., Handbook on Systemic Risk, Cambridge, New York, pp. 579–602.
13.
GemanH., 2008. Stochastic clock and financial markets. In: YorM. ed., Asects of Mathematical Finance, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 37–52.
14.
GuéantO., 2014. Permanent market impact can be nonlinear. Preprint.
15.
GuéantO., RoyerG., 2014. VWAP execution and guaranteed VWAP, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics5(1), 445–471.
16.
HolthausenR.W., LeftwichR.W., MayersD., 1987. The effect of large block transactions on security prices: A cross-sectional analysis, Journal of Financial Economics19(2), 237–267.
17.
KatoT., 2011. An optimal execution problem with a geometric Ornstein–Uhlenbeck price process. Preprint.
18.
KatoT., 2014a. An optimal execution problem with market impact, Finance and Stochastics18(3), 695–732.
19.
KatoT., 2014b. Non-linearity of market impact functions: Empirical and simulation-based studies on convex/concave market impact functions and derivation of an optimal execution model, Transactions of the Japan Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics24(3), 203–237(in Japanese).
20.
KatoT., 2015. VWAP execution as an optimal strategy, JSIAM Letters7, 33–36.
21.
KatoT., 2016. Optimality of VWAP execution strategies under general shaped market impact functions. Preprint.
22.
KatoT., 2017. An optimal execution problem with S-shaped market impact functions, Communications on Stochastic Analysis11(3), 265–285.
23.
KatoT., OgiharaT., TakadaH., 2014. Empirical analysis of limit order books and power laws in financial markets. RIMS Kokyuroku, Financial Modeling and Analysis (FMA2014) 1933, pp. 44–69 (in Japanese).
24.
KonishiH., 2002. Optimal slice of a VWAP trade, Journal of Financial Markets5(2), pp. 197–221.
