Abstract
Auday, M., see Bodanza, G. (1) 1– 34
Becker, M., A. Palmer and A. Frank, Semantic clause types and modality as features for argument analysis (2) 95–112
Benlamine, S., see Villata, S. (1) 61– 87
Bodanza, G., F. Tohmé and M. Auday, Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks (1) 1– 34
Cabrio, E., see Villata, S. (1) 61– 87
Chaouachi, M., see Villata, S. (1) 61– 87
Chesñevar, C.I., see Deagustini, C.A.D. (1) 35– 59
Deagustini, C.A.D., S.E. Fulladoza Dalibón, S. Gottifredi, M.A. Falappa, C.I. Chesñevar and G.R. Simari, Defeasible argumentation over relational databases (1) 35– 59
Di Marco, C., see Harris, R.A. (3) 211–231
Draief, M., see Riveret, R. (1) 89– 89
El-Assady, M., see Hautli-Janisz, A. (2) 153–174
Falappa, M.A., see Deagustini, C.A.D. (1) 35– 59
Fetzer, A., see Hofmockel, C. (2) 131–151
Frank, A., see Becker, M. (2) 95–112
Frasson, C., see Villata, S. (1) 61– 87
Fulladoza Dalibón, S.E., see Deagustini, C.A.D. (1) 35– 59
Gandon, F., see Villata, S. (1) 61– 87
Gottifredi, S., see Deagustini, C.A.D. (1) 35– 59
Handschuh, S., see Mitrović, J. (3) 267–287
Harris, R.A. and C. Di Marco, Guest Editorial. Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation (3) 211–231
Hautli-Janisz, A. and M. El-Assady, Rhetorical strategies in German argumentative dialogs (2) 153–174
Hofmockel, C., A. Fetzer and R.M. Maier, Discourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse (2) 131–151
Jraidi, I., see Villata, S. (1) 61– 87
Korkinof, D., see Riveret, R. (1) 89– 89
Lawrence, J., J. Visser and C. Reed, Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining (3) 289–310
Maier, R.M., see Hofmockel, C. (2) 131–151
Mehlenbacher, A.R., Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite (3) 233–252
Mitrović, J., C. O’Reilly, M. Mladenović and S. Handschuh, Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining (3) 267–287
Mladenović, M., see Mitrović, J. (3) 267–287
Musi, E. and A. Rocci, Evidently epistential adverbs are argumentative indicators: A corpus-based study (2) 175–192
O’Reilly, C., see Mitrović, J. (3) 267–287
Palmer, A., see Becker, M. (2) 95–112
Pitt, J., see Riveret, R. (1) 89– 89
Razuvayevskaya, O. and S. Teufel, Finding enthymemes in real-world texts: A feasibility study (2) 113–129
Reed, C., see Lawrence, J. (3) 289–310
Riveret, R., D. Korkinof, M. Draief and J. Pitt, Erratum. Probabilistic abstract argumentation: An investigation with Boltzmann machines (1) 89– 89
Rocci, A., see Musi, E. (2) 175–192
Saint-Dizier, P., Knowledge-driven argument mining based on the qualia structure (2) 193–210
Saint-Dizier, P. and M. Stede, Guest Editorial. Special issue: Foundations of the language of argumentation (2) 91– 93
Simari, G.R., see Deagustini, C.A.D. (1) 35– 59
Stede, M., see Saint-Dizier, P. (2) 91– 93
Teufel, S., see Razuvayevskaya, O. (2) 113–129
Tohmé, F., see Bodanza, G. (1) 1– 34
Villata, S., E. Cabrio, I. Jraidi, S. Benlamine, M. Chaouachi, C. Frasson and F. Gandon, Emotions and personality traits in argumentation: An empirical evaluation (1) 61– 87
Visser, J., see Lawrence, J. (3) 289–310
Yuan, Y., The argumentative litotes in The Analects (3) 253–266