New agricultural technologies are often justified morally in terms of their expected benefits, e.g., feeding the world's hungry. Such justifications stand or fall, not only on whether such benefits are indeed forthcoming, but on whether or not they are outweighed by attendant dangers. The practical details of easch case are, therefore, all-important. In this paper agriculture and aquaculture are examined from the perspective of ecosystem integrity, and with further reference to the uncertain effects of anthropogenic changes in the earth's atmosphere. The principle of integrity provides a strong justification for a cautious approach to new technologies, and particularly so in the case of transgenics.
BeveridgeLindsay M. M., RossG. and KellyL.1994. ‘Aquaculture and Biodiversity’, Ambio23(8): 497–502.
2.
CaldwellM., TeramuraA. et al. 1995. ‘Effects of Increased Solar Ultraviolet Radiation on Terrestrial Plants’, Ambio24(3): 166–173.
3.
Costa-PierceBarry A., and PetersH.T.1994. ‘Environmental Impacts of Nutrients Discharged from Aquaculture: Towards the Evolution of Sustainable, Ecological Aquaculture Systems’. Presented June 21, Plenary Talk, Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
4.
DraperE.1991. Risky Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
FuntowiczS.O. and RavetzJ.R.1993. ‘Science for the Post-Normal Age’, Futures, September 1993: 739–755.
6.
GoodlandRobert and DalyHerman1993. ‘Why Northern Income Growth is Not the Solution to Southern Poverty’, The World Bank Environment Department Divisional Working Paper, No. 1993–43.
7.
GoodlandRobert1994. ‘Environmental Sustainability and the Power Sector-Part I: The Concept of Sustainability’. Impact Assessment12(3): 275–304.
8.
HäderDanat-P., WorrestR.C. et al. 1995. ‘Effects of Increased Solar Ultraviolet Radiation on Aquatic Ecosystem’, Ambio24(3): 174–180.
9.
HutchingsJ.A. and MyersR.A.1994. ‘What Can be Learned from The Collapse of a Renewable Resource?’ Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science51: 2126–2146.
10.
KapuscinskiA.R. and HallermanE.N.1994. ‘Benefits, Environmental Risks, Social Concerns, and Policy Implications of Biotechnology in Aquaculture’. Office of Technology Assessment, Background Paper No. PB96-107586.
11.
KarrJames R.1994. ‘Landscapes and Management for Ecological Integrity’. In Biodiversity and Landscape: a Paradox of Humanity. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–249.
12.
KayJames J. and SchneiderE.1994. ‘The Challenge of the Ecosystem Approach’, Alternatives20(30): 1–6.
13.
KendallHenry and PimentelDavid1994. ‘Expansion of the Global food Supply’, Ambio23(3).
14.
MayenoA.N. and GleichG.J.1994. ‘Eosinophilia-myalgia Syndrome and Tryptophan Production: A Cautionary Tale’, 12-TIBTECH 346-52.
15.
McMichaelA.J.1995. Science, 267(Feb. 17): 957.
16.
MeadowsD.H., MeadowsD.L. and RandersJ.1992. Beyond the Limits. Post Mills, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
17.
MellonMargaret1994a. ‘Comments on Discussion Paper on Food Labelling and Biotechnology’, Union of Concerned Scientists, October 13.
18.
MellonMargaret1994b. ‘Comments to the Joint Meeting of the Food and Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee’, Union of Concerned Scientists, November 2.
19.
National Wildlife Federation1992. ‘Fact Sheet on “Tryptophan”’, National Wildlife Federation Biotechnology Policy Center, June.
20.
NortonB.G.1992. ‘A New Paradigm for Environmental Management’, in CostanzaR., NortonB.G., and HaskellB.D. (eds) Ecosystem Health. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
21.
PimentelD. et. al., 1991. ‘Environmental and Economic Effects of Reducing Pesticide Use’, Bioscience41(6).
PimentelD. et al. 1995. ‘Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits’, Science, Feb. 24: 1, 117–1, 123.
24.
RisslerJane and MellonMargaret1993. “‘Perils Amidst the Promise”, Ecological Risks of Transgenic Crops in a Global Market’. Cambridge, MA: The Union of Concerned Scientists, December.
25.
SagoffM.1988. ‘Biotechnology and the Environment: What is at Risk?’ Agriculture and Human Values5: 26–35.
26.
Shrader-FrechetteK.1991. Risk and Rationality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
SouléM.1995. ‘Health Implications of Global Warming and the Onslaught of Alien Species’, Wild Earth, Summer: 56–61.
28.
USDA1995. Final Draft – Performance Standards for Safety Conducting Research with Genetically Modified Fish and Shellfish. Document No. 95-0l, April 15, 1995. Prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Biotechnology Research Advisory Committee, Working Group on Aquatic Biotechnology and Environmental Safety.
29.
WestraL.1993. ‘A Transgenic Dinner? Social and Ethical Issues in Biotechnology and Agriculture’, Journal of Social Philosophy24(3): 215–232.
30.
WestraL., 1994a. An Environmental Proposal For Ethics: The Principle of Integrity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
31.
WestraL.1994b. ‘Biodiversity and Food Production: The Perspective of Ecosystem Integrity’. Read at the AAAS meeting, Feb. 11.
32.
WestraL., 1994c. ‘Paul Shepard's “The Wild” and Biocentric Holism: A Convergence of Ends’. In OehlschlagerMax (ed.) Nature's Odyssey (Essays in Honour of Paul Shepard). Durango, Co.: Kivaki Press.
33.
WestraL., 1994d. ‘Risky Business: Corporate Responsibility and Hazardous Products’, Business Ethics Quarterly4(1): 97–110.
34.
WestraL., 1995a. ‘Ecosystem Integrity and Sustainability: The Foundational Value of The Wild’, in WestraL. and LemonsJ. (eds) Ethical and Scientific Perspectives in Integrity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35.
WestraL.1995b. ‘Buffer Zones to Protect Wilderness’, in Arctic Wilderness: The 5th World Wilderness Congress, pp. 286–287.
36.
WestraL., BowenK. and BeheB.1991. ‘Agricultural Practices, Ecology and Ethics in The Third World’, The Journal of Agricultural Ethics4(10): 60–77.
