If valuation processes are dualistic in the sense that ethical values are given priority over instrumental values, and if old-growth forests are considered to be valuable in their own right, then the cost-benefits approach to valuing old growth is inappropriate. If this is the case, then ethical standards must be used to determine whether preservation is the correct policy when human material needs and ecosystem preservation are in conflict. Such a standard is suggested and evaluated in the context of the policy debate over the preservation of spotted owl habitat in the Pacific Northwest region of the U.S.
BeuterJohn H.1990. ‘Social and Economic Impacts in Washington, Oregon and California Associated with Implementing the Conservation Strategy for the Northern Spotted Owl: An Overview.’ Portland, Or.: Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc.
2.
BluestoneBarry and BennettHarrison1982. The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry. New York: Basic Books.
3.
BoothDouglas E.1994. Valuing Nature: The Decline and Preservation of Old-Growth Forests. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
4.
BoothDouglas E.1992. ‘The Economics and Ethics of Old-Growth Forests’, Environmental Ethics14: 43–62.
5.
BrookshireDavid S.; EubanksLarry S.; and SorgCindy F.1986. ‘Existence Values, and Normative Economics: Implications for Valuing Water Resources’, Water Resources Research22: 1509–18.
6.
CallicottJ. Baird1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
DowdleBarney and HankeSteven H.1985. ‘Public Timber Policy and the Wood Products Industry’, in DeaconRobert T. and JohnsonM. Bruce, Forestlands: Public and Private. San Francisco: Pacific Institute.
8.
EdwardsSteven F.1986. ‘Ethical Preferences and the Assessment of Existence Values: Does the Neoclassical Model Fit?’, Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics15: 145–50.
HagenDaniel A.; VincentJames W.; and WellePatrick G.1992. ‘Benefits of Preserving Old-Growth Forests and the Spotted Owl’, Contemporary Policy Issues10: 13–26.
14.
HarlowElizabeth M.1992. ‘The Human Face of Nature: Environmental Values and the Limits of Nonanthropocentism’, Environmental Ethics14: 27–42.
15.
KelmanSteven1981. ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique’, Regulation5: 33–40.
16.
LeopoldAldo1966. A Sand County Almanac: With Essays from Round River. New York: Ballantine Books.
17.
LippkeBruce R.1990. ‘Three State Impact of Spotted Owl Conservation and Other Timber Harvest Reductions: A Coopertive Evaluation of Economic and Social Impacts’, A Report to the United States House of Representatives, Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Forests, Farms and Energy, August 31, 1990.Seattle: University of Washington, College of Forest Resources.
18.
MaserChris1988. The Redesigned Forest. San Pedro, Ca.: R. and E. Miles.
19.
MeadWalter J.; MuraokaDennis D.; SchnieppMark; and WatsonRichard B.1990. ‘The Economic Consequences of Preserving Old Growth Timber for Spotted Owls in Oregon and Washington’, Santa Barbara: Community and Organization Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara.
20.
NortonBryan G.1991. Toward Unity among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
ReganTom1981. ‘The Nature and Possibility of an Environmental Ethic’, Environmental Ethics3: 19–34.
22.
SagoffMark1988. ‘Some Problems with Environmental Economics’, Environmental Ethics10: 55–74.
23.
Seattle Audubon Society v. Evans, 1991. 771 F. Supp. 1081 (W.D.Wash.).
24.
SenAmartya K.1977. ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs6: 317–44.
25.
StoneRichard1993. ‘Spotted Owl Plan Kindles Debate on Salvage Logging’, Science261–5119 (July 16, 1993): 287.
26.
TaylorPaul W.1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
ThomasJack Ward; ForsmanEric D.; LintJoseph B.; MeslowE. Charles; NoonBarry R.; and VernerJared1990. ‘A Conservation Strategy for the Northern Spotted Owl’. Portland, Or.: Interagency Scientific Committee to Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl.
28.
USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management1990. ‘Actions the Administration May Wish to Consider in Implementing a Conservation Strategy for the Spotted Owl.’
29.
U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Forests, Family Farms, and Energy of the Committee on Agriculture.1990. Forestry Issues in the Pacific Northwest: Hearing, 101st Congress, 2d Session, Olympia, WA, August 31, 1990. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
