The basic thesis that environmental values must spring from the economic relations of human societies is examined and it is suggested that although such connections are never absent, they do not account for the totality of values. Rather, they interact with other values in a kind of helical strand which is open-ended and self-organising. In such a context, ‘sustainability’, for example, be comes a rather time-limited idea. Our present ways of describing such evolution and interactions are also briefly examined.
AbramD.1991. ‘The mechanical and the organic: on the impact of metaphor in science’, in Scientists on Gaia, eds SchneiderS. H. and BostonP. J., pp. 66–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BergerH.1988. Second World in a Green World. Studies in Renaissance Fiction-making.Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BerlinI.1991. The Crooked Timber of Humanity. London: Fontana Books.
4.
BerlinI.1992. The Hedgehog and the Fox. An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History. London: Phoenix Press.
5.
BernsteinR.J.1992. The New Constellation. The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BoserupE.1993. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth.London: Earthscan.
7.
BurtonI. and KatesR.F.1986. ‘The great climacteric 1798–2048: the transition to a just and sustainable environment’, in idem (eds) Geography, Resources and Environment. Vol II, Themes from the Work of Gilbert F. White, pp. 339–60. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
8.
CapraF.1983. The Turning Point. Science, Society and the Rising Culture. London, Flamingo Books.
9.
CosgroveD.1990. ‘Environmental thought and action: pre-modern and post-modern’. Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersNS 15: 344–58.
10.
EliotT.S.1944. Four Quartets. London: Faber and Faber.
11.
GareA.E.1995. Postmodernism and the Environmental Crisis. London and New York: Routledge.
12.
GlackenC. J.1967. Traces on the Rhodian Shore.Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
GouldS. J.1991. Wonderful Life. The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.London: Penguin Books.
14.
GroveR. H.1990. ‘The origins of environmentalism’. Nature345: 11–14.
15.
GroveR. H.1994. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HaywardT.1994. Ecological Thought. An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
KinemanJ.J.1991. ‘Gaia: hypothesis or worldview’, in Scientists on Gaia, eds SchneiderS.H. and BostonP.J., pp. 47–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
LübbeH.1992. ‘Ökologische Probleme in kulturellen Wandel’. Natur und Wissenschaften79: 485–88.
MathewsF.1991. The Ecological Self. London and New York: Routledge.
21.
OelschlagerM.1991. The Idea of Wilderness from Prehistory to the Age of Ecology.New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
22.
PepperD.1993. Eco-socialism. From Deep Ecology to Social Justice.London and New York: Routledge.
23.
PetersK.E.1987. ‘Humanity in nature: conserving yet creating’. Zygon24: 469–85.
24.
PrigogineI. and StengersI.1984. Order out of Chaos. London: Fontana Books.
25.
ReedM. and HarveyD.L.1992. ‘The new science and the old: complexity and realism in the social sciences’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour22, 353–380.
26.
RoszakT.1981. Person/Planet. The Creative Disintegration of Industrial Society.London: Paladin Books.
27.
SheperdP.1982. Nature and Madness. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
28.
SimmonsI. G.1989. Changing the Face of the Earth. Oxford: Blackwell.
29.
SmithM. R. and MarxL. (eds) 1994. Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
ThompsonW.I.1989. Imaginary Landscapes. Making Worlds of Myth and Science.New York: St Martin's Press.
31.
WynneB. and MayerS.1993 ‘How science fails the environment’, New Scientist, 5 June, 33–35.
32.
YearleyS.1991. The Green Case. A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments and Politics. London: Harper Collins.
