Ethical reasoning of all types is anthropocentric, in that it is addressed to agents, but anthropocentric starting points vary in the preference they accord the human species. Realist claims about environmental values, utilitarian reasoning and rights-based reasoning all have difficulties in according ethical concern to certain all aspects of natural world. Obligation-based reasoning can provide quite strong if incomplete reasons to protect the natural world, including individual non-human animals. Although it cannot establish all the conclusions to which anti-speciesists aspire, it may establish many of them with some clarity.
AikenWilliam1992. ‘Human Rights in an Ecological Era’. Environmental Values1: 189–203.
2.
BenthamJeremy1967. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and of Legislation, in A Fragment on Government and Introduction to the Principles of Morals and of Legislation, ed. HarrisonWilfrid. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
ClarkStephen1977. The Moral Status of Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Environmental Values, 1994, vol. 3, no. 4, special issue on Values and Preferences in Environmental Economics.
5.
GoodinRobert1992. Green Politics. Oxford: Polity Press.
6.
HaywardTim1997. ‘Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem’. Environmental Values6: 49–63.
7.
O'NeillOnora1996. Towards Justice and Virtue: A constructive account of practical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
PearceDavid, , 1989. Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan.
9.
PearceDavid, , 1991. Blueprint 2: Greening the World Economy. London: Earthscan.
