In this paper, I consider what kind of normative work might be done by speaking of ecosystems utilising a ‘medical’ vocabulary – drawing, that is, on such notions as ‘health’, ‘disease’, and ‘illness’. Some writers attracted to this mode of expression have been rather modest about what they think it might purchase. I wish to be bolder. Drawing on the idea of ‘thick’ evaluative concepts as discussed by McDowell, Williams and Taylor, and resorting to a phenomenological argument for a kind of moral realism, I argue that the project of developing a robust understanding of the moral significance of recognising the health or illness of ecosystems is definitely a starter.
BechtelWilliam1986. ‘A naturalistic concept of health’. In HumberJ. and AlmederR., (eds) Biomedical Ethics Reviews 1985, pp. 131–70. Clifton N.J.: Humana Press.
2.
BlackburnSimon1985. ‘Error and the phenomenology of value’. In HonderichT. (ed.) Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge.
3.
CallicottJ. Baird1992a. ‘Aldo Leopold's metaphor’. In CostanzaR., NortonB. and HaskellB. (eds) Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
4.
CallicottJ. Baird1992b. ‘La Nature est morte: vive la nature!’ Hastings Center Report22(5): 17–18.
5.
EngelhardtH.T.1984. ‘Clinical problems and the concept of disease’. In NordenfeltL. and LindahlB. (eds) Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine.Dordrecht: Reidel.
6.
HareR.M.1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
LovibondSabina1983. Realism and Imagination in Ethics. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
RapportDavid1992. ‘What is clinical ecology?’ In CostanzaR., NortonB. and HaskellB. (eds) Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
10.
SagoffMark1988. ‘Ethics, ecology and the environment: integrating science and the law’, Tennessee Law Review56(1): 166.
11.
SagoffMark1991. ‘Zuckerman's Dilemma: a plea for environmental ethics’, Hastings Center Report21(5): 35–6.
12.
SagoffMark1992. ‘Has nature a good of its own?’ In CostanzaR., NortonB. and
