Identifying what is wrong with the demise of wildlife requires prior identification of the human sentiment which is offended by that demise. Attempts to understand this in terms of animal rights (individual or species) and the benefits of wildlife to human beings or the wider environment are rejected. A diagnosis of this sentiment is attempted in terms of our increasing admiration, in the conditions of modernity and postmodernity, for the ‘harmony’ or ‘at homeness’ of wild animals with their environments. The diagnosis is defended against certain misunderstandings, and implications are tentatively drawn from it for environmental education and the management of wildlife.
ClarkStephen R.L.1987 “Beasts like us”, Times Literary Supplement, 20/2/87.
2.
CooperDavid E.1992 “The Idea of Environment”, in The Environment in Question, edited by CooperDavid and PalmerJoy. London, Routledge.
3.
KunderaMilan1984The Unbearable Liqhtness of Being. London, Faber & Faber.
4.
MacklinDebbie1990 “Who's hijacking conservation?” New Scientist 8/9/90.
5.
McKibbenBill1990The End of Nature. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
6.
ReganTom1984The Case for Animal Rights. London, Routledge.
7.
RegensteinLewis1985 “Animal rights, endangered species and human survival”, in In Defence of Animals, edited by SingerPeter, pp. 118–32. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
