BradyE.2013. The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BradyE.2022. ‘Global climate change and aesthetics’. Environmental Values31(1): 27–46. Crossref.
7.
Capdevila-WerningR. and LehtinenS.. 2021. ‘Intergenerational aesthetics: A future-oriented approach to aesthetic theory and practice’. Philosophical Inquiries9 (2): 175–198. Crossref.
8.
CarlsonA.2018. ‘Environmental aesthetics, ethics, and ecoaesthetics’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism76 (4): 399–410. Crossref.
9.
CiccarelliS.2014. ‘The beauty of climate change’. In Di PaolaM. and PellegrinoG. (eds), Canned Heat. Ethics and Politics of Global Climate Change. New York: Routledge. pp. 225–238. Crossref.
10.
DeLoughreyE.M.2019. Allegories of the Anthropocene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
DemosT.J.2017. Against the Anthropocene. Visual Culture and Environment Today. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
DiaconuM.2022. ‘Rescaling the weather experience: From an object of aesthetics to a matter of concern’. Environmental Values31(1): 67–84. Crossref.
14.
Di PaolaM.2017. Ethics and Politics of the Built Environment: Gardens of the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer.
15.
Di PaolaM. and CiccarelliS.. 2022. ‘The disorienting aesthetics of mashed-up Anthropocene environments’. Environmental Values31(1): 85–106. Crossref.
16.
DrenthenM. and KeulartzJ.. 2014. ‘Introduction’. In DrenthenM. and KeulartzJ. (eds), Old World and New World Perspectives in Environmental Philosophy: Transatlantic Conversations. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 1–14.
17.
DuclosJ.S.2020. ‘Uncomplicating the idea of wilderness’. Environmental Values29 (1): 89–107. Crossref.
HartmanL.M. and WooleyK.M.2020. ‘The good, the wild, and the native: An ethical evaluation of ecological restoration, native landscaping, and the “Wild Ones” of Wisconsin’. Environmental Values29 (5): 579–603. Crossref.
21.
LehtinenS.2020. ‘An intergenerational approach to urban futures: Introducing the concept of aesthetic sustainability’. In HaapalaA., FrydryczakB. and SalwaM. (eds), Moving from Landscapes to Cityscapes and Back: Theoretical and Applied Approaches to Human Environments. Lodz: Przypis. pp. 111–119.
22.
LindquistM.A.2020. ‘Aesthetics at the intersection of the species problem and de-extinction technology’. Environmental Values29 (5): 605–624. Crossref.
23.
MikkonenJ.2022. ‘Aesthetic appreciation of nature and the global environmental crisis’. Environmental Values31(1): 47–66. Crossref.
24.
NaukkarinenO.2017. ‘Aesthetics of popular culture as environmental aesthetics’. Popular Inquiry: The Journal of Kitsch, Camp and Mass Culture1 (2017): 3–15.
25.
NomikosA.2018. ‘Place Matters’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism76 (4): 453–462. Crossref.
SaitoY.2018. ‘Consumer aesthetics and environmental ethics: Problems and possibilities’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism76 (4): 429–439. http://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12594.
32.
ThornesJ.E.2008. ‘A rough guide to environmental art’. Annual Review of Environment and Resources33: 391–411. Crossref.
33.
VogelS.2015. Thinking Like a Mall. Environmental Philosophy after the End of Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
WolterstorffN.2003. ‘Why philosophy of art cannot handle kissing, touching, and crying’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism61 (1): 17–27. Crossref.
35.
ZamirT.2007. Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
