While many aspects of human life are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, values related to selfhood and community are among the most challenging to preserve. In what follows, I focus on the importance of values and valuing in climate change adaptation. To do so, I will first discuss two alternate approaches to valuing, both of which fail to recognise the loss of valued objects and practices that both of which help to generate a sense of self and deserve to be respected and mourned. Ultimately, I argue that an approach to valuing that is responsive to change and open to loss will enable humans to be more resilient in the face of anthropogenic climate change, in order that we may move forward and construct selves that fit the context in which we live.
AdgerW.N.2016. ‘Place, well-being, and fairness shape priorities for adaptation to climate change’. Global Environmental Change38: A1–A3. Crossref.
2.
AlbrechtG., SartoreG., ConnorL., HigginbothamN., FreemanS., KellyB., StainH., TonnaA. and PollardG.. 2007. ‘Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change’. Australasian Psychiatry15 (1): 95–98. Crossref.
3.
AyersJ. and ForsythT.. 2009. ‘Community-based adaptation to climate change’. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development51 (4): 22–31. Crossref.
ButlerJ.2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
6.
CaseyE.S.2013. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Cunsolo WilloxA.2012. ‘Climate change as the work of mourning’. Ethics and the Environment17 (2): 137–164. Crossref.
8.
Cunsolo WilloxA., StephensonE., AllenJ., BourqueF., DrossosA., ElgaroyS., KralM.J., . 2015. ‘Examining relationships between climate change and mental health in the circumpolar north’. Regional Environmental Change15 (1): 169–182. Crossref.
9.
Cunsolo WilloxA.HarperS.L., FordJ.D., EdgeA.L., LandmanK., HouleK., BlakeS. and WolfreyC.. 2013. ‘Climate change and mental health: an exploratory case study from Rigolet, Nunatsiavut, Canada’. Climatic Change121 (2): 255–270. Crossref.
10.
DodmanD. and MitlinD.. 2011. ‘Challenges for community-based adaptation: discovering the potential for transformation’. Journal of International Development25 (5): 640–659. Crossref.
11.
EllisN.R. and AlbrechtG.A.. 2017. ‘Climate change threats to family farmer's sense of place and mental wellbeing: a case study from the Western Australian wheatbelt’. Social Science and Medicine175: 161–168. Crossref.
EnglerS.2005. ‘Afterward: tradition's legacy’. In EnglerS. and GrieveG.P., Historicizing ‘Tradition’ in the Study of Religion, pp. 357–378. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Crossref.
14.
FigueroaR.M.2006. ‘Evaluating environmental justice claims’. In BauerJ., Forging Environmentalistm: Justice, Livelihood, and Contested Environments, pp. 360–376. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
15.
FigueroaR.M.2011. ‘Indigenous peoples and cultural losses’. In DryzekJ.S., NorgaardR.B. and SchlosbergD., The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, pp. 232–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
16.
FrankfurtH.G.1998. ‘Freedom of the will and the concept of a person’. In FrankfurtH.G., The Importance of What We Care About, pp. 11–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
17.
FrankfurtH.G.2006. Taking Ourselves Seriously and Getting It Right. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
FrankfurtH.G.2009. ‘The importance of what we care about’. In FrankfurtH.G., The Importance of What We Care About, pp. 80–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
19.
FrankfurtH.G.2004. The Reasons of Love. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Crossref.
20.
GardinerS.2006. ‘A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption’. Environmental Values15 (3): 397–413. Crossref.
21.
GendreauM.S.2017. ‘Mitigating loss for persons displaced by climate change through the framework of the Warsaw mechanism’. Ethics, Policy, and Environment20 (2): 168–183. Crossref.
22.
GrieveG.P. and WeissR.. 2005. ‘Illuminating the half-life of tradition: legitimation, agency, and counter-hegemonies’. In EnglerS. and GrieveG.P., Historicizing ‘Tradition’ in the Study of Religion, pp. 1–15. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Crossref.
23.
HassanF.A.2009. ‘Human agency, climate change, and culture: an archaeological perspective’. In CrateS.A. and NuttallM., Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
24.
HeydT.2011. ‘Ethical and prudential responsibilities, culture, and climate change’. In NandaV., Climate Change and Environmental Ethics, pp. 65–76. New Brunswick: Transaction.
25.
HollandB.2012. ‘Environment as meta-capability: why a dignified human life requires a stable climate system’. In ThompsonA. and Bendik-KeymerJ., Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change, pp. 145–164. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
HollandB.2008. ‘Justice and environment in Nussbaum's “Capabilities Approach”: why sustainable ecological capacity is a meta-capability’. Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 319–332. Crossref.
27.
IPCC. 2015. Climate Change 2014: Sythesis Report Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
28.
JamiesonD.1992. ‘Ethics, public policy, and global warming’. Science, Technology, and Human Values17 (2): 139–153. Crossref.
29.
LustgartenA.2020. ‘The great climate migration has begun’. The New York Times Magazine, July 23.
30.
McShaneK.2017. ‘Values and harms in loss and damage’. Ethics, Policy, and Environment20 (2): 129–142. Crossref.
31.
MillJ.S.2006. On Liberty and the Subjection of Women. London: Penguin Classics.
32.
NomikosA.2018. ‘Place matters’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism76 (4): 453–462. Crossref.
33.
NortonB.G. and HannonB.. 1997. ‘Environmental values: a place-based theory’. Environmental Ethics19 (3): 227–245. Crossref.
34.
NussbaumM.C.2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Crossref.
35.
O'BrienK.L.2009. ‘Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation?’. In AdgerW.N., LorenzoniI. and O'BrienK.L., Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance, pp. 164–180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
36.
ParfitD.2011. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
37.
Piguet, PecoudE. A. and de GuchteneireP.. 2011. Migration and Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
38.
PlourdeC.2015–2018. Last Man on Earth. Directed by Chris Plourde. Produced by Chris Plourde.
39.
RaibleyJ.2013. ‘Values, agency, and welfare’. Philosophical Topics41 (1): 187–212. Crossref.
40.
ScanlonT.M.1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
41.
SchlosbergD.2007. Defining Environmental Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
42.
ShockleyK.2018. ‘The great de-coupling: why minimizing humanity's dependence on the environment may not be cause for celebration’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics31: 429–442. Crossref.
43.
ShueH.2014. ‘The unavoidability of justice’. In ShueH., Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
SylvanR.1973. ‘Is there a need for a new, an environmental, ethic?’. Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy.Varna, Bulgaria: Sofia Press. Crossref.
45.
ThompsonA. and Bendik-KeymerJ.. 2012. Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref.
46.
TiberiusV.2018. Well-Being as Value Fulfillment: How We Can Help Each Other to Live Well. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
47.
TschakertP., TutuR. and AlcaroA.. 2013. ‘Embodied experiences of environmental and climatic changes in landscapes of everyday life in Ghana’. Emotion, Space, and Society7: 13–25. Crossref.
48.
UNFCCC.2013. Non-Economic Losses in the Context of the Work Programme on Loss and Damage. Geneva: United Nations Office at Geneva. Crossref.
WhyteK.P., CaldwellC. and SchaeferM.. 2018. ‘Indigenous lessons about sustainability are not just for “all humanity”’. In SzeJ., Sustainability: Approaches to Environmental Justice and Social Power, pp. 149–179. New York: New York University Press. Crossref.
