Developments in biosemiotics and democratic theory enable renewed appreciation of the possibilities for ecological democracy. Semiotics is the study of sign processes in meaning-making and communication. Signs and meanings exist in all living systems, and all living systems are therefore semiotic systems. Ecological communication can involve abiotic and biotic communication, including human language, facilitating an integration of politics and ecology in the form of ecological democracy encompassing communicative networks in nature and human society.
ÅgrenJ.A., DaviesN.G. and FosterK.R.. 2019. ‘Enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation’. Nature Ecology & Evolution3: 1018–1029. Crossref.
2.
BarbieriM.2003. The Organic Codes. An Introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
3.
BarbieriM.2009. ‘A short history of biosemiotics’. Biosemiotics2 (2): 221–245. Crossref.
4.
ChambersS.2003. ‘Deliberative democratic theory’. Annual Review of Political Science6: 307–336. Crossref.
5.
ChampagneM.2013. ‘A necessary condition for proof of abiotic semiosis’. Semiotica197: 283–287. Crossref.
6.
ChomskyN.1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CookeB.2012. ‘Rabbits: manageable environmental pests or participants in new Australian ecosystems?’ Wildlife Research39 (4): 279–289. Crossref.
8.
CuratoN.2019. ‘Interrupting deliberation’. Paper presented at the General Conference. of the European Consortium for Political Research, Wroclaw.
9.
DeelyJ.1990. Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
DobsonA.1996. ‘Democratizing green theory: preconditions and principles’. In DohertyB. and de GeusM. (eds), Democracy and Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship, pp. 132–148. London: Routledge. Crossref.
11.
DobsonA.2010. ‘Democracy and nature: speaking and listening’. Political Studies58 (4): 752–768. Crossref.
12.
DobsonA.2014. Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
13.
DryzekJ.S.1987. Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. New York: Basil Blackwell.
14.
DryzekJ.S.1995. Political and ecological communication. Environmental Politics4: 13–20. Crossref.
15.
EckersleyR.1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16.
EckersleyR.2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref.
17.
EckersleyR.2020. ‘Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: looking back, looking forward’. Environmental Politics29 (2): 214–234. Crossref.
18.
EcoU.1986Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Crossref.
19.
EnardW., PrzeworskiM., FisherS.E., LaiC.S., WiebeV., KitanoT., MonacoA.P. and PääboS., 2002. ‘Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language’. Nature418: 869–872. Crossref.
20.
Georgescu-RoegenN.1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Crossref.
21.
GoodallJ.1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
GoodinR.E.2003. Reflective Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
GordonR. and SeckbachJ.E.. 2016. Biocommunication. Sign-Mediated Interactions between Cells and Organisms. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing. Crossref.
24.
GouldC.C.2004. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
25.
HabermasJ.1975. ‘Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism’. Theory and Society2: 287–300. Crossref.
26.
HabermasJ.1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref.
27.
HabermasJ.2003. Truth and Justification. Cambridge: Polity.
28.
HarariA. and SharonR.. 2016. ‘Chemical communication’. In GordonR. and SeckbachJ., (eds.) Biocommunication: Sign-Mediated Interactions between Cells and Organisms, pp. 229–256. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing. Crossref.
29.
HarringtonF.H. and MechL.D.. 1979. ‘Wolf howling and its role in territory maintenance’. Behavior68 (3–4): 207–249. Crossref.
30.
HauserM.D., ChomskyN. and Tecumseh FitchW.. 2002. ‘The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’ Science298: 1569–1579. Crossref.
31.
HoffmeyerJ.1996. Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
32.
HoffmeyerJ.2008. Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.
33.
LandemoreH.2012. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
LeopoldA.1949. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
ListC. and PettitP.. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Collective Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
LloydG.1984. The Man of Reason. London: Methuen.
37.
LovejoyA.1936. The Great Chain of Being. New York: Harper.
38.
MargalefR.1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
39.
McGinnisM.1999. Bioregionalism. New York: Routledge.
40.
MeijerE.2019. When Animals Speak: Toward an Interspecies Democracy. New York: New York University Press. Crossref.
41.
MorrisC.1944. ‘Foundations of the theory of signs’. International Encyclopedia of United Science1: 1–59.
42.
NiemeyerS.2004. ‘Deliberation in the wilderness: displacing symbolic politics’. Environmental Politics13 (2): 347–372. Crossref.
43.
NiemeyerS.2020. ‘Deliberation and ecological democracy: from citizen to global system’. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning22 (1): 16–29. Crossref.
44.
PagelM.2017. ‘Darwinian perspectives on the evolution of human languages’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review24 (1): 151–157. Crossref.
45.
ParkinsonJ. and MansbridgeJ. (eds). 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
46.
PatteeH.H.1968. ‘The physical basis of coding and reliability in biological evolution’. In WaddingtonC. H., (ed.) Toward a Theoretical Biology, pp. 67–93. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Crossref.
47.
PeirceC.S.1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol 2. 1893–1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
48.
PikaS., LiebalK. and TomaselloM.. 2005. ‘Gestural communication in subadult bonobos (Pan paniscus): repertoire and use. American Journal of Primatology65: 39–61. Crossref.
49.
PlumwoodV.1984. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York: Routledge. Crossref.
PlumwoodV.2001a. ‘Inequality, ecojustice, and ecological rationality’. In DryzekJ. S. and SchlosbergD., (eds.) Debating the Earth. The Environment Politics Reader, pp. 559–583. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
PlumwoodV.2001b. ‘Nature as agency and the prospects for a progressive naturalism’. Capitalism Nature Socialism12: 3–32. Crossref.
53.
PlumwoodV.2002. Environmental Culture. The Ecological Crisis of Reason. New York; Routledge. Crossref.
54.
PosnerR., RoberingK. and SebeokT.A.. 1997. Semiotik/Semiotics: A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretical Foundations of Nature and Culture, Vol 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Crossref.
55.
RockströmJ., SteffenW., NooneK., PerssonA., ChapinF.C., LambinE.F., LentonT.M., SchefferM., FolkeC., SchellnhuberH.J., NykvistB., de WitC.A., HughesT., van der LeeuwS., RodheH., SorlinS., SnyderP.K., CostanzaR., SvedinU., FalkenmarkM., KarlbergL., CorellR.W., FabryV.J., HansenJ., WalkerB., LivermanD., RichardsonK., CrutzenP. and FoleyJ.A.. 2009. ‘A safe operating space for humanity’. Nature461 (7263): 472–475. Crossref.
56.
RolloT.2017. ‘Everyday deeds: enactive protest, exit, and silence in deliberative systems’. Political Theory45 (5): 597–609. Crossref.
57.
RomeroJ.2020. ‘Democratizing the Anthropocene: environmental politics and deliberation in J. Habermas and J. Dryzek’. In DobbinsE.G., PigaM.L. and MancaL., (eds.) Environment, Social Justice, and the Media in the Age of the Anthropocene, pp. 53–77. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
58.
SafinaC.2016. Beyond Words: What Animals Think and Feel. New York: Picador.
59.
SchlosbergD., BäckstrandK. and PickeringJ.. 2019. ‘Reconciling ecological and democratic values: recent perspectives on ecological democracy’. Environmental Values28 (1): 1–8. Crossref.
60.
SebeokT.1972. Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.
61.
SebeokT.2001. ‘Biosemiotics: its roots, proliferation, and prospects’. Semiotica134: 61–78. Crossref.
62.
SmithG.2003. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London: Routledge. Crossref.
63.
SteffenW., CrutzenP.J. and McNeillJ.R.. 2007. ‘The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?’ Ambio36 (8): 614–621. Crossref.
64.
StegmannU.2018. Animal Communication Theory: Information and Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
VogelS.1997. ‘Habermas and the ethics of nature’, in GottliebR. (ed.). The Ecological Community: Environmental Challenges for Philosophy, Politics, and Morality, pp. 175–192. New York: Routledge.
66.
WohllebenP.2017. The Hidden Life of Trees. Vancouver: William Collins.
67.
YoungI.M.1996. ‘Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy’. In BenhabibS. (ed), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, pp. 120–135. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
